Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Berta Help - Got My Rating

Rate this question


Mark

Question

Hi Berta,

I got my rating today from the VA. RThey rated my loss of vision from migraines as 30%. They granted it and rated based upon the Dr's reports and the evaluations - all conducted by the VA, but tthe Dr said it was permanent in nature but they did not grant me P&T. I was 100% before. They said no change in my status. I was already 100% scheduler so I am just adding another 30% rating. The letter states that the arting is based upon "impairment of field of vision is based upon objective testing" Goldman visual feild testing revealed your response, fixation and reliability good. Field finding of your left eye were not within normal limits as you were unable to see the fixation target without a red light at the time necessary for fixation and your vision was mapped at a concentric of 3 degrees centrally.

They go on to say that they have assigned a 30% disability based upon based upon unilateral visual field concentric contractions to 5degrees or less. Higher evals are assigned for more severe levels of impairment.

OK. hereis my question. 1) If the Dr says it is permananet in nature and it has been going on for 4 or 5 years why not grant me P&T? 2) if I have 3 percent vision or on my best day 5 why throw in the line about higher evals are reserved for worse vision loss?

What should I do file a NOD or a CUE?

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Not really worth NODing in my opinion. P&T is a fairly subjective thing on the raters part. Though you may want to ask for P&T on your 100% claim, NODing the 30% claim won't get you much. These are different things entirely and just because one is permanent don’t mean the other will be. In other words, even if you got P&T on the vision thing it wouldn't cover your 100% and you don't really gain anything from the 30% in the first place. Also, you cannot NOD P&T for your total disability picture because you have no "new and material" evidence to reopen the 100% claim (unless I'm reading this wrong and you were just granted both the 100% AND the 30% in the same decision).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There is no such thing as P&T WHEN YOU ARE ALREADY 100% SCHEDULAR.

P&T is when you are less than 100%, and gives you benefits as if you were 100%. in effect, you are already P&T with your 100% schedular. :)

Fight the VA as if they are the enemy; for they are!

Erin go Bragh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am 100% scheduler. The Dr told me that this would most likley push me over to 100 P&T. Then I would rate Chapter 35 benefits for my 3 kids ( 2 in 1st year of college and 1 going this summer, plus the rib would like to go eventually) Also, I have over 20 years of Migraine history, and it is not getting any better. The vision issue is forever as well. I am BLIND in one eye. What the heck does it take to get a P&T rating?

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as P&T WHEN YOU ARE ALREADY 100% SCHEDULAR.

P&T is when you are less than 100%, and gives you benefits as if you were 100%. in effect, you are already P&T with your 100% schedular. :)

That is incorrect. P&T means no future examinations and qualifies you for Ch 35 benefits. You can be 100% and not be P&T, in fact, most are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

Is it worth requesting P&T based upon the VA C&P exam stating stating that my condition is permananet in nature and it has been going on for 4 or 5 years and if so should 'nt that be enough to grant me me P&T? The rating is based upon my migraines that have a documented 20 year history.

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay,

Is it worth requesting P&T based upon the VA C&P exam stating stating that my condition is permananet in nature and it has been going on for 4 or 5 years and if so should 'nt that be enough to grant me me P&T? The rating is based upon my migraines that have a documented 20 year history.

Mark

Well, part of what wally said was correct...there is no real such thing as P&T. Permanence can be given to any diagnosis that has been deemed chronic and static at any time. Total refers to one being "totally" disabled (IE - 100%). So, technically you already have the "T" in P&T, but you lack the "P". The problem with your claim is that you are assuming that if you get P&T (well "P" really) for your 30% claim that you will be permanent over-all....this is not true. The RO "could" grant you P&T over-all, but they would likely just make the 30% diagnosis permanent while keeping your 100% diagnosis as non-permanent. In other words, they are two different conditions that will be evaluated differently and just because one is permanent doesn't mean the other has to be. So, what really do you gain by getting permanence from the 30% rating? The part I am not sure of is whether or not permanence for a 30% rating would qualify you for Ch 35....my guess is that you require both permanence and total disability in order to qualify for Ch 35.

Again, the term P&T is used by vets as a means to understand a given designation, but the VA, to my knowledge, doesn't use it officially. When you are deemed P&T your award merely says "your condition is permanent in nature and no longer requires a future examination" (or something to that effect); it does not say you are officially “permanent and total”.

With that said, you can NOD and hope for the best. Perhaps the DRO will take a look at your "over-all" claim and grant P&T for the whole thing (and not just the 30% condition). Might be worth a try if you’re confident that they will not attempt to reduce your 100% (RO's are good at fishing trips to lower high ratings).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use