Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Wwii Open Claim

Rate this question


Guest Maddie

Question

Hi

I am helping my grandfather with a WWII clam for trench foot, back, and hip pain. When I was reviewing his military records, he had a postcard in there from the VARO in San Fran- someone had typed in his address and his C-file number- most importantly it says on this postcard "acknolwedgment of receipt of claim." Unfortunately there is not postmark on the postcard but the bottom of the postcard says VA Form 23-39, May 1958. Based on the home address they have for him on the postcard he thinks it is from around 1966 when he further injured his back on his civilian job and was out of work for 1 year. The VARO has no record of this claim. Thoughts??

What was the standard for vets being discharged from WWII service for establishing SC claims? In his medical records (he has copies of the hospital statement) he was hospitalized for 31 days for trench foot and it also documents back and hip pain. Did the VA / DOD do exit medical exams? Did they have the duty to review medical records for SC or what was the standard?

Any help would be appreciated. He is in Idaho and according to the VARO there within 60 days he should have C&P and then within 6 months a decision. I wrote the letter for him asking for SC and asserted that he has an open claim going back to 1966.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Good for you- hold them to that with the proof you have-

I would suggest if they ask for more info on that, get a copy of both sides of the Post Card and mail it to them-

Have you been able to look through the veteran's c file yet- you never know what they might have in it-

The trench foot comes under the VA's Cold Weather protocol-along with frostbite etc.

Does he have a residual problem due to the trench foot that they could actually rate?

Does he have medical evidence other then the SMRs that would show VA that the non service back injury was aggravated by the residual affects of the prior inservice back injury?

Or is the inservice back injury documentation clearly separate from the after service back injury?

What I see is that the VA would attempt to find his present back condition as Non service connected unless the medical evidence clearly shows two separate injuries.

This might need a good Independent Medical opinion-

unless medical tretment records show years of treatment for hips and back due to the in service injury which could certainly add additional problems if a vet gets an additional on- the- job injury.

If for example the SMRs reveal specific spinal or disk injury(say at L-3 , L-4) (by X ray) and then the job injury involves separate lumbar involvement (like neck only and not spine) this is medical information that can make a distinction between these two problems.

Berta

Do the in service back and hip problems (I assume he has current documented disability and treatment records on them) affect his feet ?

Or vice versa- if so I would mention this to the C & P doctor-

If he has any other known medical conditions I suggest that you look into 38 CFR 3.309(a) (Presumptives by Chronicity) 2004 as to whether any of them were manifested at 10% or more after service (by medical evidence)

and by all means this is the time to add them to the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hi

I am helping my grandfather with a WWII clam for trench foot, back, and hip pain. When I was reviewing his military records, he had a postcard in there from the VARO in San Fran- someone had typed in his address and his C-file number- most importantly it says on this postcard "acknolwedgment of receipt of claim." Unfortunately there is not postmark on the postcard but the bottom of the postcard says VA Form 23-39, May 1958. Based on the home address they have for him on the postcard he thinks it is from around 1966 when he further injured his back on his civilian job and was out of work for 1 year. The VARO has no record of this claim. Thoughts??

What was the standard for vets being discharged from WWII service for establishing SC claims? In his medical records (he has copies of the hospital statement) he was hospitalized for 31 days for trench foot and it also documents back and hip pain. Did the VA / DOD do exit medical exams? Did they have the duty to review medical records for SC or what was the standard?

Any help would be appreciated. He is in Idaho and according to the VARO there within 60 days he should have C&P and then within 6 months a decision. I wrote the letter for him asking for SC and asserted that he has an open claim going back to 1966.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I suggest you have your grandfather make a written request for a copy of his c file from the V.A. so he can see if the earliest claim is in his c folder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for you- hold them to that with the proof you have-

I would suggest if they ask for more info on that, get a copy of both sides of the Post Card and mail it to them-

YES I DID THAT.

Have you been able to look through the veteran's c file yet- you never know what they might have in it- SENDING THEM A LETTER FOR THEM TO REQUEST C_FILE

The trench foot comes under the VA's Cold Weather protocol-along with frostbite etc.

Does he have a residual problem due to the trench foot that they could actually rate? OH DEFINITELY- DISFORMED TOE NAILS, SEVERELY CRACKED HEELS, ETC. PRETTY SIMILAR TO MY HUSBAND WHO HAS FROSTBITE RESIDUALS BUT HIS IS WORSE BECAUSE OF THE TOE NAILS S IT MIGHT BE 20% SC RATING.

Does he have medical evidence other then the SMRs that would show VA that the non service back injury was aggravated by the residual affects of the prior inservice back injury? NOT SURE WE ARE WRITING TO ASK.

Or is the inservice back injury documentation clearly separate from the after service back injury? DITTO.

What I see is that the VA would attempt to find his present back condition as Non service connected unless the medical evidence clearly shows two separate injuries.

This might need a good Independent Medical opinion-

unless medical tretment records show years of treatment for hips and back due to the in service injury which could certainly add additional problems if a vet gets an additional on- the- job injury. WE HAVE TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE HE HAS- PROBLEM IS THOSE DOCTORS- CHIROPORACTORS WHO TREATED HIM ARE PROBABLY ALL DEAD AND MEDICAL RECORDS MAY NOT EXIST ANYMORE FROM THEIR OFFICES.

If for example the SMRs reveal specific spinal or disk injury(say at L-3 , L-4) (by X ray) and then the job injury involves separate lumbar involvement (like neck only and not spine) this is medical information that can make a distinction between these two problems.

Berta

Do the in service back and hip problems (I assume he has current documented disability and treatment records  on them) affect his feet ?

Or vice versa- if so I would mention this to the C & P doctor-

If he has any other known medical conditions I suggest that you look into 38 CFR 3.309(a) (Presumptives by Chronicity) 2004 as to whether any of them were manifested at 10% or more after service (by medical evidence)

and by all means this is the time to add them to the claim.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

HE DIDN'T MENTION ANYTHING ELSE BUT I AM GOING TO MAKE SURE HE DOESN'T HAVE COLD INJURIES ON HIS HANDS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Hi

I am helping my grandfather with a WWII clam for trench foot, back, and hip pain. When I was reviewing his military records, he had a postcard in there from the VARO in San Fran- someone had typed in his address and his C-file number- most importantly it says on this postcard "acknolwedgment of receipt of claim." Unfortunately there is not postmark on the postcard but the bottom of the postcard says VA Form 23-39, May 1958. Based on the home address they have for him on the postcard he thinks it is from around 1966 when he further injured his back on his civilian job and was out of work for 1 year. The VARO has no record of this claim. Thoughts??

What was the standard for vets being discharged from WWII service for establishing SC claims? In his medical records (he has copies of the hospital statement) he was hospitalized for 31 days for trench foot and it also documents back and hip pain. Did the VA / DOD do exit medical exams? Did they have the duty to review medical records for SC or what was the standard?

Any help would be appreciated. He is in Idaho and according to the VARO there within 60 days he should have C&P and then within 6 months a decision. I wrote the letter for him asking for SC and asserted that he has an open claim going back to 1966.

Maddie, It does sound like a pending claim. One thought is to be understand the concept of pending claim visit the website of the U.S. Court of Appeals for veterans Claims and do an online search of cases under pending claim. Have you grandfather write v.a. and ask for a copy of his v.a. claims folder. Also have your grandfather appoint Disabled American veterans or a similar service organization as his representative in order to review his file. Do not turn over that original postcard to anyone because it may be evidence of a pending unadjudicate claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Delta- we definitely will hold on to the postcard. I have mixed feelings of DAV etc and other orgs because my experiences with them is they are not very responsive (in some cases worse that the VA itself!). I did have him write a letter for the c-file copy a few weeks back. We are out about 60 days from the initial letter requesting C&P, etc. I'll definitely research pending claim in BVA archives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use