Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

100%

Rate this question


sbrewer

Question

Finally got a knew computer so everything is not going black at the bottom. I wrote in last week about my husband getting 100% and what was needed for the ID cards and so forth. We have now got all that taken care of, waiting on forms for me to apply for CHAMPVA, but I think we have everything else. Now, here's my question....

He recieved 70% but paid at the 100%PTIU for mental, however he was denied for his heart. Should he appeal that decision and if so what will happen. Can they take back the 100%PTIU or is it safe?

Thanks,

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

sbrewer,

"Can they take back the 100%PTIU or is it safe?"

No, the VA cannot "take back" the 100%IU P&T on a DRO review or appeal, unless there was a CUE involved.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Take back" is a tricky phrase.....can they review the decision and change it, without CUE, as per the regs? No. Have they done it anyway? Heck yeah. They did it to my wife when we simply changed regions. The decision to drop her from 100% P&T with A&A (just received several months before moving mind you) to 50%, was made because, and I quote, "the VA does not grant A&A for a person's willingness to hurt themselves (why they took away A&A)" and "The evidence does not warrant a 100% rating". They based this on a note saying she was able to handle her own finances (to get her out of the god awful fiduciary program).

Eventually, we won the money back (all but the A&A, but we got homebound), but only because I fought them tooth and nail and got in touch with the director of the RO in Seattle.

So, P&T is safe ONLY if you give them absolutely no reason to look at your file...once you open it up, you are subject to the rater's discretion, regardless of the regs saying they cannot do so.

Filing appeals for separate disorders (once already 100%) is a judgment call...personally, I would leave well enough alone. The regs are certainly on your side in this matter, but that doesn't mean the RO cannot put you on the defensive and force you to win the rating back on appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought is if the condition, such as a cardiac condition, has the capacity to eventually, directly or indirectly, cause the veteran's death, I would fight the decision to deny service connection for that condition.

I'm thinking about DIC for the surviving spouse.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, DIC is a big deal, especially with a heart condition. On the plus side, I don't think an RO likes to question itself....I think my wife's case is more of a "my RO is better than your RO" type of case. In all likelihood, your spouse's TDIU P&T should be fine, just be sure to get copies of the exam (for the heart issue) and don't offer up any personal details that do not pertain to the heart issue (unless asked).

Again, the VA regs are on your side here, but there is NO penalty if an RO does not follow regulations, so they tend to break them from time to time. In the end, you'd likely win back anything they tried to reduce anyway, but it can make life hell in the meantime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Vike sorry but I have seen it done too. Nope they shouldn't be able to by the regs, but I've seen it happen. Personally I would open the box though, simply because of the DIC issue.

Bob Smith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with all below. A heart condition that should be SC'ed should be fought. If the veteran passes from a heart related disease it would be exteremly hard to SC it for DIC purposes at that point. If this was a recent award then I think you should be ok (just my opinion). Was it a solid SC for the mental issue or did you have to appeal in order to obtain SC?

Six good to see you again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use