Jump to content

Vync

HadIt.com Elder
  • Posts

    5,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    112
  • Donations

    $0.00 

Vync last won the day on June 24

Vync had the most liked content!

About Vync

  • Birthday October 15

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Military Rank
    E-4
  • Location
    Ft.Living Room, AL
  • Interests
    Family, fishing, movies, video games, gardening, hot rods, computer programming, electronics, music

Previous Fields

  • Service Connected Disability
    100% P&T
  • Branch of Service
    Army

Recent Profile Visitors

7,002 profile views

Vync's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

2.1k

Reputation

9

Community Answers

  1. @pacmanx1 That kind of decision makes me shake my head like I have done so many times in the past. Reminds me of "Friday filing". If they want to go home, they just intentionally misfile or state they cannot find what you know is there, just so they can go home on time. Of course, because everything occurs behind the magic veil, we cannot prove it. The VA's answer is to just send you to the end of the line so we can wait again. Makes me really miss the days when you could submit a request for reconsideration and it goes back for them to do it right without waiting months all over again.
  2. If you have a POA with an accredited VSO, contact them. They should be able to look in the system and get you a copy.
  3. Hey @Berta, The "unforseeable event" approach per Ollis v. Shulkin sounds very intriguing. Not to take away from the original post, but I am curious if the "unforseeable event" approach might be able to be applied elsewhere. For example, as part of an FTCA or to obtain SC or an increase... The VA cardiologists told me that they did not feel the migraine meds I was given would cause a heart attack was very rare due to the very low statistical chance. Sounds like an "unforseeable event" to me because nobody expected it to happen. I am now SC for the heart attack thanks to an "more likely than not" IMO by a non-VA specialist, so I am glad you recommended getting an IMO. My FTCA for it has been in the hopper since early April, but I have only received the usual form letter saying it has been received. A while back, I remember us talking about the possibility of getting separate benefits for 1151 when already SC for the same disability. Everyone I talked to at the VA and a couple of law offices said that if I am already SC for a condition then filing an 1151 for the same condition would be moot and not provide any additional benefits. Have you heard if it is possible to do this and if there have been any successes? Back to the original post, I helped a veteran a while back and his VA referred him to community care for back surgery. His surgical wound got infected and required more surgeries to clean it out. He is still suffering in a bad way. He is already SC for his back, but wonder if he might be able to file an 1151 under the Ollis v. Shulkin approach.
  4. Here's a link to the Treasury Department's page: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/homeowner-assistance-fund As info, it does not indicate if VA disability and/or Social Security/SSDI payments how factor into income.
  5. I'm with @broncoveton this. In my experience, an IMO may be needed depending on the circumstances. For an increase, generally you would just need medical evidence showing you worsened and meet the requirements for the next higher level of disability. Just keep in mind the VA may grant increases with a caveat stating your increased is considered temporary and will be re-examined in the future because you are expected to improve. If you are already P&T, TDIU, or meet certain criteria limiting future exams, the VA may just opt to increase w/o a future exam. Otherwise, if an IMO and/or your medical evidence or your provider states you are not expected to improve, the VA may opt against saying it is a temporary increase.
  6. Hey @bionoce, I personally have not had one, but I did find this information sheet on the VA's web site: https://www.va.gov/HEALTHPARTNERSHIPS/docs/SGBforPTSD_508.pdf The sheet says it may be an option for vets who meet certain requirements. I would recommend you ask your VA provider about it. If you end up getting it, please consider sharing your experience both short and long term. It might be helpful for others.
  7. @pacmanx1 I have been getting those opinion surveys over the past two years. For every one of mine, there is always one major flaw to them: It does not indicate the date and time of the call. In one case, I called Peggy three times in one day, but no other times during the month. One of the calls was with Gomer Pyle who didn't seem like they wanted to help, but the other two were extremely helpful. I got only one survey and had no idea which call might have triggered it. I report this to the VA every time via Peggy and WH VA Hotline, but to date it has not been fixed. Got another one like it a month ago.
  8. @broncovetI completely understand. But with the VA taking a more form-oriented approach over the past couple of years, I found it better to err on the side of caution. I am helping a Vietnam veteran who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism and Parkinson's like symptoms. He did the ITF after the new presumptive law went into effect. I had called Peggy to ask if they were processing them as presumptive and was told no. With my personal experiences on new and supplemental claims over the past couple of years, I realize that it is a gamble for them to actually get it right. Now that the VA announced they are now processing the new presumptives, he is filing the actual new claim. Didn't want him to file for it last year, go through the C&P red tape, get a denial only to file again after the laws changed and do it all over again. For veterans with high combined ratings, they may be less concerned about the VA getting the effective date right because new ratings of like 10% or so may not bump their combined rating up at all. This vet only has a 10% rating, so I did not want him taking chances on the amount of potential retro.
  9. Don't forget the extremely important "Intent to File" process. It is crucial to preserving a potential effective date while wading through VA red tape and attempting to collect medical records, buddy letters, and other correspondence before actually initiating a new claim, including survivors pension and DIC. https://benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/factsheets/general/intenttofile.pdf If filing a claim for increase, simply go through your medical evidence over the past 12 months and see if you can find proof that you qualify for the next higher level of disability. It's a good idea to do your homework on these up front, if possible, so you have hard evidence for them to verify. If your condition or the next higher level of disability is deemed temporary and expected to improve, I recommend you ask around or check with a VSO for advice before doing this.
  10. After getting SC, I had a claim hung up in the system for a year due to typical VA red tape. The VA sent me to a new exam to determine the current level of disability and perform a functional assessment. When I got my rating, it was staged. They gave me the level of disability at the time I was granted SC, but then increased it due to worsening severity that was recorded in the recent exam.
  11. @Buck52 I hope your wife has a successful recovery! Prayers!
  12. The VA used to give me three cleanings a year due to the kind of TMJ I have. Over the past few years it went to two, then one, then none when COVID hit. They approved me to get them done via community care at a nearby provider. Although the VA claims I am authorized for two per year, the actual referral only authorizes one. Go figure...
  13. It could be just a standard statement. I assume the VA requests any disability medical records which may be present with Social Security Administration, who they sends the VA a letter saying they have nothing.
  14. @broncovetoffers good advice. HLR is definitely more like a CUE, but you do not have all the extra restrictions of a CUE unless you submitted a CUE and then it was handled via supplemental or HLR. I actually won a CUE that was submitted as a supplemental, which was very surprising. HLR does tend to deliver a decision considerably faster, but I have had a 50/50 success/fail rate with HLRs. I attribute the failures to the reviewer being familiar with, but not necessarily an expert in VA laws/regs.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines