Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

paulcolrain

Senior Chief Petty Officer
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by paulcolrain

  1. OK HI FOLKS. SO JUST AN UPDATE. WELL ITS BEEN 30 DAYS SINCE MY ADVANCEMENT WAS GRANTED AND STILL NOTHING. FRIDAY WAS TOLD THAT IT HASNT GONE TO JUDGE YET . I HAVE SEEN SOME PLACES THAT MY ADVANCEMENT SHOULD GO TO LINE FROM DATE I ASKED AND THAT WAS STAMPED AS OF 02/11/2017... SO I GUESS THEN ITS BEEN ITS BEEN 150 DAYS SINCE.. ANY WHICH WAY ILL KEEP ALL POSTED SO I CAN PROVIDE THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE. 

  2. i totally agree with Berta as well. Congrats on this Award!!! looks as if its more than 10 years retro... also note to yourself,,, now that you have a 70% award you should talk to your husband about getting temporaly Total Disability from VA. i think its TDIU and state that your husband has been in this state since this appeal. 

  3. i too had a strange thing with VA. i was Discharged in 2004. i did apply for Comp but was denied due to no medical records found in my service files. i didnt appeal because i figured they Knew Best and i must Be Wrong,,, i was still in be a great soldier mode..... all of a sudden in november of 2010 someone in the VA found my service records and gave me 10% i was totally stunned. i asked for answers and was told that the army lost my service records and then found them and sent 6 years later... so then i finally realized i needed to get informed about what the heck really goes on . it is sad to know how many Vets have Benefits and dont know because they got told no.

  4. So January I submitted my eviction notice, electric shut off notice, insurance cancellled notice,, EVERYTHING for an advanced Docket,, to my VSO who's office is in the BVA building Washington DC. I was told within a few weeks I'll hear something. Well 100 + days later still no ruling on it & told they have a " Huge backlog of these as well since the new year" .. wouldn't you think though that any appeal with a docket date of 2017 then shouldn't be allowed to be adjudicated until older dockets who's advancement still hasn't been heard yet?

  5. On 2/23/2017 at 9:35 AM, Buck52 said:

    I agree with paulcolrain

    This Dr is full of it.  if he was a VA Dr   then just wants to use his credential as power that he can mess up a veterans claim.

     I be glad when the VA gets Rid of all these kinds of Dr's, I had a VA Dr do this to me and had to go get a private Dr to rebut him and it worked.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.02830.x/full

    I ALSO GOT TO SAY,,,, DIDNT THE BVA COME OUT WITH A FAST LETTER DIRECTING THE RO TO CHANGE THIS? LIKE I REMEMBER AT SOME POINT READING THAT,,, IF THE DOCTOR OR THE C+P CANT PROVE THAT IT DOESNT CAUSE A SECONDARY THAN THE 50% RULE GOES TO VET... IN OTHER WORDS FLIP WHAT Dr. SAID. SO ITS NOT THE CAUSE BECAUSE IT ONLY CAUSES HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE FOR A MOMENT OF PAIN... WELL THEN,,,, ISNT THAT A CAUSATION OF SECONDARY THAT GIVES TO VET? I MIGHT LOOK INTO MY OWN CLAIM NOW.... LOL...

     

  6. THINK OF THIS ONE....

    IF THE BOARD OF VETERANS APPEALS TELLS THE REGIONAL OFFICE THAT THEY MADE A MISTAKE THEN THE APPEALS TEM WITHIN THE REGIONAL OFFICE GETS BUT HURT BECAUSE THERE SUCCESS RATE GOES DOWN AND THEY DONT GET A BONUS! SO LETS PUT IT THE OTHER WAY. DRO INSIDE THE REGIONAL OFFICE IS IN FACT ALLIGNED WITH THE RO SO IF THEY STATE THEY ARE WRONG THEY ARE TAKING BONUSES AWAY FROM THERE OWN PEOPLE THE PROBABLY DRIVE SHARE WITH.

  7. On 3/6/2017 at 4:14 PM, Berta said:

    I am guessing that the VSO has not prepared the 646 yet.

    Here is a blank 646:

    https://www.va.gov/vaforms/va/pdf/VA646.pdf

    In  a letter I sent to the Secretary this was one of many ways I identified as causing the backlog.

    I suggested the 646 be prepared as soon as the I-9 has been prepared-and attached to the I-9, as  that way the same VSO who is familar with the claim can prepare the 646,instead of some VSO probably in a DC office.

    The 646 is an absolute time waster unless the VSO is willing to add additional argument to support the appeal.Most of them can check the first box on the 646 because they dont have a clue on how to prepare a valid argument.Or they do have a clue but dont want to take the time to do it.

    Very few 646s are ever mentioned at all by the BVA in their decisions.

    Because very few 646s actually raise  good points of argument that the claimant might have overlooked in preparing their  I-9.

    This form is a chance for VSOs to actually "represent" the veteran on appeal and one more chance to seek legal errors in the decision being appealed. 

    If most VSOs are not able to push the claim forward with a strong argument, what is the point for them to be expected to file out a 646......there is no point....and they have an endless stack of these forms.

    I am beginning to believe that the entire VSO-vet rep POA idea is a crock.

    Vet reps get paid whether they help with a claim or hinder the claim.

    I dont know if you can contact the VSO who actually has the 646 for your appeal..and I don't know if that would do any good.

    Then again -if this is a delay because of a good VSO presenting a valid argument for the claim....it would probably be well worth the wait.

     

     

     

    I am beginning to believe that the entire VSO-vet rep POA idea is a crock. IVE BEEN TRYING TO START A THREAD ON THIS BUT I KEEP GETTING SHUT SOWN.. IM SO CONFUSED ON HOW THEY WORK FOR US IF THERE MONEY COMES FROM OUR ACTUAL WAITING AND THERE NUMBERS. ANOTHER WORDS,, IF VETS DIDNT WAIT THEN THERE NUMBERS WOULD BE LOW THEN THERE PAY WOULD BE LOW AND THERE INFLUENCE WOULD BE LOW

  8. 14 hours ago, allansc2005 said:

    Buck,

    I'm a true testament of the DRO route.

    They love it when the veteran comes in "locked and loaded" with records, medical records, C&P exams, past decision notices. And law cases that pertain to the case.

    I took your advice and won my cases-CUE and IU on the spot!

     

    Allan

    2-2-0 HUAH!

     

    i believe you im just realy stunned because IVE NEVER HEARD OF A DRO MAKING A DECISION ON THE DAY OF A HEARING ??? COULD BE WRONG BUT NEVER HEAR OF IT!

  9. 8 hours ago, allansc2005 said:

    I requested a review in July 2015, and had my review on 12 January, 2017.

    so i started this because i was trying to show that if you go for a DRO review you miss the Date for a BVA hearing Docet Number. now of course if you get a good response from the DRO review than cool but if not your 2 years behind the 8 ball now as i see it. IM DOING THE MATH AND,,,  if you req in 2015 got in 2017 and still wondering... lets say you didnt do DRO. so in 2015 you would have requested a BVA hearing with all the same evidence. now we are in 2017 so you would be only like 1 year away from an adjudication or remand. now that being said,, if you dont like the dro hearing answer you still have to get i9 certified by BVA as the date you sign it after your DRO hearing so you will have an additional 4 years to wait. all need to remember.. just because you appeal that does NOT MEAN YOUR APPEAL DATE WITH THE BVA IS YOUR DOCKET DATE. YOUR DOCKET DATE IS THE DATE AFTER YOU CERTIFY YOUR I9/ SO YOU COULD APPEAL AT THE RO FOR 10 YEARS BUT WHEN YOU BRING IT TO THE BVA YOU ARE BRAND NEW.

  10. i have similar back issues. DJD and nerve. i did try this as well. i put in for hypertention due to pain and i got a denial. the denial stated from Doctor ( wich i dont believe)  said, all medical dictionaries state that chronic hypertention is not a secondary due to pain its only a brief of high blood pressure. in other words,,, they said that hypertension needs a reason and pain is not the absolute cause. you will need an IMO directing that it is due to pain for you.

  11. On 12/29/2016 at 8:47 PM, broncovet said:

    There can be other reasons.  One example:

    You have a 2013 docket date, and the case is remanded.  Your remand is denied, again.  You appeal the remand and, at least some of the time, you get to "keep" your old docket date and dont have to start over.  

    That is what happened to me.  I had a 2009 remand.  It took the VARO 3 years to implement the remand, in 2012.  It was denied.  I appealed.  IN 2015 it was denied again.  I appealed to the CAVC which remanded it again.  I think I still have the 2009 docket date.  With a 2009 docket date, my case should get worked before 2013 dockets WITHOUT an advance on the docket.  

    This is because a remand "requires expiditious treatment".  For VA "expiditious" means 8 years.  

    Bronco, i understand remands but again when you read the citation you see the entire case. anotherwords,,, if this was a remand than the remand happend after 2014. if the backlog now on the website states january of 2013???? again how did this happen and many like it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use