Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Lemuel

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I need an FTCA attorney.  I have a Wyoming attorney willing to stand in as the Wyoming attorney for filing in the U S District Court for the Wyoming District.  Is any available frequenting this site or can I get a referral from someone.

The case involves prescribing a medication, Tegretol,  for "atonic seizures" that was contra indicated, made my condition worse and then the West Los Angeles VA RMC Seizure Clinic refused to change medications.  When It made me so bad, after 5 months, that I weaned myself off an quit the drug they still wouldn't provide a different drug and instead diagnosed me with "pseudo seizures" which cannot be done if there is a record of epileptiform spiking in an EEG as is the case.

From the Physicians' Desk Reference:  "

From the current online PDR, “Carbamazepine is not recommended for use in petit mal…” (absence) “… seizures, atonic seizures, or myoclonic seizures because it can exacerbate these conditions.  If a worsening of seizures occurs when therapy is initiated, this possibility should be considered.” (copywrite by PDR, LLC, 2017) This is exactly what happened to me and when I complained in the last of 1990 into 1991 the Seizure Clinic refused to change therapy.

Tegretol was approved in 1968.  It had 22 years of service before it was prescribed to me on a diagnosis of "Atonic seizures."  I'm not sure the warning in the current PDR was in the 1990 PDR but assume it was because of the years of service.

I lost approximately 32 years of optimum employability and employability.  My finale full time employment was in 1985 with a 2 year break to a part time job, that ended in 1990, which was essentially a charity job working for a business manager of a well know actor in Los Angeles.

The seizures are the result of an anterior temporal lobe injury in 1969 and went undiagnosed until 1985 and then untreated until confirmed in 1990.  Following the diagnosis of "pseudo seizures," I was untreated for seizures until August of 2015 with a drug I could tolerate.  No drug was tried until a private NB Ward physician tried Lamotrigine in April of 2014.  The immediate effect was great but in three days I developed Steven's Johnson's syndrome.  Keppra wasn't tried until August of 2015  here in Wyoming, and has been working very well.

I'm currently service connected for a TBI at 40% with a combined rating of 70% and granted TDIU from 2009 per a BVA Decision on May 11, 2017.  There is a remand in the decision that may take the TDIU back to either the claim in 1987 or the end of the part time employment if it is judged as "substantially gainful employment."  The pay was and there is a statement of the now deceased employer in the record stating that I was paid 4 days for 3 days work which I wasn't able to full fill and part of the work had to be shifted to another employee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Why not try this lawyer:

http://www.militarymedicalmalpractice.net/?_vsrefdom=mmm_google&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-antrLfL1wIVCf5kCh3HxQfyEAAYAyAAEgL_NvD_BwE

He can evaluate your case on line at the site.

This video will talk about the firm's experience with VA malpractice.

http://www.militarymedicalmalpractice.net/veterans

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I forgot to add, this is Archuleta Law Firm-  the link above-

Michael Archuleta is both an attorney And and a  doctor.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I hope you have an expert affidavit or your lawsuit will be dismissed before you even get to trial. The current online PDR means nothing. You need an expert affidavit from a medical professional in the same field. The medical professional can charge up to $5K for the affidavit. You probably need more than one expert because the US will have several experts. Then you would also have to pay the expert to testify at the trial which could cost around $15K. I doubt you can find an attorney without the expert affidavit. The attorney would need it when they file the lawsuit or they will be just wasting their time.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4124430063268083504&q=ftca+veteran+California&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

I filed my FTCA claim in July and my treating physicians aren't going to write me an affidavit for free. It takes them several hours to review all the VA medical records and write up an affidavit. The physicians charge $500/hour or more.  An expert is even more expensive. 

If your treating physicians works for the VA, they can't even help you due to conflict of interest. I have a two private physicians and I don't use the VA healthcare.

The case reference above is unheard of because the defendant usually motion for summary judgement before the trial to dismiss the case without prejudice for not having an expert. The plaintiff would have a short time to get an expert and amend his complaint. Instead, they let the plaintiff go to trial and plaintiff lost without an expert.

I doubt you can find an attorney who would waste their time and money trying to toll the FTCA Statute of Limitations back to 1988. You better learn about the California Statue of Repose for tort claim because it is one of the affirmative defense they are going to use against you. You have 3 years from the date of injury or one year from the date of discovery(which ever one occurs first). The 3 years from the date of injury would occur first barring your complaint. The US government can only be sued where by a private person would be able to be sued.

You discovered the injury back in 1988 when you filed for class action in the US District Court and it was dismissed without prejudice. How are you going to be able to toll it for almost 30 years from the time you discovered it.

 

Edited by Solo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Expect to pay a bunch for Attorney and expert witnesses.  Finale treatment and State of Filing is Wyoming.  Filing the tolling of the SOL based on title 28.  The VA is a multi state organization.  I can file where I live because they have an office here and this is the state I signed that "Enlistment Contract" in which is the basis of Wyoming Law.  Doesn't matter where it happened.

Mr. Bray claims a “legal disability” under Mr. Curtis’s cited Title 28, Section 2401 (a) of 3 years from August 15, 2015 instead of (b) and further claims a “Misrepresentation of Facts” under the citation of Title 41 in Title 28, Section 2401 (a); Section §7101 (9) definitions of Title 41.

Not only is there a misrepresentation of facts there are other deceptions and the repeated failure to provide the record referred to in other sections of the official RBA.

You don't seem to be an attorney, SOLO.  I'm not either but at least I look up the citations the other party is using to make sure they are not being deceptive.

And we are in a much different public climate which sways judges from what I understand.  I've been talking to attorneys who can't represent me because of Wyoming State Employment.  One was initially as negative as you are but has switched because of Title 38.  The primary goals of the VA and guarantees of the 14th Amendment Sec (4)(d).

Only costs me $500.00 to file and then let a Judge decide.  I'm not going to prejudge or let someone else prejudge for me.

Edited by Lemuel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta, Thanks!  I submitted a request to evaluate.

On ‎11‎/‎19‎/‎2017 at 1:06 PM, Berta said:

Why not try this lawyer:

http://www.militarymedicalmalpractice.net/?_vsrefdom=mmm_google&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-antrLfL1wIVCf5kCh3HxQfyEAAYAyAAEgL_NvD_BwE

He can evaluate your case on line at the site.

This video will talk about the firm's experience with VA malpractice.

http://www.militarymedicalmalpractice.net/veterans

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

FTCA in US District Court uses caselaws. Citations are for the Board of Veteran's Appeal and US Court of Appeals for Veteran Claim. Your claim looks more and more like a claim for disability benefits.

The 14th amendment is for suing the State and local government.  The 5th amendment is for the federal government.

The lawyer is a quack. He talk about his firm, but he doesn't mention himself. He probably has very little trial experience. I enter his name in the Google Scholar search for caselaws and his name is not mention at all in any FTCA cases.

If you sign up for a PACER account with the courts, then you could look at all the cases where he represented the plaintiff.  I wouldn't use this guy personally. 

Edited by Solo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use