Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Undergoing Development with an appeal claim

Rate this question


JFizzle

Question

Good day good people of Hadit.com.... I checked E-benefits today and got the following status on my Work in Progress link:

Undergoing Development : The Board has requested a medical opinion concerning a question involved in your appeal. You will receive a copy of this opinion and will be provided an opportunity to respond.

Obviously the board is asking for a medical opinion on my appeal, but I was wondering if anyone else had this status and to give any insight on what to expect. Thanks in advance.... 

 

JFizzle

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Chris Attig, a  great veterans lawyer, and hadit member , has this take on when the BVA requests a medical opinion;

https://www.veteranslawblog.org/va-medical-opinion-letter/

I am sure you mean a VHA opinion.

Not all VHA opinions, however, deny a claim:

In September 2015, the Board remanded this matter for additional development, to include obtaining an opinion as to the etiology of any current psychiatric disorder.  Thereafter, the Board, in August 2016, requested a VHA opinion as to the etiology of the Veteran's current psychiatric disorders and their relationship to his period of service.  The requested opinions were obtained in October 2016.  Subsequently, in March 2017, the Board requested an addendum to the October 2016 VHA opinion.  The requested addendum was provided later that month.  The requested development has been completed and the matter is ready for appellate review.  

It is noted that the Veteran's representative, as listed on the cover page of this decision, is retained per a May 2016 VA Form 21-22 under the limited circumstances of 38 C.F.R. §  14.630  (Authorization for a Particular Claim) and attested that "no compensation will be charged or paid".  In other words, the representative has agreed to not charge the Veteran for any services rendered with regard to his VA compensation claim. 
 
This appeal has been advanced on the Board's docket pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 20.900(c) (2015).  38 U.S.C.A. § 7107(a)(2) (West 2014).

The veteran was awarded their claim

https://www.va.gov/vetapp17/files4/1722634.txt

One thing about a VHA opinion is that it wil probably be requested from an expert in the field of the disability, which might well be far above the expertise  of the C & P examiner whose opinion denied the claim.

Personally- this is a different type of issue but the OGC requested a VHA opinion on my wrongful death claim.

The VHA opinion came from a cardio specialist and garnered a settlement conference right away.

I had no IMO at all but I  spent a llot of time studying cardiovascular disease and going over my dead husband's VA medical records and his autopsy and knew the VA  could not alter the medical facts of the case.

(they tried but to no avail)

 

 

I am sure you can find decisions at VA that were both denied and awarded due to VHA opinions.

Chris's reference to a  specific case in his vet blog link above shows how bizarre the VA can be.( and how capricious and arbitrary they can overlook estabished VA case law.

If you feel your claim is strong I would not worry about this yet.....

are they trying to find an opinion tyhat goes against a IMO/IME opinion you have?

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

While I agree with Berta, Im guessing the BVA is asking for a medical opinion prior to adjutication, and I have not yet seen that...only on remand, like Berta says.  

This COULD be a good thing...for the BVA to ask for a medical opinion instead of denying or remanding if the claim is lacking some evidence, such as a nexus. 

In the past, the BVA is not proactive, and they decide the claim on the available evidence, and sometimes remand it if they think there is a good chance that evidence will result in an award

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Does the BVA letter actually state  they are remanding the claim?

They can remand ( send it back) to the RO for another medical opinion (I assume you already had a C & P exam that denied the claim and that is the reason you appealed, and an additional opinion that might alter the outcome or maybe just clarify the initial C & P exam. Did you question the exam in the appeal? Or provide them with an IMO/IME?

Or they can remand the claim ( as they did in my AO DMII claim) for an additional opinion (I had 3 strong IMos , they had two against the claim and I rebutted the medical opinion they remanded for, as soon as I got a copy of it.

BVA agreed with my rebuttal and awarded.

I was poed at first because my evidence was overwhelming but then again- they had 2 against and wanted 3 against (because I had 3 IMOS- one was two brief sentences, a freeby) to even the score for Benefit of Doubt.

The link I gave said 'remand' ---but I think BVA ordered a VHA opinion -I need to read that case again-

Can you give us any more info as to whether the BVA letter actually said Remand?

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My point is that a VHA opinion is different from a remand to the RO, to get another C & P exam:

In part those guideine state:

"Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 VHA DIRECTIVE 1602 Transmittal Sheet February 19, 2016 MEDICAL REVIEW ASSISTANCE TO BOARD OF VETERANS’ APPEALS CASES 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive defines the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) process by which VHA provides medical reviews for the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) cases that require expert advisory medical opinions."

(expert advisory medical opinions-)

If you google BVA and VHA medical opinions

it will be the first pdf that pops up..

I think they are often requested by BVA for extraschedular consideration.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you Berta and Broncovet for the timely answer and thoroughness... and my apologies for getting back to this just now. 

My claim is a remanded claim, as I was only awarded partially almost a year ago for the complete claim. (Sorry for the confusion, I was thinking a remanded claim was encompassed with the term appeal and didn't know there was difference.) The claim went from with VLJ to undergoing development, which confused me because I have never seen anyone have this status nor could I find it in the search (google or hadit). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Ok.  I will be happy to explain.  When you first apply for benefits, you apply at the VARO.  If denied, you can appeal to the BVA.  The BVA can:  Award, Deny, or Remand.  A remand means that the appeal is "sent back" to the RO for "further development" and usually "instructions" compelled by the BVA.  

The RO is then required to comply with the remand and re adjuticate the claim, according to the BVA instructions.  

Again, the VARO, upon remand, can award or deny.  (There is no "RO Remand"..the BVA remands it TO the RO).  

The Veteran may then appeal to the BVA AGAIN.  Again the BVA can award, deny or remand.  If the board denys, the Veteran can get an attorney and he can appeal to the CAVC.  (you probably want an attorney at the CAVC).  The CAVC, likewise, can award, deny (they sometimes call it "affirmed", which means the CAVC agrees with the Board denial), or Remand.  

YOU CAN NOT APPEAL A REMAND.  However, sometimes the board may do something like this:

1.  The board awards the Veteran hearing loss. 

2.  The board denies the Veterans claim for depression. 

3.  The Board REMANDS  the Veterans TDIU claim for further development (and sometimes a  C and P exam)

     This means you can, in the above example, appeal the denial of depression, and you can also appeal the "effective date" of the Veterans hearing loss, but you can not appeal TDIU as it is not finally adjuticated.  You may only appeal a finally adjuticated claim and a remand is not finally adjuticated.  In other words you can appeal part of the BVA decision and not appeal other parts.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use