Jump to content

Ads



How to get your questions answered.

All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

Tips on posting on the forums.

  1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ ...
  2. Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title ... 
  3. Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help ...
Continue Reading


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Search



  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Cruinthe

My Dro Statement Of The Case, For Lack Of A Better Term

Question

Glenn XXXXXX

7557 XXXXXXXX

Roanoke, Virginia

2XXXX

XXXXXXX

(540)204-XXXX

This is a clarification of the issuesto be introduced during the Decision Review Officer hearing to beconducted at the Roanoke Virginia Veterans Affairs Regional Office onAugust 10th, 2010 at 1:00PM.

  1. A Decision Review Officer hearing has been requested regarding my request for an Earlier Effective Date for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, currently evaluated as 60-percent disabling.



    A copy of the original VA Form 21-4138 Statement In Support Of Claim, received by the Philadelphia Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office and dated March 9th, 1993 are a matter of record. The symptoms described are consistent with those of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

The subsequent denial of service-connection issued by thePhiladelphia VARO dated August 13th, 1993, and ongoingapplications for service-connection for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome arealso a matter of record.

  1. A VA Form 21-4138 was submitted in response to a Training Letter issued by Eric Shinseki, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs dated February 4th, 2010. This Training Letter stated, in part, the following;



    “VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said the decision is part of a "fresh, bold look" his department is taking to help veterans who have what's commonly called "Gulf War illness" and have long felt the government did little to help them. The VA says it also plans to improve training for medical staff who work with Gulf War vets, to make sure they do not simply tell vets that their symptoms are imaginary - as has happened to many over the years.”



    The above training letter, and statements made by Secretary Eric Shinseki on the matter, confirm beyond any doubt that a problem exists regarding Gulf War related issues. The Department of Veterans Affairs is taking steps to rectify these problems, to include a review of previously denied claims for compensation.



    Therefore it is requested that my claim for service-connection for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome be reopened in accordance with Training Letter 10-01 titled Adjudicating Claims Based on Service in the Gulf War and Southwest Asia. Special note should be given to the fact that this is a request to reopen an existing claim, and not to be considered a new claim.



    There are two primary issues that must be given consideration during this request to reopen an existing claim.



    First, it should be noted that the original request for service-connection for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is dated March 9th, 1993. The subsequent Rating Decision and denial from the Philadelphia VARO was dated August 13, 1993.



    However, the condition of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was not added to the Schedule of Ratings until November 29th, 1994 as §4.88a under Infectious Diseases, Immune Disorders and Nutritional Deficiencies.



    Second, a Rating Decision denying an Earlier Effective Date for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was issued by the Roanoke VARO on May 20th, 2010. The Reasons For Decisions included the following statement; “You were not shown to have a diagnosed disability while you were on active duty, symptoms of fatigue were denied prior to your release from active duty, and there was no medical evidence showing the clinical diagnosis of a disability at the time that you first filed your claim for chronic fatigue.”



    However, in a previous Rating Decision issued by the Philadelphia VARO dated March 19th, 2004 on the matter of service-connection for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome the following statement is found; “Service connection may be granted for specific diseases which are presumed to have been caused by service if manifested to a compensable degree following military discharge. Although not shown in service, service connection for chronic fatigue syndrome has been granted on the basis of presumption.”



    Initial Chronic Fatigue Syndrome symptoms were consistent with a 20 percent rating from March 9th, 1993 to May 23rd, 1999, and 40 percent from May 23rd, 1999 to January 26th, 2001.



    On May 23rd of 1999 a military medical evaluation found the veteran unfit for duty due to “failure to meet medical requirements”, thus forcing an end to any further military service. Evidence of this fact is the Form 268 and is a matter of record.



    The forced termination of military service due to a failure to meet medical requirements should be considered the equivalent of an absolute minimum rating of 30 percent, as defined in Army Regulation 635-40 Personnel Separations, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation, Section 7-11. See extract below.



    (1) Permanent retirement. If the Soldier meets the criteria below, the Soldier will be removed from the TDRL, permanently retired for physical disability, and entitled to receive disability retired pay:

    (a) The Soldier is unfit.

    (b) The disability causing the Soldier’s name to be placed on the TDRL has become permanent.

    © The disability is rated at 30 percent or more under the VASRD, or the Soldier has at least 20 years of active Federal service.

    In closing, and in addition to all of the above issues, consideration must be given to Benefit of the Doubt as defined in 38 U.S.C. § 5107, and Reasonable Doubt as defined in 38 C.F.R. § 3.102. All statements are true to the best of my knowledge.



    Please render a decision as soon as possible.

Glenn XXXXXX

7557 XXXXXXXX

Roanoke, Virginia

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

(540)204-XXXX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

This is Very well written.

Here is the training letter you refer to:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nfmar10/nf030310-8.htm

and the second link.....

http://www.vawatchdog.org/10/nf10/nffeb10/nf022610-6.htm

In part:

WASHINGTON — The Veterans Affairs Department will re-examine the disability claims of what could be thousands of Gulf War veterans suffering from ailments they blame on their war service, the first step toward compensating them nearly two decades after the war ended.

I need to think about what you posted here and get back here tomorrow.

The nine new GWV presumptives are covered in the Gulf War vet forum and we did a SVR show on them.

This is different-

their denials were obviously wrong.

I am not sure they can grant an EED prior to the publication date of the regs-(the April 1993 denial) but it is worth trying to get a better EED here due to the new training letters.

"On May 23rd of 1999 a military medical evaluation found the veteran unfit for duty due to “failure to meet medical requirements”, thus forcing an end to any further military service. Evidence of this fact is the Form 268 and is a matter of record.

The forced termination of military service due to a failure to meet medical requirements should be considered the equivalent of an absolute minimum rating of 30 percent, as defined in Army Regulation 635-40 Personnel Separations, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation, Section 7-11. See extract below."

You made excellent points here.

I assume and have no evidence to the contrary (and sure feel neither does the VA have)that you were MEBed out due to Chronic Fatique Syndrome.That would be Direct SC of the CFS.

Is this correct as-did you deny fatique in service?

"You were not shown to have a diagnosed disability while you were on active duty, symptoms of fatigue were denied prior to your release from active duty, and there was no medical evidence showing the clinical diagnosis of a disability at the time that you first filed your claim for chronic fatigue.”

Did they actually review your SMRs?How could they misconstrue the MEB stuff?

Then again there was no CFS in the rating schedule at that time.

Excellent the way you laid this all out for them-concise and without any extemporaneous stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad


Would Nehmer apply or is that only for AO claims? A claim was filed for a condition the VA did not recognize so it was denied. Years later it did recognize it and the vet was compensated. This seem similar to a vet getting denied for anxiety and depression a few years after combat in Vietnam. He is denied since PTSD does not exist. A few years later he is SC'ed for anxiety and depression. Years later he makes a claim for PTSD. The symptoms of his anxiety and depression are consistent with PTSD. Shouldn't he have been SC'ed for PTSD back to the time he filed for his anxiety claim. In fact shouldn't he be compensated from the date he was DX'ed with symptoms consistent with PTSD?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I concur with Berta, a very well written and presented case.

And, with John, a certainly entertaining, or maybe I should say, intriguing (sp?) concept, and worth the effort to follow this. Another Nehmer? Heck, why not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments Berta. Going over your questions.

I have printouts of stuff, like Shinseki and his training letters and press statements, they will be submitted.

Since the new regulations are not specific, I think it would be best to initiate a preemptive strike to force the issue. Better to ask forgiveness than to ask permission. Who knows, we may set a precedent with this later on

At the time of my 8-year physical, I was in the national guard. I failed the physical, thus I was not allowed to reenlist another 8 years. At the time I had no idea what an MEB was. I still have no idea if one can MEB out of the reserve component. Once the current issues are resolved, I plan to file for a retroactive retirement from DoD, but that is at least a year down the road.

Two of the stronger issues are 1) the Philly VARO granted me service-connection for CFS on the grounds of "presumption", and stated no medical evidence from active duty was needed. The Roanoke VARO did the exact OPPOSITE and DENIED my EED (even with the original 4138 as a matter of record) due to lack of active duty treatment records, and the ignored the issue of presumption. As for 2) its a no-brainer, the condition did not officially exist in 38 CFR yet. Both conditions scream Benefit Of The Doubt and Reasonable Doubt. Even if the Roanoke VARO denies this, the BVA or CAVC will approve it.

Either way, I will find out of Senator Webbs office is still in my corner on this cut and dry, clear as day decision. If not, no sweat, there is more than one way to skin a cat.

As to john999s question, once I am done with this claim, I will be re-opening my claim for Chronic Prostatitis because I came back from the war with a Line Of Duty Injury Report. Current rating is 40% and I will assert that, upon review of the rating scale, my symptoms were consistent with 40% back in 1991.

Thanks again for all the comments, all!

I will let ya know how it goes tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and, no thanks, I don't want a mint....................however if you have one of those uselss little pillows and a ratty little stinky blanket and if someone would dim the cabin lighting, that would be nice! GEE, but I HATE these overseas flights!

G-d but we had a terrible flight the last time we went to Tel Aviv. An El Al flight (one of the MOST terrorist-free and secure airlines in the world, BTW). But, what did we get, we get the flight that has nothing, NOTHING, but us and 100 Chasidic Rabbis and their Wives and their minimum of 6 kids apiece.

I will SWEAR (and we don't do that, at least very often), I WILL SWEAR there were more people (kids included, oh YEAH, kids included) than there were actual SEATS on the plane. YOU COULDN'T TELL, OF COURSE, BECAUSE THE LITTLE SHAZITS NEVER SAT DOWN. The WHOLE plane was their personal little "jungle gym".

Had one of the kids sitting RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, okay? He spent the total trip, leaning over the back of HIS seat, with his face in mine, waiting for me to close my eyes. SO, he could announce to his BRAIN-DEAD MOTHER, "LOOK MOMMA, THE BIG MAN IS GOING TO SLEEP!"

:blink: , NO, you little shazits I am NOT going to sleep, I am just closing my eyes and picturing, imagining, kidacide!

And, all I could get was a day-old bagel. What............ever!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  


  • Advertisemnt


  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Retroactive Back Pay.
      Retroactive Back Pay - #1Viewed Post Week of March 19. 2018

      My claim is scheduled to close tomorrow for my backpay.
      Does anyone know if it does close how long till the backpay hits the bank?
      Also does information only get updated on our claims whenever the site is down?
      • 44 replies
    • Examining your service medical records...
      * First thing I do after receiving a service medical record is number each page when I get to the end I go back and add 1 of 100 and so on.

      * Second I then make a copy of my service medical records on a different color paper, yellow or buff something easy to read, but it will distinguish it from the original.

      * I then put my original away and work off the copy.

      * Now if you know the specific date it's fairly easy to find. 

      * If on the other hand you don't know specifically or you had symptoms leading up to it. Well this may take some detective work and so Watson the game is afoot.

      * Let's say it's Irritable Syndrome 

      * I would start page by page from page 1, if the first thing I run across an entry that supports my claim for IBS, I number it #1, I Bracket it in Red, and then on a separate piece of paper I start to compile my medical evidence log. So I would write Page 10 #1 and a brief summary of the evidence, do this has you go through all the your medical records and when you are finished you will have an index and easy way to find your evidence. 

      Study your diagnosis symptoms look them up. Check common medications for your IBS and look for the symptoms noted in your evidence that seem to point to IBS, if your doctor prescribes meds for IBS, but doesn't call it that make those a reference also.
      • 9 replies
    • How to get your questions answered on the forum
      Do not post your question in someone else's thread. If you are reading a topic that sounds similar to your question, start a new topic and post your question. When you add your question to a topic someone else started both your questions get lost in the thread. So best to start your own thread so you can follow your question and the other member can follow theirs.

      All VA Claims questions should be posted on our forums. Read the forums without registering, to post you must register it’s free. Register for a free account.

      Tips on posting on the forums.

      Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery” instead of ‘I have a question’.


      Knowledgable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title. I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.


      Use paragraphs instead of one huge, rambling introduction or story. Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.



      Leading to:

      Post clear questions and then give background info on them.



      Examples:

      A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?



      I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine but claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?




      B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?


      I was involved in traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?





      This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial from your claim?” etc.

      Note:

      Your firsts posts on the board may be delayed before they show up, as they are reviewed, this process does not take long and the review requirement will be removed usually by the 6th post, though we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.

      This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before they hit the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims and this helps us do that.
      • 2 replies
    • I have a 30% hearing loss and 10% Tinnitus rating since 5/17.  I have Meniere's Syndrome which was diagnosed by a VA facility in 2010 yet I never thought to include this in my quest for a rating.  Meniere's is very debilitating for me, but I have not made any noise about it because I could lose my license to drive.  I am thinking of applying for additional compensation as I am unable to work at any meaningful employment as I cannot communicate effectively because of my hearing and comprehension difficulties.  I don't know whether to file for a TDUI, or just ask for additional compensation.  My county Veterans service contact who helped me get my current rating has been totally useless on this when I asked her for help.  Does anyone know which forms I should use?  There are so many different directions to proceed on this that I am confused.  Any help would be appreciated.  Vietnam Vet 64-67. 
    • e-Benefits Status Messages
      e-Benefits Status Messages 

      Claims Process – Your claim can go from any step to back a step depending on the specifics of the claim, so you may go from Pending Decision Approval back to Review of Evidence. Ebenefits status is helpful but not definitive. Continue Reading
      • 0 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines