Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Infered Claim

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I recieved a ssoc on a right Knee injury. i have a dro hearing coming up in the future. I was green when my rep filed this claim. Later I asked him if we could change it to bilateral. He said not until we got a decision on the rt. knee because it was well into the process.

does the following make it an infered claim or am I dreaming. The following is my responce but I will wait for some feed back before I take it to the ro next week. I don't want to look like an idiot and can still change it.

Thanks Jim 501st

--------------- SS ------------- Claim # ----------- 20, May 2008

This letter is in response to your decision for service connection for degenerative joint disease, right knee ( claimed as right knee condition.

Your first sentence says “ Records from VAMC -------- show that you continue to seek treatment for bilateral knees.”

I am now assuming this is a claim for (inferred) bilateral knees, rather then rt. Knee only.

Now.

You refer to the statements received on Jan. 4, 2008 and the use of the right knee during military training. I would like to call your attention to title 38, sec. 4.22. ( attached). There is no record in existence except my word of this injury, and I don’t deny it happened, but I do deny the importance the C&P Drs. Assistant put on it. It is not possible to have gone through the training described in my statement on Jan. 4 2008 with a knee in that condition, and since you accept the pre-service statement of the injury, I think you should accept my word when I say I was given light duty the remainder of my enlistment due solely to this knee injury.

Also I have attached an article showing how an acute fracture of the knee cap can be mistaken for bipartite patella. It bares credence to Dr. Bash’s statement, especially page two ( number 6) starting with This case is confusing because.

I am also sending a copy of the material I sent with an appeal on meniere’s disease. It has nothing to do with this case per-say, except to show how my smr’s were changed and add credence to the argument I made in my letter dated Jan. 4 2008 of my knee being swollen more than a year after the injury.

In summery I think reasonable doubt should weigh in my favor.

Thanks ----------------

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Posted

"I was given light duty the remainder of my enlistment due solely to this knee injury."

There should be proof of that found in your service personnel records and it would support your inservice injury.

"except to show how my smr’s were changed and add credence to the argument I made in my letter dated Jan. 4 2008 of my knee being swollen more than a year after the injury."

If you have private treatment records of that within the first year after service- it would help support your claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Posted
"I was given light duty the remainder of my enlistment due solely to this knee injury."

There should be proof of that found in your service personnel records and it would support your inservice injury.

"except to show how my smr's were changed and add credence to the argument I made in my letter dated Jan. 4 2008 of my knee being swollen more than a year after the injury."

If you have private treatment records of that within the first year after service- it would help support your claim.

Berta I don't have a copy of my service personnel records, so I don't know.

Unfortunately my family Dr. who did treat me for this and many other things for 14 years died. I have used every resources I have to find his records but have been told they most likely were destroyed.

I live in a rural town and that was along time ago.

Posted

Jim,

Just wondering what DR. Bash charged you. Did the VA refer to his statement in your SOCC? Were you denied even with his letter?

Posted
Jim,

Just wondering what DR. Bash charged you. Did the VA refer to his statement in your SOCC? Were you denied even with his letter?

Callover007 Dr Bash charged me $2500.00. Was it money well spent? I think so:

Yes the RO made reference to his opinion in their decision. The document in question had an unreadable date on the Dr's notes.

The injury occurred in Sept. 1961. The document he used showed the Knee was still swollen 13 months after the injury, but as I said the scribbling in the date section was unreadable.

Dr. bash picked up on this and went on to explain at the bottom of the document Of the typed in date, And the difference in my rank. I had got A PROMOTION since the original injury.

Of coarse Dr Bash was correct but the Rater insisted he was wrong, and insisted he / she could read the unreadable date at the top and it was a year earlier than the injury, that the knee was still swollen. You have to love those folks at the ro. a little simple math would show I was a civilian on the date she insisted she could read.

Oh well I have a dro hearing coming up sometime in the future, And I think Dr. Bash's IMO will speck for it's self.

I think I will eventually win with his IMO, But stupid is as stupid is. I don't remember what the range of motion was, but do remember it was bad enough to equal the amputation rule rating.

Jim501st

  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted
Berta I don't have a copy of my service personnel records, so I don't know.

Unfortunately my family Dr. who did treat me for this and many other things for 14 years died. I have used every resources I have to find his records but have been told they most likely were destroyed.

I live in a rural town and that was along time ago.

Jim,

This may help you. Through my travels with the VA process, I did find that your local hospital keeps on file where each doctor in the area has their records stored. Upon their death, or even when they retire and give up their practice.

I was able to track mine back 30 years from the information given to me by the hospital.

I also live in a small rural area.

Good Luck,

Betty

Posted
Jim,

This may help you. Through my travels with the VA process, I did find that your local hospital keeps on file where each doctor in the area has their records stored. Upon their death, or even when they retire and give up their practice.

I was able to track mine back 30 years from the information given to me by the hospital.

I also live in a small rural area.

Good Luck,

Betty

Thanks Josephine for the advice. We only have one hospital and my Dr. did send his patients there.

I went their two years ago and asked but the Lady in records advised me that the hospital had been bought and sold so many times they were having problems finding records from five years ago.

I went back this past Jan. and the Lady told me she had only worked there a few months, She checked the computer. (nothing) Then she went through there hard copy files. ( nothing).

She said they had boxes of Micro-fish and as she got time she would try to locate them. She said if I didn't get a call within two weeks, she couldn't find them. I suspect the first lady I talked to was probably right when she said they most likely had been destroyed.

Thanks Jim501st

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • From CCK-Law.com

      VA Disability Payment Schedule for 2025

      VA Disability Rates 2025
      • 2 replies
    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 1 review
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 reviews
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use