Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Evaluation For Appeal

Rate this question


hp1030

Question

Sir's And Madams:

I will be evaluated this next Friday by C&P in the continuation of my appeal.This after they reduced my disability benefits(2004-2005) from 50% to 10% disabling after over 10 years of this condition been established without any improvement .

The evaluating doctor will be the same doctor that reduced my benefits without even looking at my medical record, as per copy of the evaluation for skin disorders that reduced my benefits.

I have lesions on my face, back, trunk,upper and lower extremities and buttocks, but he wrote that the extent of involvement was only 10%. Should I express my concern to him about this???

Some weeks after, I saw this doctor for the first time as a Dermatologist in consult from my PCC(not a "C&P evaluator") and he wanted to take me to the local Medical School for a conference in regards to my skin condition...???!!! Very interesting case, he said.

I have plenty information from my VA medical records of treatment consult, and procedures for my skin disease and also Independent Medical Opinions, should I bring those to be included with the C&P record?

This taking into consideration that my record was not taken in account at all for the last inaccurate decision.

Any advice or previous experience will be appreciated.

Thanks in Advance;

HP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Berta:

I agree they have not considered even half of the information provided. If we went by the Schedule of Ratings for my skin disability I would have to be rated at 60%. My private doctors states that the skin involvement is over 60% with constant corticosteroids treatment according to this info, It should be rated at 60% disabling. Correct?

My main diagnosis is Mycosis Fungoides a type of T cell lymphoma,but VA call's it Dermatitis.????

7806 Dermatitis or eczema.

More than 40 percent of the entire body or more than 40 percent of exposed areas affected, or; constant or near-constant systemic therapy such as corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs required during the past 12-month period 60%

20 to 40 percent of the entire body or 20 to 40 percent of exposed areas affected, or; systemic therapy such as corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs required for a total duration of six weeks or more, but not constantly, during the past 12-month period 30%

So I do not think there was a scheduling error. Just a contrary to law rating reduction.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have your private doctor write up a medical history with a current diagnosis and future prognosis in great detail. With that, it should be an open and shut case. Also, request to use your civilian doctor as your C&P instead of the one they assigned, or, at least, get them to assign a different MD because this one is obviously using bias in his/her decision making process.

Also, I think you have grounds for a CUE here based on what you've said. The VA cannot simply send your C-file to any random doctor to reevaluate it without new and material evidence (3.156). Also, under 3.105 it clearly states that, "(:P Difference of opinion. Whenever an adjudicative agency is of the opinion that a revision or an amendment of a previous decision is warranted, a difference of opinion being involved rather than a clear and unmistakable error, the proposed revision will be recommended to Central Office. However, a decision may be revised under §3.2600 without being recommended to Central Office.". I had the same issues with my wife's case in which one RO tried to supersede another RO without ANY new evidence to the contrary.

I feel this is a tactic by the VA to get you into a C&P in order to take a "legal" look into a particular case.....by giving some lame excuse (in your case a "review), they get you into a C&P before your C&P date and once you take that C&P you have provided them with "new and material evidence" in which they can now justifiably alter your claim. But, based on solely that MD's "review" they cannot lower your compensation...it stands in stark contrast to the regs I listed (and several others).

Hang in there; you'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you guys:

I think I am ready now for this C&P eval.

I will bring progress notes, psych progress notes an IMO and the last evaluation by my private dermatologist.

I will also bring the last blotched C&P exam by the dermatologist who reduced my benefits (soon to retire!!!) and copies of previous C&P exams and determinations which granted SC and 50% disability rating since 1994.

I will hand deliver this info to the RO with a statement of the case. I do not think any of this info was ever considered appropriately.

Berta,,,, Jay,,,,Vike,,, any new advice?

Am I on thwe righ path?????

Thank you so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn;t it illegal to have the same doctor do it again?

Not sure --Vike would know-

I hope the C & P doctor is recetive to your information-

especially the IMO- at least the doctor will know you have an IMO-

And copies of all that you have should also be sent to the VA - Do you mean the 21-4138 form-

Statement in SUpport of Claim---

available at the VA web site-

Always a good cover letter to use when submitting additional evidence.

(I always forget to use it- my vet reps never used one for 3 years re my claim evidence.)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use