Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Evaluation For Appeal

Rate this question


hp1030

Question

Sir's And Madams:

I will be evaluated this next Friday by C&P in the continuation of my appeal.This after they reduced my disability benefits(2004-2005) from 50% to 10% disabling after over 10 years of this condition been established without any improvement .

The evaluating doctor will be the same doctor that reduced my benefits without even looking at my medical record, as per copy of the evaluation for skin disorders that reduced my benefits.

I have lesions on my face, back, trunk,upper and lower extremities and buttocks, but he wrote that the extent of involvement was only 10%. Should I express my concern to him about this???

Some weeks after, I saw this doctor for the first time as a Dermatologist in consult from my PCC(not a "C&P evaluator") and he wanted to take me to the local Medical School for a conference in regards to my skin condition...???!!! Very interesting case, he said.

I have plenty information from my VA medical records of treatment consult, and procedures for my skin disease and also Independent Medical Opinions, should I bring those to be included with the C&P record?

This taking into consideration that my record was not taken in account at all for the last inaccurate decision.

Any advice or previous experience will be appreciated.

Thanks in Advance;

HP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Jay:

The doctor did not meet ANY requirement, But they still went ahead and reduced my benefit from 50% to 10 % after over 10 year without improvement and the condition worsening. I have many medical opinions stating so. What else do you think I might need to do?

What else can I Do before Friday??

I thank you guys.

Was the contrary opinion(s) done around the time of the C&P exam? If so, the totallity of the medical evidence should clearly be in your favor and you could appeal on that grounds and, perhaps, CUE it at the same time for reasonable doubt not being used. However, if the C&P was new information and all the RO had to go on (IE - they didn't have any recent IMOs), then you would have to take only the appeals route while adding as much contrary evidence as you can. In the end, you should win, provided you get the right documentation....the VA can't dismiss more qualified doctor's based on less qualified opinions (they do, but they'll lose in the end if you present your case properly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay:

I have appealed.

This C&P evaluation(next Friday), I guess was ordered by the RO, before deciding if they send the appeal to the board(?).Problem is, it will be the same evaluating doctor who reduced the benefit in the first place.

Yes, all the opinions were done close to the C&P exam.

The RO had information with contrary evidence against the C&P evaluation at his disposal.They allegedly did a "di novo" review!?.

They based the reduction on the % of skin involvement, the C&P doctor said it was 10 percent,with a progressive condition involving face, trunk, upper and lower extremities and the buttocks.????

Please describe "right documentation" and what a "proper case" is if you will.

Because there is nothing more I want right now, with you guys help;

than to win.

Thanks to all in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay:

I have appealed.

This C&P evaluation(next Friday), I guess was ordered by the RO, before deciding if they send the appeal to the board(?).Problem is, it will be the same evaluating doctor who reduced the benefit in the first place.

Yes, all the opinions were done close to the C&P exam.

The RO had information with contrary evidence against the C&P evaluation at his disposal.They allegedly did a "di novo" review!?.

They based the reduction on the % of skin involvement, the C&P doctor said it was 10 percent,with a progressive condition involving face, trunk, upper and lower extremities and the buttocks.????

Please describe "right documentation" and what a "proper case" is if you will.

Because there is nothing more I want right now, with you guys help;

than to win.

Thanks to all in advance.

If the RO is setting you up with a C&P AFTER making a decision to lower you than they are not very sure of their rating in my opinion. They did the same thing to my wife when they tried to lower her....they basically sent us a letter saying she had been lowered, but asked for a C&P at the same time, which is odd. In VA terms, it is more difficult on them to argue a claim down, so starting you off on a lower level gives them the upper ground. Basically, in order to lower a claim the VA is "supposed" to have new, material evidence that outweighs prior evidence and a mere review (short of CUE) does not meet that standard, but they do it anyway.

Were you seeing a regular doctor for your skin problem during this entire period? The "right documentation" would be any and all information about your disbaility that is as recent as possible.

Also, find out what this C&P doctor's credentials are....does he specialize in skin disorders? Is he an MD, PA, NP, etc? What is your primary doctor's credentials? Is he a specialist? If not, can you see one ASAP?

The VA does this stuff all the time.. they see a case that looks iffy and they get some doctor to go over the medical records as a basis for lowering the case (without even seeing the veteran). This can work if the vet has not been seeing a regular doctor and has no recent medical evidence to back up a claim, but if you have recent medical opinions this doctor's opinion will mean very little.

So, don't panic or anything and get as much medical evidence as you can and see where it goes. You may even want to consider a CUE at this point because lowering based on a single doctor's review of your case seems like a violation of the regs (unless that doctor could prove CUE himself).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jay:

I have to see a "regular" doctor since my condition continues to worsen. All this information has been provided to VA.

Is there a criteria or a format to prepare a CUE claim???

Should I wait for the resolution of this matter?? recently I called the regional office and they said I only had my appeal on file no more claims, and this is not true.Do they stop all claim to go ahead with the appeal??

Thanks in advance to all.

HP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a scenario for a CUE claim at all.

CUE info can be found here under the search feature.

It appears to me that they have not considered all of your medical evidence-

I dont know what type of skin disorder you have but I suugest you go to the BVA web site and search it and see how they determined the ratings for it-

then again it should be in the proposed reduction paperwork-

Your medical evidence has to support that you still warrant the 50% based on the Schedule of Ratings for your skin disability.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This most certainly could be a CUE claim, as the VA may have violated both reg 3.102 and 3.104, but that depends, in part, on whether or not you furnished them with "new and material evidence", which would allow them to reopen and review the case (the VA cannot reopen a case based on old information unless it determines CUE on itself, even though they do all the time).

Even if you did prompt the review with new medical evidence, you may still have a CUE claim with reasonable doubt (3.102), but that is a very grey area to be in. Basically, if all of your prior information says you are 50% and all of your new information says you are worse than before, one doctor's opinion cannot meet the reasonable doubt criteria.

However, if, as berta says, they made a scheduling error in the first place (IE - your disorder did not warrant a 50%), then you have a very uphill battle and no CUE would apply. But, I'm doubting this is the case, though it's possible.

To me, this is another great reason why vets should NEVER use VA health care. I don't care what they say about the medical part being separate from the compensation part, once you add new medical evidence to your Cfile, they can review you whenever they see fit. If you go to a civilian they are not privy to that "new and material evidence".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use