Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
allan
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject: MS and the Military
http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/react...oodsoldier.html
"If, as some believe, the causative agent is a
mycoplasma, vaccinations could conceivably be the mode of
transmission."
April 18, 2000
REACTIONS OF A KINDLY NATURE
by Ed Gherman egehrman@p...
A Good Soldier
Questions about VA Disability and Multiple Sclerosis
He fell suddenly, not a hundred feet from my moving car. It was a
solid,
bone breaking tumble and I was surprised when he got to his feet,
brushed
himself off and resumed walking hesitantly toward a car parked next
to the
curb from which he'd just fallen. I drove slowly alongside, then
braked and
asked if he were all right. He smiled when he saw me; I recognized
him as
one of my daughter's friends, Sam. I had known him for over ten
years. We'd
met just after his return from an enlistment with Army Rangers. It
had come
as a shock to all of us when we learned he had Multiple Sclerosis.
He'd
gone to a doctor because of numbness in his leg and blurred vision
and
after extended testing, was diagnosed with the disease.
Over the years I'd hear bits and pieces of Sam's progress from my
daughter.
After I witnessed his fall, I asked her for an update and she told
me that
he'd had some problems walking and that he was using a cane most of
the
time. I asked her what he was doing for money and she said that he
was
getting paid by the Army, full disability and all medical benefits.
I was
dumbfounded and told her that she must be wrong and would she check
as soon
as possible. She did and confirmed that he was indeed receiving full
benefits and that MS was considered a service connected disability.
I found this so hard to believe that I contacted Sam myself and he
agreed
to an interview. He confirmed that he was on disability. He said
that the
VA will grant disability status if the condition becomes apparent to
a
degree of ten percent or more within seven years from the date of a
veteran's separation from the service. Sam didn't realize he was
eligible
for these benefits until a friend, an ex-serviceman, told him, three
years
after his initial diagnosis. The VA confirmed Sam's disability and
service
connection.
I'm glad that Sam's needs are being met by the VA. He was a good
soldier.
But it's difficult, if not impossible to understand the VA's
reasoning and
justification for granting disability status and a service
connection for
MS. There is no know cause for MS. If the cause is unknown, how can a
connection be made between a person's stay in the service and MS? It
doesn't make sense. A service-connected disability can be granted
for any
condition which is incurred or aggravated by a veteran's military
service.
The big questions are: What is it in the service environment that
causes
folks to become susceptible to MS and how did the VA make a
connection
between this environmental factor, service in the armed forces, and
Multiple Sclerosis?
Multiple Sclerosis is an unpredictable disease of the central nervous
system. Myelin, which facilitates the high speed transmission of
electrochemical impulses between the brain and the spinal cord,
becomes
scarred and hardened into what are known as plaques. These multiple
plaques
damage the myelin and cause the neurological transmissions to be
slowed or
blocked completely which leads to diminished and, sometimes, lost
functioning. The symptoms, severity and duration of MS varies from
person
to person. Most patients experience muscle weakness and loss of
muscular
control, fatigue, vision problems and cognitive impairments such as
poor
memory and concentration. Other symptoms include pain, tremor,
vertigo,
bladder and bowel dysfunction, depression and euphoria.
There are 350,000 Americans who have MS and about two hundred new
cases are
diagnosed each week. Most folks experience their first symptoms
between the
age of twenty and forty, rarely before fifteen and seldom after
sixty.
Caucasians are more than twice as likely to contract MS than other
races;
MS is five times more prevalent in temperate climates than in
tropical.
There does seem to be a genetic relationship or connection between
those
who are susceptible to MS. In the population at large, a person has a
one-tenth of one percent chance of contracting MS but if one person
in a
family has MS then the other family members have a three percent
chance of
getting it also.
The cause for MS is not known. Some think it's an auto immune
disease that
launches an attack on its own tissues. While this is certainly a
clear
possibility, nothing conclusive has ever been established. One
plausible
theory is that the causative agent could be a unique microorganism
such as
a mycoplasma. These poorly understood organisms are able to alter
protein,
and then sensitize the host against itself. For example it was found
that
mycoplasmas can cause the formation of the rheumatoid factor. A
similar
mechanism could apply to Lupus and many other auto immune disorders.
Another interesting factor is that females, who are infected four
times
more frequently with mycoplasmas than males, are twice as likely to
contract MS.
But this is all only speculation because the truth is we simply
don't know
what causes MS. Then how did the VA decide that MS was connected to a
person's stay in the Armed Forces? I wrote the Department Of Defense,
through Barbara Boxer's office, and they refused to answer any
questions. I
also contacted the Veterans Administration. They did confirm that MS
was a
service connected disability and answered some of my inquiries. They
seemed
puzzled that I was skeptical of the MS disability designation and
informed
me that "congressional legislation would be required to change these
provisions of the law".
There are currently about eleven thousand veterans who have been
granted a
service connected disability for MS. The only condition is that the
disease
be confirmed within seven years of a veteran's separation from
service. As
any one familiar with the labyrinthian process of obtaining a service
related disability can attest, it isn't easy getting money from the
VA. The
problems surrounding "Gulf War Illness" is a certain reminder of
this fact
The VA and the Department Of Defense must possess information that
they're
not sharing with the rest of us and certainly not with the new
enlistees. I
know the Sergeant isn't telling new recruits that they should look
out for
MS, as they do with AIDS or syphilis. If there is a chance that MS
might be
contracted or complicated by their time in military service, then why
aren't enlistees told this? Would this complicate the recruitment
process?
Probably, but I have the sneaking suspicion that it would complicate
something far more important to the modern Armed Forces:
vaccinations. This
is the one factor, aside from the traditional haircut, that all
service
folks have in common. If, as some believe, the causative agent is a
mycoplasma, vaccinations could conceivably be the mode of
transmission.
What bothers me most is that I'm sure the VA and the DOD have
research that
justifies granting this disability to thousands of veterans. If they
have
information that connects MS to military service, then we should all
know
what that information is. Multiple Sclerosis is a serious and growing
disorder that afflicts millions of persons. To purposefully withhold
information that would better our understanding of this disease is
unjustified.******
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
Popular Days
May 9
3
May 11
1
Top Posters For This Question
allan 2 posts
Pete53 1 post
Vike17 1 post
Popular Days
May 9 2007
3 posts
May 11 2007
1 post
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts