Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Berta
The proposed regs are about 24 pages long-
they include this clause and I had no idea that VA counsel had any jurisdiction over our reps-I don't know if this is a new criteria or if it was always somewher in the regs but I sure never saw this before-
I had a recent matter with Regional Counsel up here at the Buffalo VA-
it was obvious to him I am sure that I had gotten lousy representation up to that point.I believe I used the term 'idiots' referring to 2 of my reps- and certainly told him they didnt have a clue on basic VA 101.
I sure am copying this baby-------
(d) Accreditation or authority to provide representation on a
particular claim shall be canceled when the General Counsel finds that
the performance of an individual providing representation under Sec.
14.630, representative, agent, or attorney before VA demonstrates a
lack of the degree of competence necessary to adequately prepare,
present, and prosecute claims for veteran's benefits)
the whole thing is here-from the proposed regs that are still open for public comment until first week in June at the Fed Reg wqeb site.
© Accreditation or authority to provide representation on a
particular claim shall be canceled when the General Counsel finds, by
clear and convincing evidence, one or more of the following:
(1) Violation of or refusal to comply with the laws administered by
VA or with the regulations governing practice before VA including the
standards of conduct in Sec. 14.632;
* * * * *
(4) Presenting to VA a frivolous claim, issue, or argument. A
claim, issue, or argument is frivolous if the individual providing
representation under Sec. 14.630, representative, agent, or attorney
is unable to make a good faith argument on the merits of the position
taken or to support the position taken by a good faith argument for an
extension, modification, or reversal of existing law;
(5) Suspension or disbarment by any court, bar, or Federal or State
agency to which such individual providing representation under Sec.
14.630, representative, agent, or attorney was previously admitted to
practice, or disqualification from participating in or
[[Page 25940]]
appearing before any court, bar, or Federal or State agency and lack of
subsequent reinstatement;
(6) Charging excessive or unreasonable fees for representation as
determined by VA, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; or
(7) Any other unlawful, unprofessional, or unethical practice.
(d) Accreditation or authority to provide representation on a
particular claim shall be canceled when the General Counsel finds that
the performance of an individual providing representation under Sec.
14.630, representative, agent, or attorney before VA demonstrates a
lack of the degree of competence necessary to adequately prepare,
present, and prosecute claims for veteran's benefits.
(e) As to cancellation of accreditation under paragraphs © or (d)
of this section, upon receipt of information from any source indicating
improper conduct, or incompetence, the Assistant General Counsel of
jurisdiction shall initiate an inquiry into the matter. If the matter
involves an accredited representative of a recognized organization,
this inquiry shall include contact with the representative's
organization.
(1) If the result of the inquiry does not justify further action,
the Assistant General Counsel will close the inquiry and maintain the
record for 3 years.
(2) If the result of the inquiry justifies further action, the
Assistant General Counsel shall:
(i) Inform the General Counsel of the result of the inquiry and
notify the individual providing representation under Sec. 14.630,
representative, agent or attorney of an intent to cancel accreditation
or authority to provide representation on a particular claim. The
notice will be sent to individuals providing representation on a
particular claim by certified or registered mail to the individual's
last known address of record as indicated on the VA Form 21-22a on file
with the agency of original jurisdiction. The notice will be sent to
accredited individuals by certified or registered mail to the
individual's last known address of record as indicated in VA's
accreditation records. The notice will state the reason(s) for the
cancellation proceeding and advise the individual to file an answer, in
oath or affidavit form or the form specified for unsworn declarations
GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
Popular Days
May 21
3
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 2 posts
SLEDGE 1 post
Popular Days
May 21 2007
3 posts
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts