Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The "baghdad Boil."

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

FWD FROM Colonel Dan

Note this has been noted for soldiers serving & training in the US SW

desert, AZ, NM, CA, TX, NTC

Spread of disease tied to US combat deployments

Stateside doctors are left grappling

By John Donnelly, Globe Staff | May 7, 2007

<http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/05/07/spread_of_disease_tie

d_to_us_combat_deployments/>

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles...of_disease_tied

_to_us_combat_deployments/

WASHINGTON -- A parasitic disease rarely seen in United States but common in

the Middle East has infected an estimated 2,500 US troops in the last four

years because of massive deployments to remote combat zones in Iraq and

Afghanistan, military officials said.

Leishmaniasis , which is transmitted through the bite of the tiny sand fly,

usually shows up in the form of reddish skin ulcers on the face, hands,

arms, or legs. But a more virulent form of the disease also attacks organs

and can be fatal if left untreated.

In some US hospitals in Iraq, the disease has become so commonplace that

troops call it the "Baghdad boil." But in the United States, the appearance

of it among civilian contractors who went to Iraq or among tourists who were

infected in other parts of the world has caused great fear because family

doctors have had difficulty figuring out the cause.

The spread of leishmaniasis (pronounced LEASH-ma-NYE-a-sis) is part of a

trend of emerging infectious diseases in the United States in recent years

as a result of military deployments, as well as the pursuit of adventure

travel and far-flung business opportunities in the developing world, health

officials say.

Among those diseases appearing more frequently in the United States are

three transmitted by mosquitoes: malaria, which was contracted by 122 troops

last year in Afghanistan; dengue fever; and chikungunya fever.

Nathan Yang , 42, a civilian from Dorchester, contracted visceral

leishmaniasis -- the most serious form of the disease -- most likely during

a vacation to Greece last September. Yang, who works for an Internet travel

company, said it took Boston doctors more than three months to determine

what was causing his night sweats, chills, and low-grade fevers.

Fortunately, prodding by Yang's sister, an infectious disease doctor

practicing in Annapolis, Md., led to a test at a US military laboratory,

which found that he had the disease. Until then, a doctor had suggested

removing Yang's spleen, which was enlarged because of the illness.

"It was kind of worrying not knowing what it was," said Yang, who said he

feels much better after taking medications.

Leishmaniasis has long hounded the US military in its past deployments to

the Middle East.

During World War II, troops in the Persian Gulf region reported high

incidences of the disease; during the deployment for the first Gulf War, in

1990-91, just 31 cases were reported -- which received large headlines in

the United States because it was unusual. But military officials interpreted

the numbers as an improvement, reflecting good preventive techniques as well

as troops spending more time in urban areas.

But the increasing cases in the last few years, which has gone almost

completely unnoticed, has been due in part to a breakdown of efforts aimed

at protecting troops from getting bitten by sand flies, military officials

acknowledged. About 80 percent of the cases are from Iraq and most of the

others are from Afghanistan.

When Army Colonel Peter J. Weina , director of the leishmania diagnostics

laboratory at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring,

Md., spent months traveling around Iraq in 2003, he found that some

commanders had taken no precautions to guard against infection.

The military recommends making sure troops have bed nets and uniforms

treated with the insect repellant permethrin , applying the chemical DEET to

exposed areas of skin, and wearing long pants, socks, and long-sleeved

shirts while outside.

"In some areas, every one had heard about bed nets and about leishmaniasis,

but other military units were totally oblivious," Weina said.

He said the lack of attention to leishmaniasis is understandable, though:

"From the perspective of the person on the ground, they are bombarded with

so many concerns. The way the war is going now, getting a little sore that

may or may not go away is minor compared to losing your leg" in a roadside

bomb attack.

The sand flies, which are a third the size of a mosquito, don't actually

fly, but hop, giving them a limited range. Weina took sand fly samples from

several parts of Iraq and found parasites from Basra to Mosul. He also found

scores of cases of Iraqi children hospitalized with leishmaniasis.

The World Health Organization estimates 2 million new cases of leishmaniasis

each year in 88 countries, ranging from rain forests in Costa Rica to the

deserts of Iraq and Iran. In the United States, infections are very rare.

On average, about 100 American tourists or business travelers have

contracted the disease in recent years, more than in past years because of

more frequent travel to areas where the parasite flourishes, the US Centers

for Disease Control and Prevention said.

The sharp increase in cases in the US military has also raised concerns

about transmission of leishmaniasis from person to person.

While scientists found little evidence suggesting that the disease can be

transmitted through blood transfusions, the US Food and Drug Administration,

not wanting to take a risk, advised in late 2003 that US citizens traveling

to Iraq should not be allowed to donate blood for a year upon their return

-- and Americans diagnosed with leishmaniasis should be banned from donating

blood over their lifetime. Weina, the Army medical researcher, said there is

less reason to believe that the disease could be transmitted through casual

or sexual contact. While some cases suggest that leishmaniasis might have

occurred between couples, Weina said, no scientific study has proven it. But

the wife of a civilian contractor who returned from Iraq with leishmaniasis

said she fears she may have already been exposed to the disease.

"If you consider it can be transmitted sexually, and my husband has it, and

I could have it as well, I'm furious," said Marcie Hascall Clark of

Satellite Beach, Fla., whose husband, Merlin, spent two months clearing

minefields in Iraq. Clark said she was also concerned because symptoms of

leishmaniasis sometimes do not show for months or even years in some cases.

"I worry that a lot of soldiers are coming back and they don't even know

they have it," she said.

Beverly Rorrer of Zanesfield, Ohio, said her husband, Ken, served seven

months in a National Guard unit in Iraq and returned home last fall with a

large sore on his left leg. After waiting months for a correct diagnosis,

Rorrer said, they learned about leishmaniasis only after she happened to

watch a PBS documentary.

"I've told more than a few people that it's amazing what is out there in

this world," Rorrer said. "We are fortunate and blessed not to come in

contact with it every day."

John Donnelly can be reached at <mailto:donnelly@globe.com>

donnelly@globe.com.

<http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/File-Based_Image_Resource/dingbat_story_

end_icon.gif>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use