Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cfr And Laying Out Evidence

Rate this question


Scott D

Question

When the CFR lists the rating critria, such as the copied version below, can the RO deny this rating level because only one or two of the OR statements is met?

In my case specifically I am on a daily dose of three puffs of an inhaled corticosteroids and have been on four Predisone bursts this last year. While these prescriptions are listed in my medical record, I have a feeling the RO will miss this and force me to NOD the unfavorable rating decision, should I write a statement laying out the timeline of the Prednisone bursts?

FEV-1 of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; FEV-1/FVC of 40 to 55 percent, or; at least monthly visits to a physician for required care of exacerbations, or; intermittent (at least three per year) courses of systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroids.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

When the CFR lists the rating critria, such as the copied version below, can the RO deny this rating level because only one or two of the OR statements is met?

In my case specifically I am on a daily dose of three puffs of an inhaled corticosteroids and have been on four Predisone bursts this last year. While these prescriptions are listed in my medical record, I have a feeling the RO will miss this and force me to NOD the unfavorable rating decision, should I write a statement laying out the timeline of the Prednisone bursts?

FEV-1 of 40- to 55-percent predicted, or; FEV-1/FVC of 40 to 55 percent, or; at least monthly visits to a physician for required care of exacerbations, or; intermittent (at least three per year) courses of systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroids.

Thanks!

Yes, and attach the actual medical records to prove this. Also, write a statement saying how these treatments affect your daily life and the exact reasons why you needed the treatments (IE - symptoms that cause you to need the treatments and be specific). Written information can help a lot, especially when backed by medical documentation. One more point - keep things short and sweet and highlight the areas of the medical records that YOU want them to focus on (yes, they do skim and skim often)....in other words, pretend you're talking to an 8 year old.

As for meeting rating's criteria - They, the VA, have great latitude in interpreting the degree of severity...basically, if you don't meet ALL of the requirements for a given criteria then they can give you the lower rating. Anything short of that and they can claim that "you're disability BEST fits the lower criteria rating", and you'll have an uphill battle. With that said, they are "supposed" to give you the higher rating if you meet "most" of the criteria (IE - if there's 5 criteria and you meet 3 you should get it), but severity is a very debatable thing and they would rather force you to fight upwards then award you what you deserve in the hopes that you'll give up or the BVA will uphold their decision (which they often do). This is also a good reason to frame your argument in terms of the criteria you are shooting for (or even a step higher so you can still get the rating you want, yet the VA feels they still low-balled you).

You should frame your paper to them something like this:

Here are the reasons why I feel I deserve compensation at a higher level -

1) (list a symptom that would meet a given criteria)

2) (list another symptom that meets a different criteria)

3) (rinse/repeat as needed to meet all criteria)

Sum it up by stating that you deserve a higher rating because your disability causes A,B,C,D, etc (basically tie your symptoms directly to the rating's criteria)..... Then attach the relevant medical records and highlight (with a highlighter) all of the information that proves everything you just wrote.

This forces them to counter each point rather then giving them room to make a broad, general decision without giving sufficient reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Namvet6567

Very well put, Jay. I know it's been pointed out before but diaries/journals are excellent evidence and can be very supportive evidence. Symptoms, such as, but not limited to, pain, flare-ups of conditions, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, flashbacks, etc., should be documented as to time, date and it's effect on claimant. A daily diary can be a huge benefit to a claim, however most claimants rarely spend the time, needed, actually keeping one, thereby limiting their probative evidence.

Edited by Namvet6567
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use