Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help Needed With What To Claim

Rate this question


willie 74

Question

Good evening everyone,

I am assisting another vet with his claim. Here is a little back ground. This vet was hit by a passenger car while on base when he was in the Marine Core. He suffered many injuries which I will list here shortly. They wanted to medically discharge him at the time but he was able to talk his commander in keeping him in since he was so young and wanted to do so. He was discharged later because his enlistment was up and he wanted out. He did not put a medical claim in until about 8 years later. To make this short he was given ten percent for hearing loss. I will copy and paste his injuries he sustained so you can see them. I will also appreciate if you can assist me in what he should be claiming for. thank you in advance and I will also post some questions.

Date of accident 28 June 1998

Diagnoses:

Acute Renal Failure, unspecified

Volume depletion

Closed fracture of dorsal thoracic vertebra

Closed fracture of unspecified part of fibula

sprain of medical collateral ligament of knee

sprain of cruciate ligament of knee

other disorder of muscle, ligament, and fascia

edema of male genital organs

Ok these injuries were from the accident in 1998. I will now post some statements from his medical paperwork dated 3 July 98. these statements are not in order, I just tried to post the important ones.

The patient was hit at 35 miles per hour on the left lower extremity and bilateral back, the patient denies loss of consciousness. The patient states that his extremity and back pain has progressed since discharge. Vertebral tenderness in t-12, difficulty in medial and lateral movements. X-rays revealed a t-12 compression fracture. CT of the abdomen showed bilateral striated nephrogram consistent with delayed excretion. No evidence of hematoma, urethra disruption, hydronephrosis. Slight ascites.

His left lower extremity was found to have a fibular fracture and torn mcl and acl. 30 days convalescent leave.

This is the only medical paperwork I have of his. Since leaving the military he has had several jobs, his injuries have cuaght up with him and prevent him from doing much work at all at this point. I tried to obtain his award letter of ten percent and what was denied but had no luck. He did not have any idea at the time how to file a claim and probably did it wrong. However I really want to help this vet out. I did my own claim with help and advise from fellow vets here and I am one hundred percent. I feel this vet is due for more than just ten percent for hearing loss.

​So I just need some insight on what he should claim, Major depressive disorder, and for his back I am not sure if it would fall under ddd or not. Just need help here. Thank you, thank you all for any insight..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Just for a start, he will need to request his C-file from the VA which should contain his original award letter and may or may not contain his SMRs from his military service and other evidence he submitted in his initial claim. He should also gather all relevant post discharge medical records from the VA or private medical providers.

If the veteran has the info or when you get it from his C-file, please post more info as to exactly what medical conditions were claimed in his original claim, list of evidence submitted, reason for denials of claimed medical conditions, etc. This will make it easier for Hadit members to give suggestions and opinions to help the veteran. Post as much info as possible. Any condition previously claimed and denied by the VA will require new and material evidence to reopen the claims for the denied conditions.

Depending on what info is already in his C-file or in his possession, he may need to obtain buddy statements from persons having knowledge of the 1998 accident, military accident reports, transcripts of legal proceedings related to the 1998 accident, documentation of proposed medical discharge and any other documentation related to the 1998 accident and the veteran's injuries from the accident.

Assuming he did not already obtain IMOs supporting his claims and once he has all relevant medical records in hand, he should go to his medical specialists who have treated him for his different medical conditions caused by the 1998 accident and ask them to provide IMOs. The specialists should review all of the medical evidence before preparing an IMO and rendering their opinions. The IMOs should meet the format and content requirements as shown in the IMO sample letter on Hadit.com. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Willie74:

Was the accident on or with a military vehicle and/or was a claim filed against an insurance company as a result of the accident if it's a civilian accident? The key issue is to show a service connection (if it exists and is warranted) and the evidence is very important in the matter. Showing a linkage, connection or what is commonly refered to as a "nexus" is very important to proving the case if it's military related. Frankly, I don't think that the military would be liable if the individual was in an accident with a civilian in a civilian vehicle despite the fact it occurred on a government or military installation? That said, I do know that one can make a or file a tort claim against the goiverenment but the chances of success are directly related to the incident and any extinuating circumstances like a faulty traffic light, vision blockage or any fault of the government that may occur? However, if the person was in the miltiary, drivng a military vehicle and an accident occurred, there would have been an accident report filed and that would be a key piece of evidence that would need to be obtained to support this case and any claims. Also, if it's clearly a military related accident, there probably would have been a line of duty (LOD) investiagation and obtaining that would be very important to getting to the fault of the incident and if someone was held responsbile as well which may impact on the ability to file a claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

If I am not mistaken, federal tort claims must be made within two years of the date the claimant became aware of the issue at hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Good advice above.

"Ok these injuries were from the accident in 1998. "

All of them you listed?

Did he claim them on the original claim he filed?

"I tried to obtain his award letter of ten percent and what was denied but had no luck."

The award letter would be in his C file.

It is hard to determine what he should file and whether they already denied anything above.

The award letter will have the info we need. His SMRs will have what he needs as well.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use