Jump to content
HadIt.com Anniversary 24 years on Jan 20, 2021 ×
HadIt.com Anniversary 24 years on Jan 20, 2021


HadIt.com Elder
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Donations


Vync last won the day on August 31

Vync had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,990 Excellent

About Vync

  • Rank
    E-9 Master Chief Petty Officer
  • Birthday October 15

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Military Rank
  • Location
    Ft.Living Room, AL
  • Interests
    Family, fishing, movies, video games, gardening, hot rods, computer programming, electronics, music

Previous Fields

  • Service Connected Disability
  • Branch of Service

Recent Profile Visitors

6,073 profile views
  1. I believe this is solely centered around the numbers. Veterans complain the VA takes too long to process claims. Outsourcing results in quicker turnaround times and makes the numbers better for the VA. The problem is there is zero accountability with contracted examiners. In my case, LHI did a C&P exam earlier this year and completely ignored very favorable evidence (specialist IMO). LHI management said they simply train examiners and schedule exams. The VARO rubber stamped what the examiner said which proved their "quality" review lacked substance. The VA's answer to substandard
  2. Excellent! Congratulations!
  3. I had an LHI exam earlier in the year after filing a supplemental claim, but the examiner was sloppy, resulting in a denial that I had to appeal via HLR. I received a FedEx letter a week prior telling me info about the examiner's experience and credentials. It also indicated the names of the services requested by the VA. In my case, the VA requested a cardiology exam. The examiner, a nurse practitioner, called and spent about 10 minutes on the phone. An in-person exam was not necessary because I recently had a full heart workup at the VA. They asked about a heart rhythm issue that was pre
  4. Keep in mind that some offices might be in the DEERS catalog, but they may not necessarily make ID cards. My recommendation is to call before you go. Here is an online link to find offices near you: https://idco.dmdc.osd.mil/idco/locator
  5. Ranmic, It's just a way that the VA determines if your rating will be deemed as protected. There are a lot of factors that go into it, such as age, type of disability, disability percentage, service connection status, etc... When you reach a level of rating protection, the VA doesn't tend to come out and tell you. However, it is good to know about in cases where the VA might suddenly proposes to reduce a rating. They will send you a letter in writing and give you a certain amount of time to respond and explain why the rating should be continued. That doesn't mean they will get it right
  6. Please feel free. I can provide some additional information to you very soon.
  7. @blahsaysme2u I requested mine in December 2019. Currently, there is no longer an ETA on va.gov of when I call the Peggy puppets. I think I might engage my Congressional rep to see if they can get mine moving along.
  8. @CapnHaddockYou are correct in the fact that the VA try will fight this all the way. I sort of spearheaded this effort recently. Being 100% P&T, I filed for this some years ago, but the VA also denied the free coverage because I was also still employed. In 1996, per the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the VA moved their regulations into departmental policies under M29-1 Chapter 16. They asserted that "for life insurance purposes" the VA's definition of "totally disabled" meant "unemployable", despite what the VA defined in 38 CFR 3.340. Apparently, there was some sort of division between
  9. Still happening to me. It either goes into an endless loop trying to load (nothing being displayed), loads partially then freezes, or takes a very long time to load. Tried Chrome and Edge. Flushed cache. Still happening.
  10. @GBArmyIn this case, a new doctor's opinion cannot be introduced due to the CUE restrictions. I looked up the M21-1's CUE policies/procedures and found: A claimant is not entitled to request CUE again once there has been a final decision denying CUE on the same basis. If the CUE alleged is different from a CUE issue previously rejected, use a rating to determine whether or not a CUE was made on the new issue. If they followed their own policies/procedures, they would have considered functional loss/impairment which should warrant an increase. At least that's how I read it.
  11. The CUE I submitted last year was denied in January. I submitted a HLR asserting a CUE contention that the VA failed to properly apply functional loss/impairment per 4.40 and 4.45 and award a rating higher than 10%. The HLR denied CUE occurred, again relied solely on the maximum ROM, but made no mention of my contentions that functional loss/impairment per 4.40 and 4.45 were not properly applied. Initial exam This exam was a crap shoot, but at least they were able to confirm it was in the record. A reasonable person would have used objective math to divide 35 mm by 2 resulting in
  12. If you have a VSO, they can go into VBMS and obtain a copy of the letter. My VSO was able to do this for me and read off the retro amounts and the basics of the decision. I drove by his office and picked up a copy. Once you have a copy of the letter in hand, you can discuss it with the Peggy agents, if necessary. They don't need to know you obtained it from your VSO. I hope the letter contains really good news...
  13. If you have a VSO, perhaps they can access VBMS and obtain the requested documents. I have gone this route numerous times. Otherwise, if you mailed a letter requesting certain documents, the COVID-19 situation has introduced a significant delay. I In December 2019, I requested a copy of my claims file. It had an Aug 2020 delivery estimate, but now they took that estimate off completely.
  14. Due to the inclusion of "possible verification", that sounds like a scripted catch-all response.
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines