Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

PTSD Denied NSC - Schizophrenia NSC

Rate this question


VietnamVetSis

Question

ZERO Rating Decision received!  

  1. "The previous denial of service connection for PTSD is confirmed and continued.  The evidence does not show a current diagnosed disability".  
  2. "The previous denial of service connection for schizophrenia, residual type, competent is confirmed and continued.  The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service.  Your service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition.  The evidence does not support a change in our prior decision.  Therefore we are confirming the previous denial of this claim.

Doesn't being WIA with purple heart from grenade booby trap show an event and injury in service?   Furthermore, they made no mention of Agent Orange disabilities claimed (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, etc) even after I responded to 8 of their questions on this disability.   

They did concede 50% schizophrenia NSC as well as INCOMPETENT requiring my brother to engage me as Fiduciary.  Also gave him 40% combined for osteoarthritis and muscle strain SC for his wounds in arm, heel, and knee.   At least he'll get this money.   But I am utterly flabbergasted and discouraged that they would deny him the major PTSD and Schizophrenia claims.   Guess I'll be taking to higher authority now --- Berta, Bronco, anyone ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Will he give you permission to scan and attach the Reasons they gave here? And the evidence list?

(Cover c file prior to scanning it)

And also his last C & P exam they based this on?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

VVS:  Sadly, you/your brother are dealing with someone in the VA who has no common sense OR CLUE as to what they are doing!!

Its going to take a lot of research, but in the end, you/ your brother will prevail.

In Wilson V Drewinski (1991) "The regulations requires CONTINUITY OF SYMPTOMATOLOGY; NOT

CONTINUITY OF TREATMENT...

Yes, the WIA does show an event..etc...

 

As for your brothers IHD,  suggest you/he fill out your info on  va form 21-0960A-1 , and take it to your brothers cardio dr. and have him complete it.  I would also complete a VA 526-EZ (ASKING TO REOPEN A PREVIOUSLY DENIED CLAIM) and send it to the VA along with the 21-0960-A.

IMHO, you should FAX these forms to the VA INTAKE CENTER IN JANESVILLE,WI.  FAX# 844 822 5246 

BERTA/THES REST OF THE GANG WILL GET DOWN IN THE TRENCHES WITH YA....HANG IN THERE!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Berta - Here is the rating decision.   We will accept the disabilities granted for his battle wounds, but disagreement is with the PTSD and Schizophrenia being declined as service connected.   They were completely mute on the Agent Orange symptoms we claimed.   The C&P exam performed in April was not included with the VA papers.   I don't know what the Examiner said about his physical and mental condition.  

Need help on this:

  • Do I indicate acceptance of the 40% SC ratings decided on his battle wounds and also indicate we're filing a NOD with the NSC decisions for PTSD and Schizophrenia on the same "Statement in Support of Claim"?
  • I need to get an expert involved for our NOD and a new claim for Agent Orange since they completely overlooked that -- A rep at American Legion wants to take it on.   Do I go this route or go to an attorney?
  • Will QTC give me a copy of his exam?  Or do I need to go through the Request for VA treatment records again through Saint Louis Records?
  • I need to get him another dr exam to show evidence of his current Agent Orange symptoms.  Should i get an IMO ?
  • I want to make sure I am chosen as his Fiduciary -  there is a form for this that I presume I send in on line.

Rating Decision 5-16-16.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Were any AO disabilities claimed on the 21-526 form?

"I need to get an expert involved for our NOD and a new claim for Agent Orange since they completely overlooked that -- A rep at American Legion wants to take it on.   Do I go this route or go to an attorney?" I would let a rep look it over first.

  • "Will QTC give me a copy of his exam? " The VARO should be willing to release it to you with a formal request for it.

 

  • "I need to get him another dr exam to show evidence of his current Agent Orange symptoms"
  •  
  • Did the 5103 waiver or anything else from the VA  ask for more specific medical evidence of any claimed AO disabilities?

There were many personal statements from you in the evidence list.

VA often breezes over statements like that in favor of concentrating on any established medical evidence, such as formal diagnosis and treatment records..

I think you had mentioned here before that he had heart disease. Did they have any medical evidence to that affect?

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Furthermore, they made no mention of Agent Orange disabilities claimed (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, etc) even after I responded to 8 of their questions on this disability."

Sorry I missed that at first...they properly developed the 5103 waiver as far as I can tell.

The vet rep will want to see a copy of that and how you responded to it. 

The 40 % GSW rating is for what would obviously be a stressor. There must be something in the original denial that they would not re-open the PTSD claim for.

The Vet rep might well use this 40% rating as New and Material to the PTSD claim....

Your statements would be good as to symptomatology, but long standing serious symptoms have to  lead to documented medical care.

I concerns me that they did not defer the AO issue, but simply seemed to ignored it.

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What diagnosis does his current treating psychiatrist list? How about mental health treatment in the past--did they diagnose schizophrenia? PTSD? 

When did he first manifest symptoms of schizophrenia? When did he first receive treatment for schizophrenia?

Sorry to ask so many questions, but that information will help me and others to give you more specific advice. 

I agree with @Berta - you have a right to receive a copy of the C&P exam reports from VBA after the Rating Decision. Use VA FORM 3288 and either mail or fax it to the VBA Centralized Intake Center. If you mail it, do so in a way that gives you proof that it was received, e.g., U.S. Postal Service Signature Confirmation. If you fax the form, you will receive a fax receipt from the VBA centralized intake center.

I attached a copy of VA FORM 3288 with some tips for how to fill it out.

You can complete the form by printing it and then filling it out with a pen, or you can type your answers into the form, and then print it. Be sure to sign and date the form in ink. VA FORM 3288 is online at:

http://www.va.gov/vaforms/va/pdf/VA3288.pdf

All the Best,

Mark

VA3288-Request-for-Records-use-for-C-file_Requests.pdf

Edited by Mark D Worthen PsyD
clarity

Disclaimer: Any suggestions I offer here are based on my experience as a C&P examiner. In addition to asking questions on this board, I recommend that you consult with a veterans service officer, claims agent, or veterans law attorney before making major decisions related to your claim or appeal. 

Mark D Worthen PsyD | Forensic Psychologist | Charlotte, North Carolina | PTSDexams.net (educational site: no ads, no affiliate links)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use