Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Specially Adapted Housing

Rate this question


dannydad

Question

this section seems to indicate that loss of use, indicates that the veteran can not ambulate or walk even a few steps. The section later goes on to interpret the term "preclude locomotion". however local rating officals seem to prefer section 4.63 as the correct interpretation------whats your opinion ???????? I am not sure how to handle this,help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I hope this helps you

[EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: 66 FR 44527, 44528, Aug. 24, 2001, amended paragraph (d), effective Aug. 24, 2001.]

§ 3.809 Specially adapted housing under 38 U.S.C. 2101(a).

Discussion and Analysis in the Veterans Benefits Manual

Text

A certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing under 38 U.S.C. 2101(a) may be extended to a veteran if the following requirements are met:

(a) Service. Active military, naval or air service after April 20, 1898, is required. Benefits are not restricted to veterans with wartime service.

(B) Disability. The disability must have been incurred or aggravated as the result of service as indicated in paragraph (a) of this section and the veteran must be entitled to compensation for permanent and total disability due to:

(1) The loss, or loss of use, of both lower extremities, such as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair, or

(2) Blindness in both eyes, having only light perception, plus the anatomical loss or loss of use of one lower extremity, or

(3) The loss or loss of use of one lower extremity together with residuals of organic disease or injury which so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair.

(4) The loss or loss of use of one lower extremity together with the loss of loss of use of one upper extremity which so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair.

© Duplication of benefits. The assistance referred to in this section will not be available to any veteran more than once.

(d) "Preclude locomotion." This term means the necessity for regular and constant use of a wheelchair, braces, crutches or canes as a normal mode of locomotion although occasional locomotion by other methods may be possible.

Source

[26 FR 1606, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 34 FR 9560, June 18, 1969; 43 FR 14018, Apr. 4, 1978; 46 FR 47543, Sept. 29, 1981]

Notes

(38 U.S.C. 2101, 2104)

CROSS REFERENCE: Assistance to certain disabled veterans in acquiring specially adapted housing. See §§ 36.4400 through 36.4410 of this chapter.

§ 3.809a Special home adaptation grants under 38 U.S.C. 2101(B).

Text

A certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring necessary special home adaptations, or, on or after October 28, 1986, for assistance in acquiring a residence already adapted with necessary special features, under 38 U.S.C. 2101(B) may be issued to a veteran who served after April 20, 1898, if the following requirements are met:

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2101(B))

(a) The veteran is not entitled to a certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing under § 3.809 nor had the veteran previously received assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing under 38 U.S.C. 2101(a). A veteran who first establishes entitlement under this section and who later becomes eligible for a certificate of eligibility under § 3.809 may be issued a certificate of eligibility under § 3.809. However, no particular type of adaptation, improvement, or structural alteration may be provided to a veteran more than once.

(B) The veteran is entitled to compensation for permanent and total disability which (1) is due to blindness in both eyes with 5/200 visual acuity or less, or (2) includes the anatomical loss or loss of use of both hands.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2101(B))

© The assistance referred to in this section will not be available to any veteran more than once.

Source

[46 FR 47543, Sept. 29, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 23237, June 21, 1988]

Notes

(

Edited by Pete53
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this section seems to indicate that loss of use, indicates that the veteran can not ambulate or walk even a few steps. The section later goes on to interpret the term "preclude locomotion". however local rating officals seem to prefer section 4.63 as the correct interpretation------whats your opinion ???????? I am not sure how to handle this,help

Not sure what you are asking but looks like you are only reading part of the CFR. Your "ambulate or walk even a few steps equals do you require crutches or braces to walk or are in the need of a wheel chair. to preclude locomotion equals to preclude locomotion (walk) without the use of crutches, cane, brace or wheel. So it really means the same thing.

Bottom line is they truly look at the remaining function of the limb and the need for assistance to walk witn cane, crutch, brace or wheel chair is the same as amputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

clown man I have read all the CFR's that apply and the m21-1mr,partIX,subparti,chapter 2. still I am concerned. I have a case from last year,citation nr;0826587 dated 08/07/08, the vet walked with a cane,and used a powered wheelchair the board said she is entitled to a specality housing grant. Thats good but I'm not convinced.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use