Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Legal Beagle Question

Rate this question


Berta

Question

It is my understanding that lawyers can only be hired after a NOD has been filed.

Also the VCAA states that a legal VCAA notice -specific to the claimed disability as well as the response elction form will be sent out to the claimant PRIOR to the initial denial--

yeah right-

In my letter to Senator Schumer I am asking him to propose an amendment to 38 USC -Part IV, Chap 51, SubChap 1, Section 5103-

aka the VCAA as follows (still trying to word it better)

Upon receipt of a VCAA letter or notice that is not highlighted as to a statement specific to the veteran or widow's claim, clearly identifying exactly what the claimant needs as defined within Kent V Nicholson as to a "unique character of evidence", which the claimant can attempt to obtain and send to the VA, and/or upon lack of receipt of a VCAA Response/Election form, the veteran's representative, agent, or attorney can file claim of prejudicial error citing Kent V. Nicholson,20 Vet App 1 (2006) and request that proper VCAA letter or Notice required as within Kent and/or VCAA Election form be sent to the claimant with copy to the representative within 60 days.

My question-should I leave "attorney" out?

The VCAA should come before the initial denial and thus before the NOD is filed-

(the whole purpose of the VCAA)

anyone see what I mean- maybe I could just say agent and/or representative?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest jangrin

Berta,

It's good--- but don't forget to list the "claimant" first.

---- Veteran (claimant), Veteran's Representative, Agent, Attorney---

Actually, listing attorney, may be redundant. Since an attorney is an agent, and rep.

Jangrin

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES!!!! of course DUH!!!!!!!

THANKS Jangrin

It really ticks me off to read the VCAA regs and know that our SOs and vet reps get copies of what we get- and they know right away -if the VCAA letter we got is illegal.

I actually sent the director of my POA the VCAA regs because he didnt know what a real VCAA letter was.

I am using as evidence to support this request from Sen Schumer- the entire BVA Chairman's report of 2006, the BVA web site itself, and also a gripe about how I almost became part of the backlog due to VCAA violation.

I havent gotten a legal VCAA letter in over 4 years.

I am sending Sen Schumer what I got and what I should have gotten.

From the Buffalo VARO- whose director just got bonus of $10,000-in the RO offices -steps away from Senator Schumer's Buffalo Senate office ----in the same building.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta,

Outside of VA circles I have seen where the use of representitive is inclusive of attorney. Thus it could be redundant.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use