Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

SMC T Cases approved or denied at the board of veterans Appeals

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have a request. I would like to research all of the cases where the board of veterans appeals approved or denied SMC tea benefits. Apparently I have not been typing in the correct search results because I haven't found a whole lot of information. If someone has been able to find more information could you please post a link with some better results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Try other search terms, not "SMC tea".  Maybe the following is why you cant find anything:  

According to Hill and Pontoon (a well respected Veterans law firm), the old "TBI" has been done away with and replaced, as follows:  

https://www.hillandponton.com/va-special-monthly-compensation-for-veterans-with-tbi-smc-t/

Quote
Mary Klements, Claims Advocate

VA Special Monthly Compensation for Veterans with TBI: SMC t

March 28, 2015/in Veterans /by Mary Klements, Claims Advocate

At Hill & Ponton, we see many Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) cases. TBI is a condition that is prevalent among Afghanistan and Iraq veterans, who were often exposed to roadside bombs (IEDs), fire bombs, and other explosives. Some residuals of traumatic brain injury are apparent right away; others take longer to manifest.

In 2008, the VA did an overhaul of the rating system for TBI, and added a new section to the VA regulations – 38 C.F.R § 3.310. Under the new rating schedule, veterans can be compensated for TBI in the following categories:

  1. Emotional/Behavioral residuals
  2. Physical (neurological) dysfunction
  3. Subjective symptoms
  4. Cognitive impairment residuals

Under this recent over haul of the rating system for TBI, the VA also recognized that the costs associated with TBI-related care can be astronomical. The VA established a Special Monthly Compensation benefit specifically for TBI cases (SMC t), under 38 U.S.C.S. § 1114 (t). This benefit pays at the highest possible level of Special Monthly Compensation (SMC R-2), but without stringent requirements of the SMC R-2 benefit.

In order to be eligible for this type of special monthly compensation, the veteran must be able to prove that, due to TBI residuals:

  1. The veteran is in need of aid and attendance
  2. The veteran would require hospitalization, nursing home care, or other residential institutional care in the absence of regular in-home aid and attendance.
  3. The veteran does not otherwise qualify for a higher level of Aid & Attendance under 38 U.S.C.S. § 1114 (R-2).

In order to be considered in need of Aid & Attendance, the veteran must demonstrate:

  • Inability to dress/undress without assistance
  • Inability to keep clean and presentable without assistance
  • Inability to feed oneself without assistance
  • Inability to attend to the wants of nature
  • Exposure to hazards/dangers incident to daily environment

This special monthly compensation benefit pays at the same rate as SMC (R-2).

 

Dependent Status

R.2 Dependent Status

R.2

Veteran Alone $8,318.95 Veteran with Spouse and One Child $8,599.72
Veteran with Spouse $8,481.02 Veteran with One Child $8,427.34
Veteran with Spouse and One Parent $8,611.08 Veteran with Spouse, One Parent and One Child $8,729.78
Veteran with Spouse and Two Parents $8,741.14 Veteran with Spouse, Two Parents and One Child $8,859.84
Veteran with One Parent $8,449.01 Veteran with One Parent and One Child $8,557.40
Veteran with Two Parents $8,579.07 Veteran with Two Parents and One Child $8,859.84
Additional A/A spouse. $148.64 Add for Each Additional Child Under Age 18 $80.52
    Each Additional Schoolchild Over Age 18 $260.13
    Additional A/A spouse $148.64

Source: http://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/resources_comp02.asp

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use