Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Confused on C&P NOTE

Rate this question


shawn55

Question

Hello, 

I just read the C&P note, this is confusing and I need an experts advice.  In 2011 I hurt my left knee during PT (exertion).  Shortly was notified for a deployment so I went to the doctor to get both my elbow and knee checked out and was told he doesn't have enough time so hurry and pick which injury I want to get checked out.  Told the dr. I felt something in back of my knee tear so he literally looked at my knee and told me to stretch and take some Motrin.  In Sep 2013, I separated from the military and in my separation physical all the injuries I told the dr. was not on the medical record and stated "patient claims his perfectly fine" however prior to the dr. appointment I had another appointment for my fatigue so I got my blood drawn.  Why would I tell the dr. I m perfectly fine if I went in for fatigue prior  sorry to get off subject when I filed for my claims in Dec 2013 claimed my knee was still hurting after I run, was told to stretch again.  Finally after complaining for years got an MRI done.

FINDINGS: There is a small joint effusion, particularly collecting along the lateral aspect of the knee, deep to the IT band. 

So I go to my therapy and was told it will be awhile before I can run again, I have to go to physical therapy 2x a month.  I reopened my claim for my knee and this is what my C&P exam note reads from PA:

Question:

Does the Veteran have a diagnosis of (a) LEFT KNEE CONDITION that is at least as
likely as not (50 percent or greater probability) incurred in or caused by
(the)

LEFT KNEE PAIN during service? Answer:
The veteran's C-file was reviewed.

Review of the veteran's available service and non-service treatment records
issilent for a diagnosis for a left knee condition. He was evaluated (11/15/2011) for worsening left knee pain that was diagnosed as a mild hamstring strain. This was a onetime evaluation with no follow up evaluations or complaint of left knee pain until 2 years 0 months 4 days later.

A hamstring injury typically causes a sudden, sharp pain in the back of your thigh or lower buttock and is felt when walking, straightening the leg, or bending over. You might also feel a popping or tearing sensation. Swelling and tenderness usually develop within a few hours. You may also experience bruising or discoloration along the back of your leg, as well as muscle weakness or an inability to put weight on your injured leg. The MRI obtained on the veteran's left knee (02/2016) is consistent with his complaint for posterior knee pain and not a typical hamstring injury. The veteran has an extensive history consistent with alcohol abuse with acute episodic alcohol intoxication and may have injured his left during one of these events. The veteran last reported alcohol use is (2013) the same time frame he voiced concerns to his Social Worker about experiencing left posterior knee pain. For this reason(s); it is less likely than not (less than 50 percent probability) that the veteran's present condition for left posterior knee pain is related to an in-service injury, event or illness. 

I no longer drink anymore, I quit in December 2013.  The consistent alcohol abuse happened when I was stationed in Korea, I was uncomfortable being around people so every time I was around lots of people I didn't know I drank to calm myself down later on turned out to be anxiety attack and was placed on medication.  
 
What does alcohol have to relate to my knee injury?  Thank you. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This is not a favorable C&P for you.  You are looking at an uphill battle.  The examiner got your alcohol abuse from something but I am not sure since I was not there nor privy to it.  The wording at the end of this exam really damages your claim.  Sorry I don't have better news.

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use