Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

Rate this question


Dolphin25

Question

I filed for a higher level of AA in 2008 along with a Special Home Adaption Grant.  In January 2015 the BVA granted me the SHA Grant and remanded the higher level of AA back to the RO.  A request for a new C&P was granted and in September 17, 2015 I was seen by the VA Hosp in Fayetteville, Arkansas.  The examiner was a Nurse and still in the Military, he was really kind and nice and since I was taken to the VA via a wheelchair van and had no one to push me he did so with out any problem.  I couldn't do anything, like stand, walk and needed physical help to get on the gurney.  I am unable to stand or walk or use my arms or hands to any degree as my disabilities are spinal related from a broken back in the service from a Helicopter crash.  I already receive SMC at the "M" rate b/c of a 100% rating and a 60% rating plus a whole lot of 10's 20's and 40's. I also receive the K rate. 

I received my C&P exam notes a few days after the examination that lasted all 15 minutes and from what I could read the only thing the RO or BVA wanted answered was concerning 2 letters from 2 Doctors about whether there was any conflict in whether or not I need to be in a residential facility or in my home.  Both Doctors stated that if I do not receive a higher level of AA then I should be housed in a residential facility to be better taken care of.  The examiner stated he did not find any conflict and that was basically it.

Here they granted me the SAH Grant:

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for entitlement to a certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring

specially adapted housing are met. 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 2101, 5107(b) (West 2014); 38

C.F.R. § 3.809 (2014).

Now the criteria for the SAH Grant are as follows:

For a certificate of eligibility for assistance in acquiring specially adapted housing, the

evidence must establish permanent and total service-connected disability due to: 1)

the loss, or loss of use, of both lower extremities such as to preclude locomotion

without the aid of braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair; or 2) blindness in both

eyes, having only light perception, plus the loss of use of one lower extremity; or 3)

the loss, or loss of use, of one lower extremity together with the residuals of organic

disease or injury which so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude

locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair; or 4) the loss,

or loss of use, of one lower extremity together with the loss, or loss of use, one upper

extremity which so affect the functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude

locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair; or 5) the loss

or loss of use of both upper extremities such as to preclude use of the arms at or

above the elbow; or 6) full thickness or subdermal burns that have resulted in

contractures with limitation of motion of two or more extremities or of at least one

extremity and the trunk. 38 U.S.C.A. § 2101(a) (West 2014); 38 C.F.R. § 3.809(b)

(2014).

After reviewing all the evidence and resolving any doubt in favor of the Veteran, the

Board finds that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities manifest in the loss of

use of one or both lower extremities as to preclude locomotion without the aid of

braces, crutches, canes or a wheelchair. 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.102, 3.809 (2014).

Therefore, entitlement to a certificate for assistance in acquiring specially adapted

housing is granted.

In the C&P exam notes the only question the BVA wanted answered is this:

COMMENTS:

In rendering the requested opinions, the examiner should

reconcile his or her opinion with the October 2010 letter from

Dr. Keller indicating that due to his chronic medical problems

absent twenty-four hour attendant care the Veteran would require

a long-term care placement and the January 2012 correspondence

from Dr. Lippert stating that the Veteran would probably benefit

from a higher level of care and absent such care, might require

hospitalization, nursing home care, or other residential

institutional care.

This is what the examiner wrote in response to the question sought:

Clarification:

In review, I did not see opinion or rational from Dr Keller in the VBMS or VA medical system records. There does not seem to be a conflict in the opinions or either provider that I can see. They both indicate that assistace would

be needed but Keller indicates this wasnt arranged he would need full time facility placement.  It should be noted that the client's wife, who was previously a RN and care provider, has significant medical problems and she herself is in need of

full time care support. Client states his daughter comes and helps them some, but he is paying out of pocket for caregiver to come in daily and help with meals and bathing. I personally am skeptical of the entire evaluation process

and would suggest an estensive in home Social worker evaluation for feedback on his and her abilities to live safely independantly vs need for long term care facility placement for both of them.

 

My question is since it looks as though I have met the criteria for the SAH Grant and the grant and the R-2 require both the same criteria,  then to me it stands to reason if I meet the one then I meet the other. 

Am I looking at this wrong???

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
    • JME earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • JME earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • JME earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • JME earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use