teejay53

Nevada office working on fixing veterans claim backlog One of the most discussed issues with respect to veterans’ services today is the claims backlog. It is a national issue, and one that has received national coverage, but for the veterans in Nevada it also is a local issue. While the Nevada Office of Veterans Services is not involved in reviewing and rating the claims that are currently in the backlog, we are dedicated to doing whatever we can to assist in addressing this problem for our veterans. Simply put, the backlog consists of the numerous claims made by veterans that are awaiting review and rating by the federal Department of Veterans Affairs. These claims could be delayed for one of many reasons, including the requirement for more medical information on the part of the veteran pursuing the claim, the number of new claims being filed each day, and various other reasons. The Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Reno, which serves as the benefits office for the veterans in Nevada, is facing a backlog of approximately 10,000 claims and is actively addressing the issue. As I mentioned above, the backlog is a national issue, and one that is brought on by many complex reasons, many of which come down to the VA trying to do the right thing for the veterans it serves. First, was the recent decision to create the Agent Orange presumptive for those who served in Vietnam, essentially meaning that veterans from this era with certain conditions will be presumed to have a service-connected disability, and therefore, receive treatment for the condition through the VA health system. Second is that America has been involved in two wars for the last decade, and that more veterans have been seeking assistance from the VA. Finally, the VA has increased its outreach initiatives in recent years, meaning that more veterans are aware of the services that they provide and seeking their assistance in obtaining them. While most would agree that these conditions and others amount to positive efforts, they have created extraordinary demand for VA services over recent years. This demand has been felt acutely around the country, and in Nevada as well. Our office has been working on this, ensuring that our service officers are filing fully developed claims, increasing training for our advocates, and otherwise supporting our federal partners in whatever way we can. On April 18 of this year, most of Nevada’s federal delegation wrote a letter to Allison Hickey, the VA’s Under Secretary for Benefits, offering help in addressing the backlog issue in our state. This letter brought a lot of attention to the challenges that the VA Regional Office in Reno is facing, and started a broader conversation among many about what could be done to assist. The next day, the federal VA said it would expedite claims in the short term and in the long term. First, because of the local backlog, the VA shifted the oldest claims to other locations where they could be rated more quickly. Secretary Eric Shinseki also announced that the federal VA would start providing provisional ratings for the oldest claims in its backlog, meaning that the veteran will receive a rating based on the evidence that has already been provided, and that might increase with a final rating once all of the evidence is provided. Both measures, and others, will result in a reduction of the backlog, and also, getting payments to the veterans who are waiting for them more quickly. I had the opportunity to speak with both the Director of the VA Regional Office and the Under Secretary for Benefits Allison Hickey last week on these issues. While we all acknowledged the difficulty of the task facing them, there also was agreement on the fact that we all had to continue to work as hard as we can to ensure that the needs of Nevada’s veterans are met. In both conversations, I offered our services, whether it was through volunteering, providing feedback, or whatever resources that we could provide. This is an important commitment to make to our veterans, and the Nevada Office of Veterans Services will do everything it can to ensure that this is addressed as quickly as possible. Caleb S. Cage is the executive director of the Nevada Office of Veterans Services, appointed by Gov. Brian Sandoval. You can read his blog at http://veterans.nv.gov/blog. Link to story: http://www.nevadaappeal.com/news/local/6313997-113/veterans-backlog-claims-nevada

Veterans groups worry new VA plan to clear claims backlog is 'all smoke-and-mirrors' bureaucracy A new plan to close old cases at the Department of Veterans Affairs is raising worries the change will just make VA look more efficient instead of helping long-suffering veterans with aging disability claims. The department is under pressure from Congress, veterans groups and others to end its backlog of more than 600,000 unfinished pension and disability benefits claims cases, especially those that have lingered in bureaucratic limbo for years. Under the new plan, VA will issue a "provisional" rating within 60 days on cases two years old or more. Veterans would then have a year to submit new evidence to increase their rating, or ask that the rating be made final so they can file an appeal. The apparent catch is that issuing the provisional rating may lead to creation of a new case, thus letting VA "close" the old one when in fact the veteran's claim remains outstanding. Ronald Robinson, president of the AFGE union local that represents VA claims workers in Columbia, S.C., said the new rules are nothing more than an effort to make the agency's sinking statistics look better. Two critical numbers for VA are the average time a claim has been pending, and the time it takes to issue a rating. Robinson said old cases under the new plan would be considered closed once the provisional rating is issued. If the veteran submits new evidence, that will be considered a new case, said Robinson, who spent 20 years in the Army and another 17 at VA. "These provisional decisions only serve one purpose and that is to cook the VA books and cheat the veteran," he said. "This is smoke and mirror claims- processing." VA officials did not respond to an interview request or a series of written questions seeking clarification on the new initiative. Almost 900,000 disability and pension claims are awaiting an initial rating decision, which determines whether a veteran is entitled to monthly benefits for service-connected illnesses and injuries and, if so, how much. About 70 percent of them have been in the system longer than 125 days, the point at which they are considered "backlogged" by the agency. The Washington Examiner's "Making America's Heroes Wait" investigative series earlier this year detailed VA's repeated failures to reduce the backlog despite massive budget and staff increases since 2009. VA has not released information on how many veterans have claims that are more than two years old. Few details of the new plan have been released since its abrupt announcement by VA Friday. That has left veterans advocates hopeful but skeptical that the initiative will do much to help veterans with old cases. Tom Tarantino, chief policy officer at Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, said it's too early to know whether VA's fast-track initiative is meant to fix the problem or just fix the agency's numbers. Implemented properly, it could help veterans get some benefits they are entitled to, he said. For instance, if a veteran has an aging claim with five medical conditions, and there is sufficient documentation to decide only two of them, the new policy will allow ratings for those two issues. What happens to the other three conditions is still unclear, Tarantino said. If VA makes it a priority to resolve them quickly, then the new initiative could benefit veterans, he said. If the new system merely closes cases based on the two conditions that are fully documented, then leaves it to the veteran to continue fighting for full recognition of the remaining conditions, the new policy will do little to fix the problem, he said. "This could just be a math trick where they are reducing the backlog," Tarantino said. "If they just give someone the claim and then send it all the way back to the beginning of the line, then they are playing numbers games. "If they give someone a provisional rating and then fast track those claims to completion, then that is its proper execution. This in theory could go either way." Peter Gaytan, executive director of the American Legion, worries the new policy will lead to legitimate claims being rejected or disability ratings being lower than they should be. Provisional ratings will be based on evidence VA has at the time. The new policy does nothing to determine why a case has been stuck in the system for two years or more, Gaytan said. If implemented poorly, it could make matters worse by creating a new tier of cases as veterans submit new information to raise their provisional ratings, he said. VA has not done a good job of explaining its new policy, so it's too early to judge the agency's motives or the plan's chances for success, Gaytan said. "It's as confusing to us as it is to anyone else," he said. Mark Flatten is a member of The Washington Examiner Watchdog investigative reporting team. He can be reached at mflatten@washingtonexaminer.com. link to story: http://washingtonexaminer.com/veterans-groups-worry-new-va-plan-to-clear-claims-backlog-is-all-smoke-and-mirrors-bureaucracy/article/2528108

Thought this may be of interest. --------------------------------------- Whistleblower: VA Hiding Veteran Health Data Mar 14, 2013 Military.com| by Bryant Jordan A former epidemiologist for the Department of Veterans’ Affairs told lawmakers on Wednesday that the agency’s Office of Public Health buries or obscures research findings on veterans exposed to environmental toxins and hazards going as far back as the Persian Gulf War. Steven Coughlin, who had worked more than four years for the VA before quitting over “serious ethical concerns” in December, said in testimony that leadership in the agency’s public health office did not want to find or reveal evidence that Gulf War illness and other sicknesses were linked to troops’ military experience. "On the rare occasions when embarrassing study results are released, data are manipulated to make them unintelligible,” he told the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Coughlin said his former office never released findings of a $10 million study that produced data on 60,000 Iraq and Afghan war vets – of which up to 30 percent were Gulf War vets – that revealed exposures to pesticides, oil well fires and more. He said the results of a congressionally mandated study on Gulf War veterans and their family members also was never released, and claims he was advised that “these results have been permanently lost.” “Anything that supports the position that Gulf War illness is a neurological condition is unlikely to ever be published,” he said. One of Couglin’s former supervisors, Dr. Aaron Schneiderman, threatened retaliation against him after he balked at the idea of deliberately leaving out certain relevant data in a research project, Coughlin said. Victoria Davey, chief of the VA’s public health and environmental hazards office, told lawmakers that the office follows strict guidelines in analyzing and publishing its work. However, but she never directly addressed Coughlin’s allegations. In a statement released after the hearing on Wednesday, the VA said VA Secretary Erik Shinseki has ordered the VA’s Office of Research Oversight to review Coughlin’s claims, including the alleged threat. Any retaliation against VA employees is against the law and is not tolerated, the statement said. “The Department of Veterans Affairs has a decade’s long history of conducting world-class research studies that meet accepted and rigorous scientific standards,” the statement read. “All allegations of malfeasance are taken seriously and are investigated fully. Coughlin said Schneiderman told him not to look at data regarding hospitalizations and doctors’ visits while he was working on research into the health effects of burn pits on troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have reported serious respiratory problems that they believe are connected to inhaling smoke from the massive trash burn pits found in combat zones. Coughlin told the House panel that when he said he did not want to continue in the project under those conditions, Schneiderman threatened him. As with Vietnam veterans before them, large numbers of Gulf War veterans became ill in the years following the 1991 war. Those Gulf War veterans were told their problems were psychological. The VA has said it does recognize there are health issues associated with Gulf War service, and notes that Shinseki formed a task force to conduct a comprehensive review of VA programs to help improve care and services for Gulf War vets. The VA says in 2010 it recognized nine diseases linked to experience in the Gulf War. According to Lea Steele, an epidemiologist with the Institute of Biomedical Studies at Baylor University, the VA still has serious problems in its approach – and funding – of Gulf War research. She told Congress on Wednesday that scientific advances over the past 10 years have provided important insights into Gulf War illness. Steele has been studying Gulf War illness since 1998. “After so many years of waiting, there is finally some hope for Gulf War veterans,” she said. “Hope that they will have answers that are long overdue and hope that treatments will be found that can meaningfully improve their health and their lives.” “What is not acceptable is federal research that is poorly informed, based on notions developed in the early years after the Gulf War rather than on the scientific evidence now available,” she said. VA has reportedly spent $120 million over the past decade on Gulf War illness research, but some of that money never went to Gulf War research, Steele said. In one instance, $10 million was earmarked for something called a “Gulf War Biorepository Trust” that had nothing to do with Gulf War veterans. It was, instead, used to fund a brain bank for veterans who had ALS, or Lou Gehrig’s disease. As of 2010, only one of the 60 brains in the brain bank had come from a Gulf War veteran, Steele said. The others were those of older veterans. Link to article: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/03/14/whistleblower-va-hiding-veteran-health-data.html?comp=7000023435700&rank=5

Thought this may be interest. ---------------------------------------- Veterans Budget Gets $63 Billion Boost From Obama White House Posted: 04/05/2013 4:43 pm EDT | Updated: 04/08/2013 10:54 am EDT WASHINGTON -- Despite growing pressure for budget cuts, the Obama administration next week will propose spending $63.5 billion for veterans services in fiscal 2014, asking for a 4 percent increase over current spending. The money is targeted at eliminating the backlog of veterans claims for benefits and increasing mental health services, including treatment for military sexual trauma. The budget proposal, which will not be officially unveiled until next week, also will make permanent two tax credits to encourage employers to hire veterans. Since 2009, the overall budget, including mandated programs and discretionary spending, has risen from about $100 billion in 2009 to $140 billion this year, an increase of about 40 percent. The VA's discretionary spending this year is roughly $61 billion. The backlog in claims has long bedeviled the VA, which currently is working on 854,000 veterans benefits claims, of which 595,000 are overdue. The VA inspector general earlier this year found a veteran who has been waiting more than four years for his paperwork to be finished. Much of the backlog has been caused by the addition of new benefits for which veterans can file claims, including exposure to Agent Orange defoliant during the Vietnam War, and Gulf War syndrome. But the VA also has been struggling to replace its antiquated paperwork claims process with an automated digital system, which is now installed in 30 of the VA's 56 regional benefits offices. VA Secretary Eric Shinseki told reporters at the White House on Friday that by the end of 2013, the system will be completed. The goal is to eliminate the backlog by 2015, but "the effects of automation are going to begin to show themselves" long before that, he said. At present, even with much of the system bogged down in paper, VA claims adjusters are completing 1 million claims a year, Shinseki said. "We're glad to see the increase in the budget," said Paul Reickhoff, chief executive officer of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. But he was highly skeptical of the VA claims that it is making progress on reducing the backlog of veterans claims for benefits. "The customers on the ground, our members, don't see it," he said. The proposed budget increases for 2014 include nearly $7 billion for mental health services such as treatment for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and providing such service for veterans families. It also includes medical and rehabilitation services for the 50,000 American military personnel wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan. "We've been at war for 10 years and we have far more complex injuries to deal with," said Shinseki, himself a veteran wounded in the Vietnam War. Taking care of these wounded veterans, he said, "is going to go on for years." Shinseki turned aside a question about what the White House Office of Management and Budget, which has approval authority over agency budget requests, had rejected out of his budget proposals."You could always use more money," he said. But he added that President Obama has been a strong advocate for veterans, and his budget requests have increased every year. White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough acknowledged that the battle with Congress over spending and taxes "is forcing a lot of very difficult choices." But he said spending on veterans "is at the top of our list." He did not rule out, however, the possibility that the OMB had pruned back the budget requests from the VA. "It wouldn't surprise me if this was not the first time in the history of the OMB process that there was wrestling over the ultimate number," McDonough said. "But we feel good about the investments we've made in veterans and their families over the course of five years," he continued, singling out the VA's new automated claims processing system. He said of Obama, "There is nobody more impatient than the guy we're reporting to." Link to article http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/veterans-budget-2014_n_3023036.html

Thought this may be of interest. -------------------------------------------- Veterans fight changes to disability payments By Kevin Freking - The Associated Press Posted : Saturday Mar 30, 2013 9:33:16 EDT WASHINGTON — Veterans groups are rallying to fight any proposal to change disability payments as the federal government attempts to address its long-term debt problem. They say they've sacrificed already. Government benefits are adjusted according to inflation, and President Barack Obama has endorsed using a slightly different measure of inflation to calculate Social Security benefits. Benefits would still grow but at a slower rate. Advocates for the nation's 22 million veterans fear that the alternative inflation measure would also apply to disability payments to nearly 4 million veterans as well as pension payments for an additional 500,000 low-income veterans and surviving families. "I think veterans have already paid their fair share to support this nation," said the American Legion's Louis Celli. "They've paid it in lower wages while serving, they've paid it through their wounds and sacrifices on the battlefield and they're paying it now as they try to recover from those wounds." Economists generally agree that projected long-term debt increases stemming largely from the growth in federal health care programs pose a threat to the country's economic competitiveness. Addressing the threat means difficult decisions for lawmakers and pain for many constituents in the decades ahead. But the veterans groups point out that their members bore the burden of a decade of war in Iraq and Afghanistan. In the past month, they've held news conferences on Capitol Hill and raised the issue in meetings with lawmakers and their staffs. They'll be closely watching the unveiling of the president's budget next month to see whether he continues to recommend the change. Obama and others support changing the benefit calculations to a variation of the Consumer Price Index, a measure called "chained CPI." The conventional CPI measures changes in retail prices of a constant marketbasket of goods and services. Chained CPI considers changes in the quantity of goods purchased as well as the prices of those goods. If the price of steak goes up, for example, many consumers will buy more chicken, a cheaper alternative to steak, rather than buying less steak or going without meat. Supporters argue that chained CPI is a truer indication of inflation because it measures changes in consumer behavior. It also tends to be less than the conventional CPI, which would impact how cost-of-living raises are computed. Under the current inflation update, monthly disability and pension payments increased 1.7 percent this year. Under chained CPI, those payments would have increased 1.4 percent. The Congressional Budget Office projects that moving to chained CPI would trim the deficit by nearly $340 billion over the next decade. About two-thirds of the deficit closing would come from less spending and the other third would come from additional revenue because of adjustments that tax brackets would undergo. Isabel Sawhill, a senior fellow in economic studies at The Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank, said she understands why veterans, senior citizens and others have come out against the change, but she believes it's necessary. "We are in an era where benefits are going to be reduced and revenues are going to rise. There's just no way around that. We're on an unsustainable fiscal course," Sawhill said. "Dealing with it is going to be painful, and the American public has not yet accepted that. As long as every group keeps saying, 'I need a carve-out, I need an exception,' this is not going to work." Sawhill argued that making changes now will actually make it easier for veterans in the long run. "The longer we wait to make these changes, the worse the hole we'll be in and the more draconian the cuts will have to be," she said. That's not the way Sen. Bernie Sanders sees it. The chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs said he recently warned Obama that every veterans group he knows of has come out strongly against changing the benefit calculations for disability benefits and pensions by using chained CPI. "I don't believe the American people want to see our budget balanced on the backs of disabled veterans. It's especially absurd for the White House, which has been quite generous in terms of funding for the VA," said Sanders, I-Vt. "Why they now want to do this, I just don't understand." Sanders succeeded in getting the Senate to approve an amendment last week against changing how the cost-of-living increases are calculated, but the vote was largely symbolic. Lawmakers would still have a decision to make if moving to chained CPI were to be included as part of a bargain on taxes and spending. Sanders' counterpart on the House side, Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., the chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, appears at least open to the idea of going to chained CPI. "My first priority is ensuring that America's more than 20 million veterans receive the care and benefits they have earned, but with a national debt fast approaching $17 trillion, Washington's fiscal irresponsibility may threaten the very provision of veterans' benefits," Miller said. "Achieving a balanced budget and reducing our national debt will help us keep the promises America has made to those who have worn the uniform, and I am committed to working with Democrats and Republicans to do just that." Marshall Archer, 30, a former Marine Corps corporal who served two stints in Iraq, has a unique perspective about the impact of slowing the growth of veterans' benefits. He collects disability payments to compensate him for damaged knees and shoulders as well as post-traumatic stress disorder. He also works as a veterans' liaison for the city of Portland, Maine, helping some 200 low-income veterans find housing. Archer notes that on a personal level, the reduction in future disability payments would also be accompanied down the road by a smaller Social Security check when he retires. That means he would take a double hit to his income. "We all volunteered to serve, so we all volunteered to sacrifice," he said. "I don't believe that you should ever ask those who have already volunteered to sacrifice to then sacrifice again." That said, Archer indicated he would be willing to "chip in" if he believes that everyone is required to give as well. He said he's more worried about the veterans he's trying to help find a place to sleep. About a third of his clients rely on VA pension payments averaging just over $1,000 a month. He said their VA pension allows them to pay rent, heat their home and buy groceries, but that's about it. "This policy, if it ever went into effect, would actually place those already in poverty in even more poverty," Archer said. The changes that would occur by using the slower inflation calculation seem modest at first. For a veteran with no dependents who has a 60 percent disability rating, the use of chained CPI this year would have lowered the veteran's monthly payments by $3 a month. Instead of getting $1,026 a month, the veteran would have received $1,023. Raymond Kelly, legislative director for Veterans of Foreign Wars, acknowledged that veterans would see little change in their income during the first few years of the change. But even a $36 hit over the course of a year is "huge" for many of the disabled veterans living on the edge, he said. The amount lost over time becomes more substantial as the years go by. Sanders said that a veteran with a 100 percent disability rating who begins getting payments at age 30 would see their annual payments trimmed by more than $2,300 a year when they turn 55. Link to article: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2013/03/ap-veterans-fight-disability-payments-changes-033013/

link at bottom of article does not work, however the hotlink "word" in article do take you to letter.

Thought this may be of interest, link to this article is: http://www.veterans.senate.gov/press-releases.cfm?action=release.display&release_id=dc34bbf2-2953-4b8a-9c63-62c652e4d033 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs Press Release Senators Call for Greater Pentagon, VA Cooperation on Claims Backlog WASHINGTON, March 25 – The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs today urged Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to help the Department of Veterans Affairs curb a growing backlog of claims for disability benefits. The letter from Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the chairman and the ranking member of the Senate panel, spoke of “the absolute need for continued collaboration, cooperation and commitment between these two agencies.” All of the other members of the committee also signed the letter, including Sens. John D. Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Mark Begich (D-Alaska), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), John Boozman (R-Ark.) and Dean Heller (R-Nev.). Veterans receive disability compensation for injuries or illness incurred during their active military service. As of this month, more than 600,000 claims have been pending for more than 125 days and are considered backlogged. The senators said the Pentagon has an “increasingly vital” role to play in VA’s effort to transform the compensation claims process. They called the backlog “one of the largest challenges confronting the Department of Veterans Affairs.” They praised a recent agreement to speed the delivery of Department of Defense documents to the VA on the treatment of service-related injuries. They also encouraged a planned switch from paper to digital records by the end of this year. “We look forward to working together to ensure that the brave men and women who have put their lives on the line to defend our country receive the benefits that they undoubtedly earned and deserve,” the letter said. To read the letter, click link below: http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/3_25_13%20%20Letter%20to%20Sec.%20Hagel.pdf

Thought this may be of interest. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bill: Help more blind, disabled vets get to VA By Patricia Kime - Staff writer Posted : Friday Mar 22, 2013 15:56:42 EDT The Veterans Affairs Department should do a better job of helping blind and severely disabled veterans reach their medical appointments, say two House Democrats who have written a bill that would require VA to broaden its rules on paying for transportation for veterans. Rep. Julia Brownley, D-Calif., and Rep. Mike Michaud, D-Maine, introduced a bill Wednesday that would extend travel benefits to veterans with severe vision impairment or mobility problems related to spine injuries or multiple amputations, even if those conditions are not service-connected, if the veterans are receiving in-patient or specialty care under certain VA programs. VA covers transportation costs for veterans who need medical care for service-connected injuries. The proposed legislation, the Veterans Medical Access Act, H.R. 1284, would expand this benefit to those cared for under the VA’s special disabilities rehabilitation programs. “Too often, blind and catastrophically disabled veterans choose not to travel to VA medical centers for care because they can’t afford the costs associated with the travel,” Brownley said. “That is unacceptable,” The bill also would require VA to provide a full report on its beneficiary travel program, including costs and number of veterans helped. The task of getting veterans who can’t drive themselves to medical appointments often is left to national, state and local volunteer organizations. VA itself runs a volunteer transportation network effort, as does Disabled American Veterans. Other groups that provide transit in many communities are the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program, a nationwide initiative of volunteers over age 55, and the American Red Cross. Still, some veterans have problems getting to their appointments, lawmakers said. “No veteran should be deterred from seeking needed medical care at a VA facility due to travel constraints,” said Michaud, ranking Democrat on the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee. “Providing ready access to health care is a critical part of living up to our nation’s shared commitment to all who’ve served.” The bill does not include a cost estimate; if approved, the benefit would be paid for by VA appropriations. http://www.armytimes.com/news/2013/03/military-va-blind-vet-transportation-032213/

Thought this would be of interest to all. ------------------------------------------------------ Senate Opposes Cuts to Social Security – Veterans Benefits Friday, March 22nd, 2013 | Posted by Veterans Today WASHINGTON, March 22 – The Senate tonight voted to block cuts in benefits for Social Security and disabled veterans. The amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) put the Senate on record against changing how cost-of-living increases are calculated in a way that would result in significant cuts. “The time has come for the Senate to send a very loud and clear message to the American people: We will not balance the budget on the backs of disabled veterans who have lost their arms, their legs and their eyesight defending our country. We will not balance the budget on the backs of the men and women who have already sacrificed for us in Iraq and Afghanistan, nor on the widows who have lost their husbands in Iraq and Afghanistan defending our country,” Sanders said. The amendment opposed switching from the current method of measuring inflation to a so-called chained consumer price index. President Barack Obama favors a chained CPI as part of what the White House calls a “grand bargain” that Obama hopes to reach with congressional Republicans. The proposed change would affect more than 3.2 million disabled veterans receiving disability compensation benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would have their benefits reduced by $1,425 at age 45, $2,341 at age 55 and $3,231 at age 65. Benefits for more than 350,000 surviving spouses and children who have lost a loved one in battle also would be cut. Dependency Indemnity Compensation benefits already average less than $17,000 a year. More than 55 million retirees, widows, orphans and disabled Americans receiving Social Security also would be affected by the switch to a chained CPI. That figure includes 9 million veterans with an average yearly benefit of about $15,500. A veteran with average earnings retiring at age 65 would get nearly a $600 benefit cut at age 75 and a $1,000 cut at age 85. By age 95, when Social Security benefits are probably needed the most, that veteran would face a cut of $1,400 – a reduction of 9.2 percent. A chained CPI would cut Social Security benefits for average senior citizens who are 65 by more than $650 a year by the time they are 75 years old, and by more than $1,000 once they reach 85. Groups supporting Sanders include AARP, the AFL-CIO, National Organization for Women, the American Legion, Veterans of Foreign Wars, Disabled American Veterans, AMVETS and others. Sanders is chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the founder of the Defending Social Security Caucus. Contact: Michael Briggs (202) 224-5141 Link to this story: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/22/senate-opposes-cuts-to-social-security-veterans-benefits/

Thought this article may be of interest. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link to article: http://www.stripes.com/news/congressman-calls-on-top-va-official-to-resign-over-benefits-backlog-1.212589?=&utm_source=Stars+and+Stripes+Emails&utm_campaign=Daily+Headlines&utm_medium=email --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Congressman calls on top VA official to resign over benefits backlog By Leo Shane III Stars and Stripes Published: March 20, 2013 WASHINGTON — Lawmakers frustrated over worsening waits by veterans for overdue benefits claims have begun targeting Veterans Affairs workers and leaders, saying someone needs to be held accountable. On Wednesday, House Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Fla., called for the department’s top benefits administrator, Undersecretary Allison Hickey, to step down over the lack of the improvement in the claims backlog. Last week, the top Republican on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee threatened to cut off funding to the department’s headquarters staff unless improvements are made. Lawmakers from both committees questioned whether any underperforming employees have been reprimanded or fired for the continued failure of the system. “There are many people losing patience as we continue to hear the same excuses from VA about increased workload and increased complexity of claims,” Miller said at a hearing Wednesday. “Without better workload or surge capacity planning, I fear that VA is simply one national mission away from complete collapse and utter failure.” Nearly 900,000 veterans compensation and disability claims are currently pending with the department, and about 630,000 of those have been in the system for more than four months. That backlog has steadily worsened over the last few years, despite VA promises last summer that the numbers would improve by now and the department’s stated goal of erasing the overdue claims in 2015. The department processed more than 1 million veterans claims each of the last three years, but still saw the number of overdue files increase. Hickey, who did not directly respond to Miller’s calls for her resignation, told both committees that the department has turned a corner on the backlog, and expects to see progress over the next two years. She credited new processing technology and techniques, better electronic records sharing, and increased training and staffing to handle the problem. “We have achieved momentum with our transformation plan that will improve how veterans’ benefits are delivered for generations to come, and 2013 is the year of full deployment and change,” she told lawmakers. But lawmakers and veterans groups questioned that. Officials from the VFW — who defended Hickey and dismissed calls for her resignation — said they doubt 2015 is a realistic time line to eliminate the backlog. Leaders from Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America called for a presidential commission on the issue, an idea several members of Congress have backed. VA officials said they have worked closely with veterans service organizations to plot out fixes. New rules which allow those groups to submit “fully developed” claims on behalf of veterans are designed to help dramatically reduce the wait times and simplify the process. Still, even supporters of the department’s changes expressed frustration over the pace of progress. Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., said he supports the VA’s current path but “we’ve got to get it done already. Sometime in the next few months, we need to break this thing.” Hickey said she understood the skepticism, but said she is confident that the department can reach that 2015 goal. shane.leo@stripes.com Twitter: @LeoShane

Thought this may be of interest. ------------------------------------------------------------ Cutting the red tape for veterans and survivors Posted: Jan 22, 2013 12:44 PM CST Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:44 PM EST Updated: Feb 21, 2013 12:44 PM CST Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:44 PM EST By WBTV Web Staff UNION COUNTY, NC (WBTV) The Department of Veterans Affairs announced Tuesday it is cutting red tape for veterans by eliminating the need for them to complete an annual Eligibility Verification Report (EVR). VA will implement a new process for confirming eligibility for benefits, and staff that had been responsible for processing the old form will instead focus on eliminating the compensation claims backlog. Historically, beneficiaries have been required to complete an EVR each year to ensure their pension benefits continued. Under the new initiative, VA will work with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) to verify continued eligibility for pension benefits. "By working together, we have cut red tape for veterans and will help ensure these brave men and women get the benefits they have earned and deserve," said Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki. VA estimates it would have sent nearly 150,000 EVRs to beneficiaries in January 2013. Eliminating these annual reports reduces the burden on veterans, their families, and survivors because they will not have to return these routine reports to VA each year in order to avoid suspension of benefits. It also allows VA to redirect more than 100 employees that usually process EVRs to work on eliminating the claims backlog. "Having already instituted an expedited process that enables wounded warriors to quickly access Social Security disability benefits, we are proud to work with our federal partners on an automated process that will make it much easier for qualified veterans to maintain their VA benefits from year to year," said Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. "The IRS is taking new steps to provide critical data to help speed the benefits process for the nation's veterans and Veterans Affairs," said Beth Tucker, IRS Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support. "The IRS is pleased to be part of a partnership with VA and SSA that will provide needed data quickly and effectively to move this effort forward." All beneficiaries currently receiving VA pension benefits will receive a letter from VA explaining these changes and providing instructions on how to continue to submit their unreimbursed medical expenses. More information about VA pension benefits is available at http://www.benefits.va.gov/pension and other VA benefit programs on the joint Department of Defense—VA web portal eBenefits at www.ebenefits.va.gov. Veterans are encouraged to still file their medical expenses even though no paper notification will be received by the VA. http://www.wbtv.com/story/20649717/cutting-the-red-tape-for-veterans

you are welcome.

Thought this may be of interest. ------------------------------------------ Vets don't have to worry about sequestration cuts at VA March 6, 2013 | 5:26 pm | Modified: March 6, 2013 at 5:30 pm Those who rely on the Department of Veterans Affairs for medical care, disability benefits or educational assistance will be spared whatever pain eventually comes from sequestration because the agency is exempt from the automatic budget reductions, the chairman of the House veterans committee said today. Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., said he has pressed VA officials for a year to get a straight answer whether President Obama would claim veterans would be hurt by the sequestration that began this month. Miller finally got a clear concession that the VA's budget is totally exempt from the automatic cuts last December, so any claims now that veterans programs will be harmed are pure hype, he told The Washington Examiner today. "The one thing I wanted to make sure of was that veterans weren't used as political pawns in the discourse," Miller said. "We clearly said VA was exempt. For a year I could not get the White House nor the VA to say 'yes, in fact that's the way we interpret the law.'" The ambiguity is rooted in two conflicting laws. One passed in 1985 allowed a 2 percent cut to veterans' health care in a sequestration while the other, passed in 2010, exempted the VA from any cuts. In November 2011, Miller could not get a clear answer from W. Todd Grams, VA's chief financial officer. White House lawyers were researching the issue, he said. That triggered a series of letters from Miller to the VA and the White House Office of Management and Budget. OMB responded in June 2012 that all programs administered by VA were exempt from sequestration, but the agency could face cuts in undefined "administrative expenses." VA Secretary Eric Shinseki repeated that assertion in congressional testimony last July. "VA is exempt from sequestration except for administrative costs," Shinseki said. "I don't have a definition of administrative costs right now." Miller finally got the answer he wanted in December, when Shinseki sent a letter affirming the entire VA budget, including administrative expenses, are exempt from automatic cuts. Miller said he is concerned the White House chose to "slow roll" the answer because threats to popular veterans programs would give President Obama leverage in budget negotiations. VA officials could not be reached today for comment. While the VA is completely exempt from sequestration, veterans could see some disruptions. For instance, veterans filing disability claims must get their military and medical records from the Department of Defense, which is facing automatic reductions. Pentagon officials blamed the looming sequestration for a decision not to link electronic health records with the VA during a house veterans committee hearing last month. Miller said agencies can minimize those disruptions by making veterans a priority. "I don't think veterans' funding should ever be allowed to be used as political leverage," Miller said. Mark Flatten is a member of The Washington Examiner's Watchdog investigative reporting team. He can be reached at mflatten@washingtonexaminer.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link to article: http://washingtonexaminer.com/vets-dont-have-to-worry-about-sequestration-cuts-at-va/article/2523507

Thought this may be of interest. I called Tricare to inquire about the letter I received regarding this and was told it was an economic decision?? Well Its too far for me to travel so "Tricare Standard" it is for me. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Link to this article: http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2013/02/update-on-the-planned-tricare-prime-rollback/ -------------------------------------------------------- Latest on Planned TRICARE Prime Rollback The TRICARE Management Activity has a new online tool for retirees under age 65 and surviving spouses to verify if their Prime network will end Oct. 1, forcing them to use TRICARE Standard. With the new fiscal year, managed care networks operating beyond 40 miles of military treatment facilities or base closure sites will be halted under next-generation TRICARE support contracts. The change, to impact 171,000 beneficiaries, is intended to cut TRICARE costs for taxpayers. Read more: http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2013/02/update-on-the-planned-tricare-prime-rollback/#ixzz2Mqwrydvc MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com At the TRICARE Prime Service Area website, TRICARE users can type in their zip code and learn whether their Prime service area will exist after Sept. 30. They also can find contact information for contractors and can sign up for email alerts on additional changes planned to Prime service areas. [Editor's Note: Thanks to one of our readers, the following excerpt from a recent DoD article may help some of the possibly affected retirees: "The new contracts limit Prime networks to regions within a 40-mile radius of military treatment facilities and in areas affected by the 2005 base closure and realignment process, she explained. But provisions will allow Prime beneficiaries who see providers outside the 40-mile service area to remain in Prime if they reside within 100 miles of an available primary care manager [Military Treatment Facility] and sign an access waiver, she added.” Read the full DoD article at http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?ID=118969 This Primer Access Waiver is for those who live within 100 miles of a Military Treatment Facility – i.e. military base. Read more: http://militaryadvantage.military.com/2013/02/update-on-the-planned-tricare-prime-rollback/#ixzz2Mqx26mFy MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com

Thought this may be of interest. --------------------------------------------- Thursday, February 28th, 2013 Sanders Questions Vets Service Organizations on Cuts in Disability Benefits WASHINGTON, Feb. 28 – As a Friday deadline neared in Congress’s latest budget showdown, Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today questioned veterans group leaders about a proposal that would cut the benefits of more than 3.2 million disabled veterans and more than 55 million Social Security recipients. Sanders has led opposition in Congress to reducing benefits by adopting a so-called chained CPI changing how the consumer price index is calculated. “It would mean very significant cuts for Social Security beneficiaries as well as for disabled veterans,” Sanders said at a joint hearing of the Senate and House veterans’ affairs committees. Sanders asked representatives of veteran service organizations for their assessment of the proposal. Tom Tarantino, the policy chief for the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, called it “a terrible idea.” He added, “It astounds me that we keep asking veterans to sacrifice more and more.” H. Gene Overstreet, president of the Non-Commissioned Officers Association, called it “a bad idea” and said “veterans have paid their due.” “Unconscionable,” was how Charles Susino, the World War II veteran and national commander of the American Ex-Prisoners of War, characterized the proposal. The proposed change in how the consumer price index is calculated would result in significantly lower annual cost-of-living adjustments for more than 3.2 million disabled veterans receiving disability compensation benefits from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs. Veterans who started receiving VA disability benefits at age 30 would have their benefits reduced by $1,425 at age 45, $2,341 at age 55 and $3,231 at age 65, according to the Congressional Budget Office. More than 55 million retirees, widows, orphans and disabled Americans on Social Security also would be affected by the switch to a so-called chained CPI. The proposal has been advanced by House Republicans and embraced by some Democrats. The White House has said that President Barack Obama would consider the chained CPI as a way to cut benefits by billions of dollars. Link to article. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/28/sanders-questions-vets-service-organizations-cuts-in-disability-benefits/

your welcome, ms. berta

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/benefit-rules-eased-for-veterans-with-brain-injuries.html?ref=veterans&_r=0

Thought this would be of interest. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Link to this. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/benefit-rules-eased-for-veterans-with-brain injuries.html?ref=veterans&_r=0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Rules Eased for Veterans’ Brain Injury Benefits By JAMES DAO Published: December 7, 2012 The Department of Veterans Affairs will propose new regulations on Friday that will make it easier for thousands of veterans to receive health care and compensation for certain illnesses that have been linked to traumatic brain injury. The regulations, which will be published on Monday in the Federal Register, lists Parkinsonism, unprovoked seizures, certain dementias, depression and hormone deficiency diseases related to the hypothalamus, pituitary or adrenal glands as eligible for the expanded benefits. The proposal, which must undergo a 60-day public comment period, could open the door to tens of thousands of veterans filing claims with the Veterans Benefits Administration, which is already struggling to process a huge inventory of such claims. Since 2000, more than 250,000 service members — some still on active duty — have received diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, or T.B.I., according to the Defense Department. Though T.B.I. is commonly viewed as resulting from blast exposure, the vast majority of those injuries were diagnosed in nondeployed troops who were involved in vehicle crashes, training accidents or sports injuries. The Department of Veterans Affairs says that a much smaller number of veterans — about 51,000 — are currently receiving benefits for service-connected traumatic brain injuries. However the department acknowledges that thousands more troops with T.B.I. may be eligible for the expanded benefits. Veterans of prior wars will also be eligible for the benefits, if they can demonstrate that a traumatic brain injury was connected to their military service. Under current rules, a veteran with one of the five illnesses has to provide medical evidence that the disease is the result of military service in order to receive veterans’ benefits. The new rule would potentially speed up and simplify their cases, provided a veteran could first demonstrate a service-connected traumatic brain injury. Once that is established, the department will accept without further evidence that any of those five diseases was caused by the T.B.I., making the veteran eligible for additional compensation and health care for that particular disease. The regulations include some significant restrictions on eligibility, however. Veterans with Parkinsonism — a neurological syndrome often resulting in tremors or muscle rigidity — as well as unprovoked seizures, dementias and hormone deficiency diseases will be eligible only if their traumatic brain injury was moderate or severe. The vast majority of such injuries, about 8 in 10, are classified as mild, with most of the rest moderate and a small number severe. The Institute of Medicine, an independent research unit of the National Academy of Sciences, defines a mild traumatic brain injury as involving a loss of consciousness or memory lasting less than 30 minutes. Severe T.B.I. entails loss of consciousness or memory lasting more than 24 hours. The Department of Veterans Affairs said in a news release that it based its policy on a 2008 Institute of Medicine study, which concluded that evidence linking mild T.B.I.’s to the diseases was only “limited or suggestive.” “We must always decide veterans’ disability claims based on the best science available,” the secretary of veterans affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, said in the release. “Veterans who endure health problems deserve timely decisions based on solid evidence that ensure they receive benefits earned through their service to the country.” The proposed regulations also set time restrictions for some of the illnesses. Dementias must become apparent within 15 years of a moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Hormone deficiency diseases must manifest themselves within one year of a moderate or severe brain injury. And depression must become evident within three years of a moderate or severe brain injury or within one year of a mild one. The limits in the coverage are likely to draw criticism from veterans’ groups. Still, the announcement clearly pleased advocates who had spent years pushing for expanded benefits for T.B.I. “Veterans should be pleased with the new regulations,” said Paul Sullivan, a leading advocate for the proposed regulations. But Mr. Sullivan, who is director of public relations for a law firm, Bergmann & Moore, that handles veterans’ claims, said the department must increase training and staffing to ensure that it can handle the wave of new claims likely to result from the new policy. The last time the department significantly expanded benefits — in 2010, for several diseases linked to Agent Orange, the defoliant used in Vietnam — it prompted a tidal wave of new claims, significantly adding to the department’s backlog. Though the department has cleared most of those Agent Orange claims, it still has an inventory of nearly 900,000 pending claims. Department officials said they had no plans to hire extra personnel to handle the new regulations, noting that they did not anticipate that the number of additional claims would be very large.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/baltimore-va-office-gets-help-with-backlog/2013/02/19/b6a2bec4-7add-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html?wprss=rss_national

Thought this article might be of interest. Link to this story http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/baltimore-va-office-gets-help-with-backlog/2013/02/19/b6a2bec4-7add11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html?wprss=rss_national ------------------------------------------------------------ Baltimore VA office gets help with backlog By SteveVogel, Feb 20, 2013 12:15 AM EST BALTIMORE — Teams of claims handlers and new technology are being deployed to help the troubled Baltimore Veterans Affairs office, where veterans face some of the longest waits in the country to have their cases handled, VA Secretary Eric K. Shinseki said Tuesday. “Many veterans, including those living in Maryland, have to wait too long for benefits, and that’s never acceptable,” Shinseki said during an appearance at the Baltimore office with Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.). Two 17-member teams of employees from other regional offices — termed “SWAT teams” by Mikulski — will work in Baltimore in February and March to reduce the backlog, which stood at 19,935 on Feb. 9. A third team already sent to Baltimore doubled the monthly output of processed claims in January, officials said. “We’re bringing in more people from other regional offices to dig in and clear out the backlog,” Mikulski said. In addition, 35 employees at the Baltimore office who had been assigned to other duties are now working solely on the Maryland cases, 84 percent of which have been pending for more than 125 days. Two supervisors from the VA’s office in St. Paul, Minn., one of the best-performing VA offices, arrived Tuesday in Baltimore and will spend 60 days assessing the office’s performance and training workers. The VA also is speeding up the introduction of a paperless claim system to Baltimore, now scheduled to begin in May rather than November. The new Veterans Benefits Management System, which was introduced in the VA office in Hartford, Conn., in September, is now in place in 20 offices and is scheduled to be running nationwide by the end of the year. “Technology is the key,” said Shinseki, who toured the office with Mikulski and met with workers. The Washington Post reported this month that veterans in Maryland often wait more than a year for a decision, and then face a 25 percent chance that their claims will be mishandled, an error rate that is the worst in the nation. Agency figures show the Baltimore regional office’s performance is among the nation’s worst, with claims filed by veterans seeking disability compensation pending 429 days on average — 162 days longer than the national average. “We’ve all read the stories about the backlog — the unacceptably long wait times, lost paperwork and high rates of errors,” Mikulski said. “Nobody thinks this is acceptable. Our veterans have already fought on the front lines. They should not have to fight their own government for benefits they’ve earned and deserve when they return home.” Nationwide, the VA’s 56 regional offices face a backlog of more than 900,000 claims, the result of a sharp increase in filings by veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as well as by older generations, in particular Vietnam veterans who have been able to file many more claims related to the herbicide Agent Orange under liberalized rules. Mikulski noted that much of the time it takes the VA to process claims is spent waiting for information about individual applicants from the Defense Department, Internal Revenue Service and Social Security Administration. The senator said she would convene a roundtable with leaders from the agencies looking for ways to improve communication, coordination, record sharing and to speed up the claims process. “I’m going to crack my budgetary whip,” said Mikulski, who is chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. Baltimore’s problems were exacerbated when it was selected to help pilot a joint VA-Defense Department integrated disability evaluation system, an effort aimed at eliminating red tape that frustrated service members at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and other military hospitals. VA officials acknowledge that the Baltimore office was not given the resources needed for the task. “We did not do it as well as we should have,” said Allison A. Hickey, VA undersecretary for benefits, who appeared with Shinseki and Mikulski. “The system could not handle the big surge. We’ve been trying to fight our way out ever since.” Mikulski said Congress must ensure that the VA is given the resources needed to cut the backlog.

Thought this may be of interest. Link is below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/09/veterans-die-waiting-for-benefits-as-va-claims-backlog-builds.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- A VA internal report shows that the computerized system intended to fix the benefits backlog problem is adding to it. Jamie Reno reports. Despite Secretary Eric Shinseki’s oft-repeated pledge to fix the Department of Veteran Affairs broken disabilities claim system by 2015, the problems have gotten worse, according to a scathing new internal report. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki promised to fix the broken disabilities claim system, but an internal report says things have gotten worse. (Brendan Hoffman) Claims now take an average of 272 days to be processed—an increase of nearly 40 percent from 2011—with some lingering for as long as a year. The error rate now hovers around 14 percent, and the mountainous backlog stands at nearly 900,000, as 53 veterans reportedly die each day waiting for their benefits, according to the Center for Investigative Reporting. The VA's disability claims crisis has only been made worse by the department's high-tech new computerized system intended to streamline the benefits process, according to the strongly worded report (PDF) from the department’s Office of the Inspector General. The $500 million computerized Veterans Benefits Management System (VBMS) has no implementation plan and is riddled with problems, including disorganized electronic claims folders and improper management of hard-copy claims. While VA spokesman Randy Noller tells The Daily Beast that the department still believes that it can live up to Shinseki’s pledge to eliminate the backlog by 2015, reduce the processing time on all claims to 125 days or less, and cut the error rate to 2 percent, the OIG concluded that given the slow and complex nature of this transition from paper to computers, the VA will “continue to face challenges in meeting its goal of eliminating the backlog of disability claims” by 2015—and veterans' advocates dismissed the goal as nearly impossible to meet. In December, the VA touted its “paperless, digital disability claims system” as “a lasting solution that will transform how we operate and eliminate the claims backlog.” But at the four Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) regional offices where the new system was deployed under a pilot program, OIG found it took even longer to process a claim than the VA's old paper system. Despite that failure,18 regional offices have begun the conversion to the new system, and the remaining 38 are expected to make the switch by the end of the year. “VBA should immediately develop and implement a robust plan so that its computer system operates properly and VBA can begin processing claims in an accurate and timely manner,” says Paul Sullivan, a longtime veterans' advocate and director of veteran outreach at Bergmann & Moore, a law firm that focuses solely on veteran disability issues. “Veterans are justifiably frustrated at the deteriorating claims crisis, especially the lack of planning to fix it. Nearly one million veterans now wait nine months for a VBA decision that is wrong as much as 30 percent of the time. How many of our veterans will die waiting for a VBA claim decision that is often wrong?” In a written response to the OIG’s criticisms, the VA said the “excessive” emphasis in the report on the problems with the new electronic claims processing system is “misplaced,” and that while it has taken steps to resolve the issues identified during the rollout of the new system, it expects to “address risks and issues as they are identified.” Meantime, the nationwide disability claims mess continues unabated. At many VA offices it now takes more than a year for veterans to get their claims processed. In Baltimore, the Baltimore Sun recently reported the error rate on claims is 26 percent, more than any other office in the nation. And a recent OIG inspection of VBA’s Regional Office in Detroit also revealed serious problems. The OIG says Detroit staff did not accurately process 31 (52 percent) of the 60 disability claims reviewed. “I hear from veterans all the time who are distraught because they are waiting for a claim to be adjudicated,” says Anthony Hardie, a veterans' advocate and Gulf War veteran who’s testified numerous times before Congress on Gulf War Illness and other issues. “There’s a feeling of hopelessness, a feeling that you are up against an uncaring, unfeeling bureaucracy. It can be overwhelming.” “When I left the military in 1993 there was a claims backlog,” he says. “Twenty years later there is still a claims backlog. It makes my blood boil.” “How many of our veterans will die waiting for a VBA claim decision that is often wrong?” Online Article Has map to view here Veterans advocates say the VA’s ongoing failure to fix what’s broken has had profound repercussions. While awaiting their claims decisions many veterans are losing their homes, unable to pay their bills, and worse. Advocates have also pointed to the claims crisis as one factor that could be contributing to the increase in veteran suicides. There were an average of 22 veteran suicides per day in 2010, according to a newly released VA study. up from 18 per day in 2007. Most of those are older veterans, rather than those who served after 9/11. The real suicide numbers may be higher, though, since the VA’s statistics are based on death certificates from 21 states not including California or Texas, which have the largest population of veterans. "I believe the secretary, as well as President Obama, care about veterans and are motivated to fix this problem, unlike the previous administration," says Gene Jones, a veterans' advocate and member of the board of directors of Veterans for Common Sense, a national nonprofit veterans service organization. "But it’s a convoluted issue. We’re talking about an enormous bureaucracy that works well in some places around the country, but not in others. We need to encourage VA to keep working to fix this and do what we can to help them. But something has to change, and if it doesn’t we need to start firing people. The claims problem is a national crisis." Hardie agrees. “We all hope this new computerized system will be a success,” he says. “But we have heard this before. VA leadership just keeps making the same promises. Apple and Google are changing our planet, yet in this age of technology it is unimaginable that the VA can’t tap into these technological advances to solve these problems.” Jamie Reno, an award-winning correspondent for Newsweek for 17 years, has also written for The New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Rolling Stone, People, Men’s Journal, ESPN, Los Angeles Times, TV Guide, MSNBC, Newsmax, Entertainment Weekly, and USA Today. Reno, who’s won more than 85 writing awards, was the lead reporter on a Newsweek series on the 9/11 terrorist attacks that earned him and his colleagues the National Magazine Award for General Excellence, the highest award in magazine journalism. Reno, who’s also an acclaimed author, singer-songwriter, and 15-year cancer survivor, lives in San Diego with his wife, Gabriela, and their daughter, Mandy. For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

Thought the following may be of interest. All have a nice weekend. --------------------- WASHINGTON, DC – The Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs held a hearing yesterday afternoon on issues related to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) 100 percent temporary disability rating. According to a report by the VA Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the 100 percent temporary disability rating is not being reevaluated in a majority of cases, which results in overpayments. The report estimated that these overpayments would cost VA $1.1 billion dollars over the next five years. ---------------------- Date of this article: Thursday, February 7th, 2013 Link to this article: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/07/va-disability-ratings-subject-of-house-hearing/

Just days before he leaves office, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is recommending military pay be limited, effectively decreasing troop salary next year. Panetta will recommend to Congress that military salaries be limited to a one percent increase in 2014. The Pentagon has calculated that the 2014 Employment Cost Index (ECI) from the Labor Department is expected to be above one percent, but wants to still cut back on pay due to “budget uncertainties,” one department official told CNN. In 2013, a 1.7 percent increase was approved, based on the ECI, which has been the basis for military pay for the last several years. Three Pentagon officials have confirmed details of the plan to CNN. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have also agreed to Panetta’s proposed pay plan. Final approval for the pay would come from Congress in the form of the 2014 budget. By Barbara Starr ------------------------- Article is here: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/02/06/first-on-cnn-panetta-to-recommend-pay-cut-for-military/ ------------------------ Thought this may be of interest to all.

thought this information would of interest. the link is below. all have a nice weekend. http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2013/01/gannett-auditors-say-va-overpaid-disabled-vets-012413/

thank you for your help.