HadIt.com Elder tagandbag Posted July 24, 2009 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted July 24, 2009 Here is some of the reason for my appeal to the BVA and link to Rice vs Shinseki. The RO failed to properly consider the Social Security Disability Determination that found the veteran to be totally and permanently disabled due to my service connected PTSD. The VA Diagnostic Code for Mental Disorders awards a rating of 100% for total occupational and social impairment. The social security disability determination is prima facia evidence of total occupational and social impairment. Furthermore, the Regional Office failed to consider the inferred TDIU claim. The evidence of record points to the fact that the veteran is not working due to his PTSD. The RO has failed to consider TDIU as the Court has demanded it do, most recently in Rice v. Shinseki, as part of the veteran's claim for an increased rating Link: http://www.nvo.org/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2275 Still hoping it wont go to the BVA, I should here something in the next few weeks I believe. Keeping my fingers crossed. t&b " In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress" - John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder MikeR Posted July 25, 2009 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted July 25, 2009 Did the DRO look at it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder tagandbag Posted July 25, 2009 Author HadIt.com Elder Share Posted July 25, 2009 I don't know, sent this in on the 23rd. I'm fairly confident, that I may here something in the next week or so. We'll see. t&b " In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress" - John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsdwd Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 Here is some of the reason for my appeal to the BVA and link to Rice vs Shinseki. The RO failed to properly consider the Social Security Disability Determination that found the veteran to be totally and permanently disabled due to my service connected PTSD. The VA Diagnostic Code for Mental Disorders awards a rating of 100% for total occupational and social impairment. The social security disability determination is prima facia evidence of total occupational and social impairment. Furthermore, the Regional Office failed to consider the inferred TDIU claim. The evidence of record points to the fact that the veteran is not working due to his PTSD. The RO has failed to consider TDIU as the Court has demanded it do, most recently in Rice v. Shinseki, as part of the veteran's claim for an increased rating Link: http://www.nvo.org/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2275 Interesting. I am on Social Security disability for Cirrhosis which resulted from alcoholism. My ptsd rating was for 30% due to ptsd with secondary anxiety, depression and alcohol dependence. So the rating is saying that the alcoholism was secondary to the ptsd. If so, isn't the SSD which arose from the alcoholism germane to my claim? How best to follow this course? Still hoping it wont go to the BVA, I should here something in the next few weeks I believe. Keeping my fingers crossed. t&b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder tagandbag Posted July 26, 2009 Author HadIt.com Elder Share Posted July 26, 2009 jsdwd, I see what your saying, but I think your treading on thin ice with VA on that. I think the VA may look at alcohol dependence as willful misconduct and not the cause of your PTSD. Even though it may be secondary, I think the VA looks at it as self medicating. This is my opinion and it may not be correct. But I would file for increase and iu irregardless, using the SSD award and any other evidence you have or can find. It is very possible with a well grounded appeal it could tip this in your favor. Maybe someone else can chime in, there may be another precedent, that shows an award for this. t&b " In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress" - John Adams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HadIt.com Elder Pete53 Posted July 26, 2009 HadIt.com Elder Share Posted July 26, 2009 In the 90's the VA pretty much ruled against any one who was an alcoholic who did not get treatment or was still drinking. The VA spent a ton of money treating alcoholic Vets and wised up a little. When I spent my 30 days at the BA no tell motel every guy on my locked up ward was either an alcoholic or a drug addict. They tested every Sunday and kicked Vets out of treatment if they tested positive. That was funny cause they let half of these guys go home on the weekend. I think today that the VA will connect alcoholism as secondary to anxuety or depression disorders. Veterans deserve real choice for their health care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsdwd Posted July 26, 2009 Share Posted July 26, 2009 In the 90's the VA pretty much ruled against any one who was an alcoholic who did not get treatment or was still drinking. The VA spent a ton of money treating alcoholic Vets and wised up a little. When I spent my 30 days at the BA no tell motel every guy on my locked up ward was either an alcoholic or a drug addict. They tested every Sunday and kicked Vets out of treatment if they tested positive. That was funny cause they let half of these guys go home on the weekend. I think today that the VA will connect alcoholism as secondary to anxuety or depression disorders. I did seek treatment and no longer drink (15 year sober). So I pass on that count, but as t & b points out it is tricky. Fortunately I have a psychiatric report from several years ago (before I ever filed a claim) that links the two saying the 'alcoholism is probably do to the ptsd', so that helps (even with the fudge word). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
tagandbag
Here is some of the reason for my appeal to the BVA and link to Rice vs Shinseki.
The RO failed to properly consider the Social Security Disability Determination that
found the veteran to be totally and permanently disabled due to my service connected
PTSD. The VA Diagnostic Code for Mental Disorders awards a rating of 100% for total
occupational and social impairment. The social security disability determination is
prima facia evidence of total occupational and social impairment. Furthermore, the
Regional Office failed to consider the inferred TDIU claim. The evidence of record
points to the fact that the veteran is not working due to his PTSD. The RO has failed
to consider TDIU as the Court has demanded it do, most recently in Rice v. Shinseki, as
part of the veteran's claim for an increased rating
Link: http://www.nvo.org/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2275
Still hoping it wont go to the BVA, I should here something in the next few weeks I believe. Keeping my fingers crossed.
t&b
" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"
- John Adams
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
3
2
1
Popular Days
Jul 26
7
Jul 25
2
Jul 24
1
Jul 27
1
Top Posters For This Question
tagandbag 3 posts
jsdwd 3 posts
WHOLESALE 2 posts
MikeR 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 26 2009
7 posts
Jul 25 2009
2 posts
Jul 24 2009
1 post
Jul 27 2009
1 post
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now