Take a look at this DBQ opinion

[Whodat]

Opinion. IT is the option that the veteran does have bilateral knee conditions that are less than likely than not proximate due to or result of bilateral Pes planus and bilateral plantar fasciitis.

Rationale. The veteran has a specific diagnosis for the left knee as mentioned and the right knee has a dx of recurrent strain. From the history these are related to specific injuries in service and not to the pes planus and Plantar fasciitis.

 

I am not the sharpest tool in the shed and I do understand the less than likely statement means a denial but the MD stated related to injuries while in service.

Shouldn't that carry some weight?

[Whodat]

On 11/13/2022 at 10:13 PM, jamescripps2 said:

It could be that you inadvertently tried to diagnose your condition and even offer the etiology at the time that you filed your claim, but you are not expected to be the expert. If I was you I would consider that medical opinion as the doctor trying to help you make the connection in order service connect your knees. Although it may need some further development, it is favorable to you, and I would be happy with it.

I would also think that the doctors statement would be enough for a VSR or rater to initiate further development or at least invite you to file the claim based upon that statement by the doctor.

Good to know. However, the VSR or rater did not do anything. I am assuming that they are waiting for my HLR or appeal.