Man I am really sit here try to figure this one out.
Ok here is the cavc remand.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the portion of the January 30, 2020, Board decision
finding that Mr. October 2018 NOD did not encompass that portion of the July 5, 2018,
rating decision granting a 70% evaluation, but no higher, for a psychiatric disorder is REVERSED
and the matter is REMANDED for further adjudication; the portions of the January 30, 2020,
Board decision denying an effective date before May 9, 2018, for the grant of SMC and entitlement
to SMC in excess of the housebound rate, from May 9 to July 17, 2018, and at the aid-and-
attendance rate from that point are SET ASIDE and the matters are REMANDED for further
development, if necessary, and readjudication consistent with this decision; and the balance of the
appeal is DISMISSED.
DATED: January 29, 2021
Ok now the board change the cavc order and granted the same effective dates set a side by the court.
An remand them To be granted in the first instance.
So the board volate the court order.
The cavc set them a side an told the board to address early period.
So now the droc DC just used the nod that was send to me to continue my appeal.
An remove the issue from the cavc remand docket which is to be expidate and return to the board.
An now it's in the new appeal system I never check the box to opt in. Smh.
An now been treated as a new appeal with a docket of 2021. In the new appeal system
This is part of my petition for extraordinary relief.
The Board response to the court.
They it ok to change my docket. Lol that was it.
Told the court that the board found that they need to be granted in the first instance.
So now I guess the board doesn't have to follow cavc remand order now. Smh
It's been with judge almost 7 weeks.
And it with the chief judge the same judge who did my case an set it a side.
And the judge was part of the grove cavc decision.
I even ask the court to sanction the veterans affairs for this.
I can't let this go because I didn't fight all the way to court.
Question
Mr cue
Man I am really sit here try to figure this one out.
Ok here is the cavc remand.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the portion of the January 30, 2020, Board decision
finding that Mr. October 2018 NOD did not encompass that portion of the July 5, 2018,
rating decision granting a 70% evaluation, but no higher, for a psychiatric disorder is REVERSED
and the matter is REMANDED for further adjudication; the portions of the January 30, 2020,
Board decision denying an effective date before May 9, 2018, for the grant of SMC and entitlement
to SMC in excess of the housebound rate, from May 9 to July 17, 2018, and at the aid-and-
attendance rate from that point are SET ASIDE and the matters are REMANDED for further
development, if necessary, and readjudication consistent with this decision; and the balance of the
appeal is DISMISSED.
DATED: January 29, 2021
Ok now the board change the cavc order and granted the same effective dates set a side by the court.
An remand them To be granted in the first instance.
So the board volate the court order.
The cavc set them a side an told the board to address early period.
So now the droc DC just used the nod that was send to me to continue my appeal.
An remove the issue from the cavc remand docket which is to be expidate and return to the board.
An now it's in the new appeal system I never check the box to opt in. Smh.
An now been treated as a new appeal with a docket of 2021. In the new appeal system
This is part of my petition for extraordinary relief.
The Board response to the court.
They it ok to change my docket. Lol that was it.
Told the court that the board found that they need to be granted in the first instance.
So now I guess the board doesn't have to follow cavc remand order now. Smh
It's been with judge almost 7 weeks.
And it with the chief judge the same judge who did my case an set it a side.
And the judge was part of the grove cavc decision.
I even ask the court to sanction the veterans affairs for this.
I can't let this go because I didn't fight all the way to court.
To fight the same effective dates over again.
Lol I am venting again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
Popular Days
Oct 26
5
Oct 25
1
Top Posters For This Question
Mr cue 4 posts
broncovet 2 posts
Popular Days
Oct 26 2021
5 posts
Oct 25 2021
1 post
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now