Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

18 Vamcs Under The Ax!

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Eighteen More Veterans Administration Medical Centers Are Under The Ax

By David Robert Crews, Magic City Morning Star, Millinocket, ME 04462

Mar 27, 2006,

Ft. Howard Maryland Veterans Administration Medical Center is the first VA

property that will be turned into a veteran and non-veteran independent,

assisted living and geriatric care housing project. Eighteen more VAMCs are

targeted for the same drastic changes. If you are an American military

veteran, or someone who cares about veterans issues, and one of these VAMCs,

on the list that follows later in this article, is not near your home, is

not your or your loved one's source of medical care, it is still important

for you to be aware of what is happening.

Your VAMC could be next. In my previous article about Ft. Howard VAMC, that

is published here in Magic City News under D.R.Crews, I laid out the facts,

as I and some other American citizens see them, about Ft. Howard and other

Veterans Administration Medical Center properties that the VA has decided to

turn into housing developments for veterans and non-vets.

Property that would be better used for much needed new VA medical

facilities. But the federal government will not give the VA enough funding

so that they can replace their old obsolete hospitals.In recent years, the

VAMC system has been transitioning from inpatient care based services to

outpatient care, as most hospitals have. I understand that this is a well

thought out, planned and implemented change.

How much the lack of sufficient, congressional VAMC funding affected the

train of thoughts of the decision makers, who set those changes into motion,

is your guess as good as mine.My big beef about this transition is, our VA

outpatient care could be provided to us veterans just as well in revamped

VAMCs on spacious, peaceful, beautiful grounds as it can be in a crowded,

dirty, definitely more dangerous downtown environment like where the

Baltimore VA Hospital is.

Also, we veterans should still have plenty of access to quality inpatient

care, when we absolutely need it.The Vietnam Veterans of America, the

Veterans of Foreign Wars, the American Legion and other Veterans Service

Organizations are constantly working and fighting for more VA funding. Many

times, I have read reports of their frustrated attempts to procure

Congressional approval for dispersion of more tax dollars to the VA. Money

that some tax payers agree should go to the VA instead of to the pork barrel

type projects that bring in more votes for the incumbent politicians.

Sometime back in the 1990s, the VA decided to start a process of determining

which prime VA real estate locations could be leased out to housing

developers, supposedly, so that the VA could attain more funding for VA

medical use while making the transition from inpatient to outpatient care

based services. The first VA property to be leased out is Ft. Howard

Maryland VAMC.

That lease is probably already signed.It would have been signed a month ago,

but the property developers, who are going to take over Ft. Howard, sent in

a plan for over a thousand living units and Senator Barbara Mikulski sent it

back to them and told them to stick to the three hundred unit limit that had

been agreed upon earlier. At least that's what I heard from another

concerned veteran who responded to my first VAMC article.

Other local vets and several long time Ft. Howard area residents, whom I

talked to recently, expressed their feelings to me that they are in

agreement with my take on things. They also said that they had been hearing

rumors for decades that land developers were after Ft. Howard to lease it

from the government in order to build expensive homes that have wonderful

views of both the Chesapeake Bay and the entrance to the Port of Baltimore.

This raises at least two questions:What came first, the developer's efforts

to influence politicians, VA and other U.S. Government officials to lease

them beautiful Ft. Howard, or did the VA make a sound medical business

decision to lease out property because of their lack of fair funding to

upgrade those properties to modern medical standards?Did the VA then ponder

the facts and realize that prime properties with beautiful views would have

to be sacrificed for better VA health care?

Even though those beautiful views are from nicely landscaped, well

maintained hospital grounds that VA patients, their visitors and the VA

staff working there make good use of to help relieve the stress of dealing

with often life threatening medical conditions.Some other responders to my

article informed me of the VA's progress in their efforts to lease out more

real estate to property developers.If you web search the word CARES, you

will find the VA's web site that tells the government's side of this story.

It has info on all eighteen VAMCs that are being 'studied' for possible

"realignment". I say 'studied', but I think it is a done deal for taking

great VA real estate for high priced housing that may mostly profit

seemingly conniving, maybe even government official bribing, super wealthy

land developers who may end up grandiosely throwing only teeny, tiny

percentages of their profits towards the VAMC health care system like kings

and queens pitching pennies to beggars.

I am not alone in thinking these thoughts.Then will Congress say to the VA

and veterans health care advocates, "You get less tax dollars from us for

the VA budget this year, because you have all of that lease money from them

housing projects of yours to work with!"What if this prediction of a

significantly higher percentage of housing project profits going to the

developers does come true?

And Congress cuts VA funding too far below what their previous funding was,

and then the tax dollars and those lease dollars combined equal a much worse

VA budget short fall than usual?Will Congress then say to the VA, "It's not

our fought that you have less money in your budget this year, that leasing

deal foul-up is your mistake, so live with it!"Here is a list of the

eighteen Veterans Administration Medical Centers that are under the ax:

Big Spring, TX

Boston, MA

Brooklyn-Manhattan, NY

Canandaiga, NY

Gulfport, MS

Lexington. KY

Livermore, CA

Louisville, KY

Montgomery, AL

Montrose/Castle Point, NY

Muskogee, OK

Perry Point, MD

Poplar Bluff, MO

St. Albans, NY

Waco, TX

Walla Walla, WA

West Los Angeles, CA

White City, OR

Stick with me now, this article details in depth what will be a long, hard

fight for us veterans and our supporters, and why. I have to address as many

points of debate about this issue, that I and others who have communicated

with me about it, can think of. We need to be as fully prepared as we can be

to fight the government and the land developers, who are highly skilled at

imposing their public meeting spoken and official report written rhetoric

upon us.

The CARES web site has information on and links to documented public

meetings, proposals, community input, plans, etc. for each VAMC. Of coarse,

it is the government's version of some things that are relevant to the

issues surrounding these upcoming changes.I didn't look too far into any one

document that is on the web site, but I never saw anything about if anyone

was hootin' and hollerin' at any of the public meetings in outright

opposition to having high priced condominiums where the vets should have new

modern medical facilities built for them.

Built in accordance with the promise of lifetime access to good VA medical

care. A written promise that we vets all received, when we signed on the

dotted line then raised our right hands and swore to defend our country,

democracy and families with our lives and the lives of our enemies, whom we

were soon to be ready, willing and able to kill.One day, when I was in the

Ft. Howard VAMC, a group of us patients were discussing inadequacies in the

VA health care system.

A sympathetic VA employee was listening to us and came over to our table

and, with a heart full of soul, said that it really wasn't us military

service survivors who paid for our veterans benefits, it was our comrades in

arms who died while on duty in the service who paid for them. The employee

said that our fellow service personnel loved us as much as we loved them,

and they all knew that we were all taking the same chances. They had willed

us vets our rights to reasonably good VA health care, that are often denied

us. We VA patients all heartily agreed with that VA employee.

A lady from the Livermore, California area sent me this email:It seems that

VA has a lot of prime property, the VA hospital here in Livermore is outside

of town nettled in the hills where the Veterans can see Deer Wild Turkeys

and other critters it's absolutely beautiful, peaceful and quiet. It too is

on the chopping block to be sold and is going to not only take away property

that the veterans love but will be a big inconvenience to families.

I would like to hear from other people who live near and make good use of

these eighteen VAMCs on the list above. I want to know what the fluctuations

in property values in those areas has been like lately. Are the VAMCs in

nice areas? Is there other developing going on around them? Are they

obsolete as medical facilities? Could they be rebuilt with fair funding? Are

they fully used or underused?

Some VAMCs may not be worth keeping as they are. No doubt about it.But who

will make the decisions on what to keep and what to change? Will it be

possibly bribed or other wise similarly influenced government officials?

Will bullied and befuddled ordinary citizens, who are not schooled in public

debate or legal battles, fare well against wealthy, heartless acting land

developers and their government lackeys and/or other co-conspirators who

have extensive public debating and legal experience?

If you web search "Bayside at Ft. Howard" you will find the new web site

that touts the proposed amenities of their upcoming VAMC housing

development.On the Bayside web site's location page, there are two maps and

one aerial photograph of the Ft. Howard area. These will help you to

understand the upcoming traffic and infrastructure problems that are

particular to this project, which are defined nearly in full in my Ft.

Howard VAMC article.

If you live near one of the eighteen VAMCs on the list printed above, it

will help you to determine the extent, depth and breadth of possible

problems that you will have to endure when the developing begins in your

neighborhood. It may influence you to heed this warning that old,

established Ft. Howard area neighborhoods residents' rights are going to be

run over rough shod by the land developers and that you may be next for the

same lousy treatment.I don't know how much all of this baring of the facts

will do. It at least leaves a true historical record of the opposition to

these afore mentioned changes that many, many people think the same about as

I do.

About all that I can do, at this point in my life, about these VAMC changes,

is to inform as much of the public as I can of what is happening, and why I

and some other folks, who aren't writers, say that it is happening--as

opposed to what the land developer's and the VA's spin on the story is.

Because, I live on a monthly non-service connected VA disability check that

about equals take home pay for a minimum wage job. The web sites that

publish my writings are staffed by volunteers.

The sites only stay afloat through meager advertising revenues and the

efforts of their editors and contributors like me who desire to work as hard

as they are able to, express themselves and have some fun writing short

stories along with serious articles like this one. I am an ex-army and

sometimes civilian photographer, though I never did a whole lot of

photography after my discharge from the army, but that's another story, and

my photo portfolio is mostly in hibernation.

This computer that I write my stuff on is an old, worn down thing, and it

barely runs well enough to stay on the Internet long enough at a stretch to

research and email info about these written articles of mine.I do the best

that I can with what I have to work with, so I hope that you will 'take this

ball and run with it'.I am sending as many emails as I can about these VAMC

articles to politicians, media outlets, Veterans Service Organizations,

community groups, barber shops, etc. that are near the VAMCs on the list.

My writings and email efforts may not change much. I'm up against what is

basically a done deal.But, if I can help ensure fair veterans medical care

compensation for the loss of our beloved, beautiful VA properties, then I

have done something besides sit here watching TV all day while stewing in my

U.S. Government issued disappointment and anger; all the time wondering why

I didn't live-fast-die-young-and-leave a good lookin' corpse--like some of

us were advised to do way back when.

I feel like the guy who defended himself from an armed robber by beating a

reasonable amount of crap outa the criminal and then had to pay the robber's

medical expenses and give the robber money for insult and injury that the

violent nature of the crime warranted, because the crime victim had no

witnesses to back him up.You may be able to help me make more of a

difference though.

Make up and circulate petitions. Write to congress. Write local elected

officials; they will say that it is a federal problem at first, but explain

to them what any VA land developing will mean to your local infrastructure,

school populations, traffic patterns, tax rates, etc., etc.. Attack it from

that direction.Collect stories from local vets and their families about how

the VAMC helped them and whether or not it is in the right place for their

reasonable convenience.

Share that information with your local media.Have town hall meetings that

are set up so that you can get your views heard with significant enough

power that stands up to the VA's and land developer's massive powers.If the

VA property in your area should be developed into housing, try and make sure

that the profits from them are spent on veterans medical care.

Make the developers compensate for the inconveniences to your community that

they will swear is only necessary for the veterans own good.Think of things

to do about it that I could never conceive of doing. And pray.There is very

little chance that any one person, or even a massive portion of the American

population, can do something to stop the government from doing what it wants

to.The United States Government has a long, well documented history of

forgetting exactly who keeps this country free.In 1932, World War

One Veterans tried to get the government to give them promised war bonus

money before they died and while they and their families were starving in

the Great Depression. They camped out in Washington, D.C., along with some

of their destitute family members, and protested for months. They were

called the Bonus Army.Eventually, U.S Army officers Douglas MacArthur and

George S. Patton went into the Bonus Army's encampment with fresh regular

army troops and whupped the tar out of the same men whom they had led into

muddy, bloody hell on earth in Europe during 1917-18, and then burned the

camp.

Some of those poor fellows' impoverished family members were injured in the

tear gas laced, brutal attack.Web search "Bonus Army" and see for

yourself.It was because of the Bonus Army's actions that the GI Bill for

higher education benefits, and housing and business loans was written into

law in 1944. The government was afraid that returning World War Two American

Warriors would be disenchanted with the same crappy lives that they had led

before the war and take over the government.

But don't start an armed revolution, that just tends to make a bad situation

worse.To quote my good friend Tom G., who did two combat tours in Vietnam

and then spent even more time than that later, during the past twenty years,

in a half a dozen VA hospitals, "The government doesn't give anything to

veterans out of the goodness of its heart."In the movie Born On The Fourth

Of July, there are scenes that accurately depict the rat infested, miserable

condition that some VAMCs were in back during the Vietnam War.

But, that aspect of VA health care system inadequacies has changed.Today, VA

hospitals have very high ratings in the medical world. The VAMC system is

jammed packed with patients, not all vets who want in can get in. A short

while back, the Baltimore VAMC put a one year moratorium on accepting new

patients, when thousands of Bethlehem Steel retirees had their pensions

pilfered and their earned lifetime civilian medical coverage confiscated.

Though today's VAMCs are crowded, vets often receive top notch treatment

there.We need more modern VA medical facilities. For the first time in our

history, we have the quality of health care that veterans earned. We do not

have the quantity that we need and earned.Building new medical centers on

VAMC properties using a fair dispensation of tax dollars is what I say

should be done.

One time a fellow hospitalized vet, who was dying of cancer, and I were

sitting on the shore of the Chesapeake Bay/Patapsco River commenting on how

sweet it was to have Ft. Howard VAMC located where we could go outside in

our hospital pajamas and get some fresh air in safety and privacy during our

traumatic medical experience. He looked at me and said, "Ya know why they

put this VA here? Up where I come from in Pennsylvania VA hospitals are all

way up on a hill somewhere or back in where there aren't too many people

around.

The government put us in out of the way places because people don't like to

see how ####ed up some vets are when they come back after wars."I don't

know. Ft. Howard was an old, obsolete army fort and was easily turned into a

VAMC at the beginning of WW II. It was way out in the sticks at the time

though.Now some VAMCs are in developing, sometimes crowded, prime real

estate markets.

The powers that be want to make money off of them.They say that they will

use that money for improving veterans health care.I say that I doubt that us

veterans will get a fair enough share of that money to actually improve our

VA health care services or to reasonably compensate us for the loss of the

healing, safe, peaceful privacy and beauty of VAMCs like the Ft. Howard,

Maryland and Livermore, California locations.

If the lease money from housing developments built on former VA hospital

grounds improves health care for veterans, then I will eat my words in front

of the Washington, D.C. Veterans Administration Regional Office at lunch

time.

David Robert Crews

2727 Liberty Pkwy

Dundalk, Maryland 21222

ursusdave@yahoo.com

http://magic-city-news.com/article_5560.shtml

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

They saved Waco last time and its back on the list. I wish they would close all the VA's and issue us ChampVA Insurance.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use