Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

TDIU

Rate this question


Spaceace1954

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@relatively happy camper That's quite a win you received. Some kinds of SMC are supposed to be inferred where the VA automatically assesses and grant if the vet meets the criteria. However, it is tough enough for vets to be lucky enough to get SMC evaluated let alone vets properly understand that they can also ask for it if overlooked. From what I have read over the past few years, it is being examined more now, but I assume that is likely due to newer processes and computer programs that remind the raters to check for it under certain circumstances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Founder
14 hours ago, relatively happy camper said:

pacmanx1 - you may be correct but anytime a claimant gets a 100% he/she/them /they should request SMC "S."  I would never expect the VA to award something that wasn't applied for, as much as they fight you on every step of the way.  Took me 10yrs on my claim but I won 100% schedular (first 30%, then 50%, then 70% then TDIU, then 100%), then another 20yrs for the SMC "s" award but everything went back to my original claim date, in '89.  They fought SMC "s" all the way but the BVA judge found an evaluation in my original award that justified SMC "s."  I'd probably been to the BVA 5x by then and 2x at the court.  

😃 Fantastic @relatively happy camper

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

@relatively happy camper Congratulations all the way around! That's a seriously long time to have to wait for them to get it right. You are correct though about vets rarely getting correct decisions. In my experiences, about 10% of my claims were properly rated and assigned the correct effective date. Everything else required numerous submissions, NODs, supplemental, HLR, and/or BVA appeals for them to get them corrected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Community Owner
On 4/29/2024 at 5:49 PM, relatively happy camper said:

pacmanx1 - you may be correct but anytime a claimant gets a 100% he/she/them /they should request SMC "S."  I would never expect the VA to award something that wasn't applied for, as much as they fight you on every step of the way.  Took me 10yrs on my claim but I won 100% schedular (first 30%, then 50%, then 70% then TDIU, then 100%), then another 20yrs for the SMC "s" award but everything went back to my original claim date, in '89.  They fought SMC "s" all the way but the BVA judge found an evaluation in my original award that justified SMC "s."  I'd probably been to the BVA 5x by then and 2x at the court.  

For clarity I have to point out that you have to meet the criteria for SMC S. You just don't get it because you are 100%. For example, you are 100% and housebound etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Rattler said:

For clarity I have to point out that you have to meet the criteria for SMC S. You just don't get it because you are 100%. For example, you are 100% and housebound etc.

You are correct, however, if you receive a 100% rating, the VA was and I believe still is required to consider an SMC "s" award, for either A&A or HB.  Failure to decide that leaves that claim open.  That's why I was able to pursue and win mine.  My original award was a 100% schedular rating, 9/99.  My original claim date was 4/89 and final award date was 9/99.  They failed to consider HB or A&A, in my award decision, so I decided to go after it.  I had hoped to get to the court again and get it decided on the 100+60% rule not using the ratings table but just using regular addition, instead.  I wanted a court decision on using the ratings table against the claimant, since a claimant is already 100% disabled and shouldn't be penalized again.  It appears, to me, the VA avoids a court decision on this by awarding the claim thru some other means.   Both my claims were awarded retro to 4/89.  jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use