Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Continued Exams- Please review for details

Rate this question


lfredrick123

Question

Here is the most recent CT Exam 

GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER

 

 

 

 

Adm: 6/6/2017, D/C: 6/6/2017

CT Chest Abdomen And Pelvis Wo Contrast]

Resulted: 06/06/17 1617, Result status: Final

result

Ordering provider:

Resulted by: MD

Performed: 06/06/17 1522 - 06/06/17 1539 Resulting lab: SVB STRESS SERVICES

Narrative:

CT OF THE CHEST, ABDOMEN AND PELVIS WITHOUT INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST

EXAM DATE AND TIME: 6/6/2017 3:22 PM

INDICATION: Lung mass. Vascular disorder of the kidneys.

TECHNIQUE: Routine CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis without IV

contrast. Dose reduction techniques were employed.

COMPARISON: None available.

FINDINGS:

CHEST:

Lungs: Evaluation lung bases is hindered by extensive respiratory

motion artifact. There is patchy left greater than right bilateral

lower lobe consolidations, consistent with pneumonia and/or

atelectasis. The upper lobes appear clear.

Mediastinum/Hila: There is mild cardiomegaly. Aortic valvular

calcifications are noted. Calcified plaque is seen in the aortic arch.

No mediastinal or hilar adenopathy. Tracheostomy tube appears in

satisfactory position.

Pleura: Tiny left pleural effusion.

Chest Wall: Right-sided VP shunt catheter is seen in the subcutaneous

right anterior chest wall, terminating in the right upper quadrant of

the abdomen.

ABDOMEN:

Liver: Normal size and homogeneous, without focal suspicious

parenchymal lesion.

Gallbladder/Bile Ducts: Few tiny calcified gallstones are seen

layering in the gallbladder, which otherwise appears unremarkable.

There is no biliary dilation.

Pancreas: The pancreas appears normal.

Spleen: The spleen appears normal.

Adrenals: The adrenal glands appear normal.

Kidneys: 3.3 cm simple left upper pole renal cyst. No hydronephrosis

or nephrolithiasis.

Bowel: Numerous colonic diverticuli are noted, without CT evidence of

acute diverticulitis.

Mesentery/Omentum/Peritoneum: The mesentery, omentum and peritoneum

appear normal.

Lymph Nodes: Lymph nodes appear normal. No adenopathy.

Vessels: Calcified plaque in the abdominal aorta, without evidence of

aneurysm.

Abdominal Wall: The abdominal wall appears normal.

PELVIS: Unremarkable urinary bladder. Unremarkable prostate gland. No

free air. No free fluid.

Printed on 6/8/2017 9:37 AM Page 1

GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER

200 Exempla Cir

Lafayette CO 80026

FREDRICK,GERALD W

MRN: S0406306

DOB: 2/28/1940, Sex: M

Adm: 6/6/2017, D/C: 6/6/2017

CT Chest Abdomen And Pelvis Wo Contrast [213904399]

(continued)

Resulted: 06/06/17 1617, Result status: Final

result

BONES: Multilevel degenerative changes in the lumbar spine are noted.

No destructive bony lytic or sclerotic osseous lesion.

IMPRESSION:

1. Patchy bilateral lower lobe left greater than right

consolidations, possibly representing atelectasis and/or pneumonia.

Evaluation of these regions are hindered by extensive respiratory

motion artifacts. Underlying mass, while considered less likely cannot

entirely be excluded. Follow-up chest CT suggested after resolution of

acute symptoms.

2. Right-sided VP shunt apparently in satisfactory position, tip

terminating right upper quadrant.

3. Cholelithiasis, without CT evidence of acute cholecystitis.

4. Diverticulosis, without CT evidence of acute diverticulitis.

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED:

 MD

6/6/2017 4:17 PM

Contributed By:

Printed

What do you see in this report? 

as compared to the initial finding in February?

 

02/19/2017 6:16 PM

Ordered By:

, MD

Result Status:

Final result

 

CT ABDOMEN AND PELVIS WO CONTRAST - Details

 

About This Test

The My Chart portal may not provide a complete representation of the laboratory test results in your medical record. 
If you have questions, please contact your physician. If the report is not complete, you may contact Health Information Management for a complete report.

·        Details

Narrative

HISTORY:
76M. Diarrhea. Noncontrast CT abdomen and pelvis with coronal
and sagittal reformats.
FINDINGS:
Mild basilar atelectasis.
Mild cardiomegaly.
Right abdominal ventriculoperitoneal shunt partially seen
extending along the liver.
Dependent cholelithiasis without pericholecystic inflammation.
Unremarkable spleen, adrenals, pancreas.
Retroperitoneal lipomatosis with mildly atretic kidneys.
Left renal 3.3 cm hypodense lesion with indeterminate density.
Diffuse fluid-filled stomach, small bowel, and large bowel
without evidence of obstruction compatible with infectious
gastroenteritis/enterocolitis and diarrhea.
Normal appendix, axial image 64.
Distal colonic diverticulosis without diverticulitis.
Central mesenteric misty appearance with subcentimeter lymph
nodes.
Unremarkable bladder.
No free fluid or free air.
Small fat-containing inguinal hernia is without inflammation.
Bowel seen immediately deep to the umbilicus.
No acute osseous finding.
IMPRESSION:
1. Diffuse fluid-filled stomach and bowel compatible with
infectious gastroenteritis or enterocolitis.
2. Indeterminate left renal 3.3 cm lesion, most, a hyperdense
cyst. Recommend all sound further evaluate if not stable on
prior exams.
3. Cholelithiasis.
4. Central mesenteric misty appearance with subcentimeter lymph
nodes most commonly associated with mesenteric panniculitis or
sclerosing mesenteritis. Consider 6 month follow-up CT abdomen.

 

Component Results

There is no component information for this result.

General Information

Collected:

02/19/2017 7:02 PM

Resulted:

02/19/2017 7:02 PM

Ordered By:

 MD

Result Status:

Final result

Help Please!!!!

Blood Testing

KAPPA/LAMBDA LIGHT CHAINS FREE WITH RATIO, SERUM
KAPPA LIGHT CHAIN, FREE, SERUM Reference Range: 3.3-19.4 (mg/L)     Actual  41.3 H


LAMBDA LIGHT CHAIN, FREE, SERUM Reference Range: 5.7-26.3 (mg/L)  Actual   24.2
KAPPA/LAMBDA LIGHT CHAINS FREE WITH RATIO, SERUM Reference Range: 0.26-1.65  Actual   1.71 H

 

DOB: 02/28/1940
Sex: M
Phone: 
Patient ID: 
Age: 77
Fasting:
Specimen: KS400824A
Requisition: 7737005
Report Status: FINAL / SEE REPORT
Collected: 05/31/2017 17:19
Received: 06/02/2017 06:23
Reported: 06/09/2017 05:21
Client #: 70300946

Quest, Quest Diagnostics, the associated logo, Nichols Institute, Interactive Insights and all associated Quest Diagnostics marks are the registered trademarks of Quest Diagnostics. All third party marks - '®' and '™' - are the
property of their respective owners. Privacy policy can be found at: http://questdiagnostics.com/home/privacy-policy/online-privacy.html. © 2017 Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. All rights reserved.

These results have been sent to the person that ordered the tests. Your receipt of these results should not be viewed as medical advice and is not meant to
replace discussion with your doctor or other healthcare professional.
Performing Sites
AMD Quest Diagnostics/Nichols Chantilly-Chantilly VA, 14225 Newbrook Drive, Chantilly, VA 20151-2228 Laboratory Director: Patrick W Mason M.D.,PhD
EZ Quest Diagnostics/Nichols SJC-San Juan Capistrano,, 33608 Ortega Hwy, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-2042 Laboratory Director: Jon Nakamoto
MD,PhD
THYROGLOBULIN
THYROGLOBULIN Reference Range: <0.1 (ng/mL)
Reference range applies to differentiated thyroid
cancer patients following treatment. The presence of
measurable thyroglobulin indicates the presence of
thyroglobulin-producing thyroid tissue. Clinical
correlation is advised.
This test was performed using the Beckman Coulter
Chemiluminescent method. Values obtained from
different assay methods cannot be used interchangeably.
Thyroglobulin levels, regardless
of value, should not be interpreted as absolute
evidence of the presence or absence of disease.
THYROID CANCER (THYROGLOBULIN) MONITOR
THYROGLOBULIN ANTIBODY Reference Range: <=1 (IU/mL)
This Thyroglobulin antibody test was performed
using the Beckman Coulter Immunoenzymatic method.
Values obtained from different assay methods cannot be
used interchangeably. Thyroglobulin antibody levels,
regardless of value, should not be interpreted as
absolute evidence of the presence or absence of
disease.
If the sample contains anti-thyroglobulin antibodies
of greater than 1 IU/mL, the presence of these
autoantibodies may cause falsely low thyroglobulin
values.
SEROTONIN, SERUM
SEROTONIN, SERUM Reference Range: 56-244 (ng/mL)
This test was developed and its analytical performance
characteristics have been determined by Quest Diagnostics
Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano. It has not been
cleared or approved by FDA. This assay has been validated
pursuant to the CLIA regulations and is used for clinical
purposes.
10.4 H


 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Moderator

Ok.  It looks like you will have to speak for him at the hearing, unless you have a representative.  I think the number 1 thing you need to accomplish at the hearing is to view the records, and compare it with YOUR records, to see if VA is "dealing with a full deck".  

If the VA is missing stuff, then request they add the records, hopefully you can just hand them to them.  

     If stuff is missing from your file at VA, then you are getting a "bad" deal, that is, they are dealing from the bottom of the deck.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Unfortunately,  the portions of the  exam  you posted does not say anything about your caluza elements, and you need those for Service connection for any of these disorders.  Look for these 3 things for service connection:

1.  Current diagnosis.  

2.  In service event or aggravation.

3.  Nexus, or docs statement that your (diagnosis) is "at least as likely as not due to (in service event) while in military service".  

After you get the caluza elements, you can look at "symptoms" to try to determine a rating.  

     These elements may well be in your Cfile.  You need to order a copy of your cfile to see if you have the above documented.     To get your "lung mass" or "kidney disorder" service connected you need the above.  Exception:  Secondary conditions.  If the doc says your "lung mass" or kidney disorder is a result of an already service connected ;condition, you wont need to AGAIN fulfill requirement number 2 above.  That is, if a condition is secondary to a SC condition, you dont need to again document an in service event or aggravation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bronco Vet thank you.   Here are the DBQ's done recently showing the diagnosis, also the IME, and I have affidavits signed by other vets attesting to seeing and breathing the heavy spraying, and a letter from the Col who was in charge of the Public Works Department that says they were using 2,4,5,T,Chlordane, Lindane,Malathion, Diasinon, DDT,DDE, and Nicotine Sulfate, throughout the base, and a fellow soldier in the same  unit in Germany on the HIDAL Subkit spraying at the border DBQ's for VA review.docx we were stationed. The Industrial Hygiene Survey that was done at the exact time I was there, that showed extensive levels of carbon monoxide and diesel fumes (benezene and other particulates), as well as noise levels all without protection and inexcess of limits,

This coupled with the above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The documents state that you "are unable to speak", and confined to a wheelchair with a stroke, that is, unless I read this incorrectly.  You also have CAD.   However, still missing from the documents you posted are at least 2 of the Caluza Elements necessary for service connection.  

The 3 Caluza elements are:

1.  Current diagnosis.  You apparently have that.  

2.  In service event or aggravation.  This is not documented in the documents you posted. 

3.  Nexus, or medical opinion that your diagnosis is "at least as likely as not" due to an in service event.  Again, I did not see a nexus in the documents you posted.  It could be in other parts of your file.  

     You need to order your cfile and see if all of the above are documented.  Im also more than a little disappointed your doctor seemed to suggest it does not affect your working.  How many people do you see out there working who are confined to a wheel chair and unable to speak???  Not many.  

      My opinion is that if you have, or can get documented all of these caluza elements you should be rated at 100%, and probably with SMC S or even SMC L.  (aid and attendance).  If you are confined to a wheel chair and cant speak, then you need some help, and probably can not leave your house alone.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I believe the DBQ's show the diagnosis. As well as the private records. There were error in the PA statements that I have already asked VA to ammend. First he is on continuous oxygen, and he has proxyimal a fib, and he has private ekg that showed a  AV Block on its readings twice, that they dont want to address. And because of the recurring infections, the damage to his lungs f rom exposures well documented and statements from many others about them. I believe we have all three. I have a nexus as well from IME , that states the stroke was caused due to hypertension that was shown in his service medical records. He also has arteriosclerosis, and he had a rupture due to weakened vessels due to hypertension. He also had a huge clot removed from the cerebellum as well as hemorrhaging. I am just wondering what else can be given or angle of attack here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Assuming you have the 3 Caluza elements documented, as you indicated, you may also be eligible for additional compensation for additional SMC's.  In other words, if you are confined to a wheel chair and cant use your legs, then you have "loss of use" of your legs.  Its possible, or even likely, that you have loss of use of other things, too.  You can/should look over this list and see if there are other "loss of use", items:

38 CFR 3.350 - Special monthly compensation ratings.

prev | next
§ 3.350 Special monthly compensation ratings.

The rates of special monthly compensation stated in this section are those provided under 38 U.S.C. 1114.

(a)Ratings under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k). Special monthly compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1114(k) is payable for each anatomical loss or loss of use of one hand, one foot, both buttocks, one or more creative organs, blindness of one eye having only light perception, deafness of both ears, having absence of air and bone conduction, complete organic aphonia with constant inability to communicate by speech or, in the case of a woman veteran, loss of 25% or more of tissue from a single breast or both breasts in combination (including loss by mastectomy or partial mastectomy), or following receipt of radiation treatment of breast tissue. This special compensation is payable in addition to the basic rate of compensation otherwise payable on the basis of degree of disability, provided that the combined rate of compensation does not exceed the monthly rate set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) when authorized in conjunction with any of the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1114 (a) through (j) or (s). When there is entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114 (l) through (n) or an intermediate rate under (p) such additional allowance is payable for each such anatomical loss or loss of use existing in addition to the requirements for the basic rates, provided the total does not exceed the monthly rate set forth in 38 U.S.C. 1114(o). The limitations on the maximum compensation payable under this paragraph are independent of and do not preclude payment of additional compensation for dependents under 38 U.S.C. 1115, or the special allowance for aid and attendance provided by 38 U.S.C. 1114(r).

(1)Creative organ.

(i) Loss of a creative organ will be shown by acquired absence of one or both testicles (other than undescended testicles) or ovaries or other creative organ. Loss of use of one testicle will be established when examination by a board finds that:

(a) The diameters of the affected testicle are reduced to one-third of the corresponding diameters of the paired normal testicle, or

(b) The diameters of the affected testicle are reduced to one-half or less of the corresponding normal testicle and there is alteration of consistency so that the affected testicle is considerably harder or softer than the corresponding normal testicle; or

(c) If neither of the conditions (a) or (b) is met, when a biopsy, recommended by a board including a genitourologist and accepted by the veteran, establishes the absence of spermatozoa.

ii) When loss or loss of use of a creative organ resulted from wounds or other trauma sustained in service, or resulted from operations in service for the relief of other conditions, the creative organ becoming incidentally involved, the benefit may be granted.

(iii) Loss or loss of use traceable to an elective operation performed subsequent to service, will not establish entitlement to the benefit. If, however, the operation after discharge was required for the correction of a specific injury caused by a preceding operation in service, it will support authorization of the benefit. When the existence of disability is established meeting the above requirements for nonfunctioning testicle due to operation after service, resulting in loss of use, the benefit may be granted even though the operation is one of election. An operation is not considered to be one of election where it is advised on sound medical judgment for the relief of a pathological condition or to prevent possible future pathological consequences.

(iv) Atrophy resulting from mumps followed by orchitis in service is service connected. Since atrophy is usually perceptible within 1 to 6 months after infection subsides, an examination more than 6 months after the subsidence of orchitis demonstrating a normal genitourinary system will be considered in determining rebuttal of service incurrence of atrophy later demonstrated. Mumps not followed by orchitis in service will not suffice as the antecedent cause of subsequent atrophy for the purpose of authorizing the benefit.

(2)Foot and hand.

(i) Loss of use of a hand or a foot will be held to exist when no effective function remains other than that which would be equally well served by an amputation stump at the site of election below elbow or knee with use of a suitable prosthetic appliance. The determination will be made on the basis of the actual remaining function, whether the acts of grasping, manipulation, etc., in the case of the hand, or of balance, propulsion, etc., in the case of the foot, could be accomplished equally well by an amputation stump with prosthesis; for example:

(a) Extremely unfavorable complete ankylosis of the knee, or complete ankylosis of two major joints of an extremity, or shortening of the lower extremity of 3 1/2 inches or more, will constitute loss of use of the hand or foot involved.

(b) Complete paralysis of the external popliteal nerve (common peroneal) and consequent footdrop, accompanied by characteristic organic changes including trophic and circulatory disturbances and other concomitants confirmatory of complete paralysis of this nerve, will be taken as loss of use of the foot.

(3)Both buttocks.

(i) Loss of use of both buttocks shall be deemed to exist when there is severe damage by disease or injury to muscle group XVII, bilateral, (diagnostic code 5317) and additional disability making it impossible for the disabled person, without assistance, to rise from a seated position and from a stooped position (fingers to toes position) and to maintain postural stability (the pelvis upon head of femur). The assistance may be done by the person's own hands or arms, and, in the matter of postural stability, by a special appliance.

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1114(k))
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use