Ok many be thinking I go to far well I found a legal problem that the cavc must address.
I believe they have to make percendent on this. I am a little shook now lol.
Ok here it is the Cavc remand your case to the bva.or the VA make you do a new VA form 9 or nod.
Does this mean.you start over the appeal process or is it still treat as a cavc remand.
The VA are changing docket numbers removing veterans from legacy appeal to ama. I just got a new 23 docket number. It's crazy.
I have been at this for a min I will have the. Motion done this weekend.
Listen they granted the panel with not written decision. An told me I can now request full court. This is we're percendent is made.
Ok let me get my a game together on this one guy's. I might get the court to come down on VA on this one.
I believe the court is going to make the va respond again.
I will post a bva response that they just send to me. It about to get real.
Man I am fighting 3 different appeal at the same time and they refuse to merge them back together. I am a little happy today.
The VA is about to get my n there job with my cavc remand now.
In a January 4, 2023, order, the Court denied the self-represented petitioner's November 21, November 22, December 2, December 16, and December 22, 2022, construed motions for leave to file a reply to the Secretary's July 18, 2022, response. The Court further ordered that the petitioner's January 2, 2023, motion to expedite proceedings is dismissed as moot, and the Court denied petitioner's October 5, 2022, petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. On January 5, 2023, the petitioner filed a motion for a reconsideration or, in the alternative, for full Court review. The Court liberally construes the motion for reconsideration as a motion for single-judge reconsideration and panel review in the alternative. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(b). The motion for decision by a panel will be granted. Additionally, the Court notes that motions for a decision by the full Court in a case decided only by a single judge are not permitted. See U.S. Vet. App. R. 35(c). Hence, the appellant's request for full Court review of the January 4, 2023, order is premature and will not be considered. The appellant is free to refile his motion for full Court review within 21 days of the date of this order. See U.S. Vet. App. R. 35(d)
Question
Mr cue
Ok many be thinking I go to far well I found a legal problem that the cavc must address.
I believe they have to make percendent on this. I am a little shook now lol.
Ok here it is the Cavc remand your case to the bva.or the VA make you do a new VA form 9 or nod.
Does this mean.you start over the appeal process or is it still treat as a cavc remand.
The VA are changing docket numbers removing veterans from legacy appeal to ama. I just got a new 23 docket number. It's crazy.
I have been at this for a min I will have the. Motion done this weekend.
Listen they granted the panel with not written decision. An told me I can now request full court. This is we're percendent is made.
Ok let me get my a game together on this one guy's. I might get the court to come down on VA on this one.
I believe the court is going to make the va respond again.
I will post a bva response that they just send to me. It about to get real.
Man I am fighting 3 different appeal at the same time and they refuse to merge them back together. I am a little happy today.
The VA is about to get my n there job with my cavc remand now.
In a January 4, 2023, order, the Court denied the self-represented petitioner's November 21, November 22, December 2, December 16, and December 22, 2022, construed motions for leave to file a reply to the Secretary's July 18, 2022, response. The Court further ordered that the petitioner's January 2, 2023, motion to expedite proceedings is dismissed as moot, and the Court denied petitioner's October 5, 2022, petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. On January 5, 2023, the petitioner filed a motion for a reconsideration or, in the alternative, for full Court review. The Court liberally construes the motion for reconsideration as a motion for single-judge reconsideration and panel review in the alternative. See U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(b). The motion for decision by a panel will be granted. Additionally, the Court notes that motions for a decision by the full Court in a case decided only by a single judge are not permitted. See U.S. Vet. App. R. 35(c). Hence, the appellant's request for full Court review of the January 4, 2023, order is premature and will not be considered. The appellant is free to refile his motion for full Court review within 21 days of the date of this order. See U.S. Vet. App. R. 35(d)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
Popular Days
Feb 9
3
Feb 10
2
Top Posters For This Question
Mr cue 3 posts
ArNG11 2 posts
Popular Days
Feb 9 2023
3 posts
Feb 10 2023
2 posts
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now