Believe it of not, when I volunteered back in 1975, I had gone in with 3 Knowles (screw Pins) pins in my left hip.
The pins were in place, due to an earlier in life, greater trochanter neck garden 3 variety. It healed well.
I ended up injuring that hip in the service. I was awarded 10% from the VA.
One pin appeared to have penetrated the Acetabular (joint space) and was damaging the the socket. In 1977, I was operated on by a VA doctor (quack) and he had removed the retaining nuts, clipped the pins even with the bone and called it a day. The penetrating pin was still in the joint. When I spoke with the doctor, he had stated that he could NOT remove the pins from the bone. So instead, he removed the fasteners, and clipped the pins to the bone. His INCOMPITENT procedure, has been described by another doctor as "Unorthodox" at best.
Thus, MY claim for an 1151
In a few months, the pins are taking their toll. It appeared through x-ray that another pin was entering into the joint space.
Now...what makes this interesting, is that these "Prosthetic" devices are starting to shift. There is a statute which covers for a shifting prosthetic device, BUT that isn't a pin, is it? Isn't that established primarily for a THR?
Can I amend a law which would cover ANY FOREIGN BODY surgically implanted (eg: pins, plate, screws, etc.)?
OR....
Is there one in place, but I failed to see it.
One last issue...
Is it considered "Unothodox" to remove the nuts from the pins? The Knowles pins and nuts are a KIT. Zimmer is the manufacturer of these pins. Can the pins be installed without the nuts? Does anybody here know of an Orthopedic surgeon that knows the answer to this? Nobody wants to answer my question, in fear of having to appear in court!
Question
hollywoodnc
Believe it of not, when I volunteered back in 1975, I had gone in with 3 Knowles (screw Pins) pins in my left hip.
The pins were in place, due to an earlier in life, greater trochanter neck garden 3 variety. It healed well.
I ended up injuring that hip in the service. I was awarded 10% from the VA.
One pin appeared to have penetrated the Acetabular (joint space) and was damaging the the socket. In 1977, I was operated on by a VA doctor (quack) and he had removed the retaining nuts, clipped the pins even with the bone and called it a day. The penetrating pin was still in the joint. When I spoke with the doctor, he had stated that he could NOT remove the pins from the bone. So instead, he removed the fasteners, and clipped the pins to the bone. His INCOMPITENT procedure, has been described by another doctor as "Unorthodox" at best.
Thus, MY claim for an 1151
In a few months, the pins are taking their toll. It appeared through x-ray that another pin was entering into the joint space.
Now...what makes this interesting, is that these "Prosthetic" devices are starting to shift. There is a statute which covers for a shifting prosthetic device, BUT that isn't a pin, is it? Isn't that established primarily for a THR?
Can I amend a law which would cover ANY FOREIGN BODY surgically implanted (eg: pins, plate, screws, etc.)?
OR....
Is there one in place, but I failed to see it.
One last issue...
Is it considered "Unothodox" to remove the nuts from the pins? The Knowles pins and nuts are a KIT. Zimmer is the manufacturer of these pins. Can the pins be installed without the nuts? Does anybody here know of an Orthopedic surgeon that knows the answer to this? Nobody wants to answer my question, in fear of having to appear in court!
thanks!
hollywoodncatmpr@yahoo.com
Edited by hollywoodncLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
Popular Days
Oct 19
2
Top Posters For This Question
JR Reihs 1 post
hollywoodnc 1 post
Popular Days
Oct 19 2005
2 posts
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts