Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vietnam Vets To Launch $5b Lawsuit

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Forwarded, courtesy of Kelly Franklin….

VIETNAM VETS TO LAUNCH $5B LAWSUIT

By KRISTIAN SOUTH - Sunday News | Sunday, 6 May 2007

Prime Minister Helen Clark and every other living prime minister, governor general, minister of health and minister of defence since New Zealand entered the Vietnam war will be targeted in the incredible $5 billion lawsuit planned by vets.

{So should our nation’s Veterans – Every President, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Health, and every Secretary of Veterans Affairs, for the Malfeasance described below.}

{Should it make a difference that a federal agency or elected officials was part of knowingly allowing this malfeasance, a nice way to say criminal activity, to continue? Only our government and our elected officials think so.}

The Vietnam Veteran's Action Group has launched the sensational bid to sue the government and key political figures because they blame them for lack of action over their poisoning by Agent Orange. {As it should be!}

The veterans have engaged giant Australian law firm Slater & Gordon -which won a $1.5b lawsuit against industrial corporation James Hardie - to handle the case.

Sunday News understands Slater & Gordon bosses will meet in the next few days to discuss tactics. "Slater & Gordon has been approached by a group of veterans and we are investigating the situation," a firm spokesman last night told Sunday News. But Sunday News understands the law firm is serious about taking the case and this week's talks will drill into the specifics of the vets' claims.

The proposed lawsuit will allege consecutive governments and officials since 1962 were guilty of "malfeasance" and failed to provide duty of care to veterans. Malfeasance is a term used when public officials break the law and bring harm to others while in office. In some cases, it can result in criminal charges.

Clark last night declined to comment on the pending lawsuit and referred all questions to defence minister Phil Goff, who said the Government had addressed the needs of veterans in a recent $30m Agent Orange compensation package. "You can't say, `We'll take what we were given in the settlement and then we'll go for everything else as well'," Goff told Sunday News. "That's not how these things work."

News of the pending lawsuit comes as Goff and veterans affairs minister Rick Barker are due to decide on how to administer Agent Orange payouts.

But only veterans who suffer from five recognized symptoms of Agent Orange exposure are covered - leaving hundreds of others to battle illnesses like cancer and heart disease without government compensation.

Under the scheme, fewer than 100 vets will get around $40,000 if they are suffering from four specific cancers and a skin condition, chloracne.

Children of vets are eligible for $25,000, subject to them suffering from conditions limited to spina bifida, cleft lip, cleft palate and two types of cancer. {Thanks to the excellent malfeasance work of our Veterans Affairs and our NAS/IOM our veteran’s children with paternal exposures only qualify for spinda bifida.}

Vietnam Veterans' Action Group spokesman Bruce Weir said more than 1300 former soldiers and war widows were expected to be represented in the class action. "We are bringing this lawsuit against the government to ensure all veterans and their families are adequately looked after by the New Zealand government," Weir told Sunday News. "The current package covers less than five percent of the veterans and that is not good enough.

"We feel we have been betrayed and we are taking this issue to court to ensure it is sorted out properly.

"We are hoping to expose the deceit, lies and cover-up in the High Court so the New Zealand public can see exactly what the Vietnam veterans have had to battle against." {Same as in this nation.}

Last year, Sunday News revealed how genetic tests on Vietnam vets had shown being exposed to Agent Orange was worse than experiencing a nuclear explosion - with up to seven generations of significant DNA damage found.

Weir said the lawsuit would be seeking about $4 million for every veteran registered in the class action. “You're looking at punitive damages for 40 years of lies, cover-up and deceit and if it went to court I would imagine we would be seeking $4 million per veteran," he said. {Yes, the same in our nation – 40 years of government collaboration and deceit to deny Veterans compensations in death and disability, as well as widows, and orphans and of course protect the all important chemical company lobby money.}

"So with 1300 plaintiffs, you're talking about a lot of money. But when you're looking at several generations of damaged DNA, the veteran community needs to know that everyone is covered.

"Of the 3200-odd persons who served in Vietnam, approximately 550 have died since the war finished and these days more are dying every week. Many of these deaths could have been prevented had the Government's key personnel done their job properly."

Weir said the class action lawsuit was open to veterans and the families of deceased veterans. Indications were about 1300 veterans, war widows and families of veterans would register.

I wish them all well in this endeavor of Justice and Government Accountability. As one that defends the nation that should be a given, not an assumption.

Kelley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use