Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Effective Dates

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

" (2) The effective date of an award of increased compensation

shall be the earliest date as of which it is ascertainable that an

increase in disability had occurred, if application is received

within one year from such date."

So - is this talking about an increased RATING for something that was already granted SC --or increased compensation - in general.

In my husband's case - If he was 20% Service Connected on his back and knee - but recieves an increased COMPENSATION based on his cancer -- can the claim go back to the date it can be shown the increase in disability occured - if he filed within one year of that date?

With all the talk of Congress being specific where Congress intended to be specific --

Is an increase in disability only increased ratings in disabilities already SC'd? Or does an increase in disability also include percentage of disability increasing due to an additional Service Connected condition?

Free

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ricky,

Carlie is correct. In your senario you presented it would be the date eof the claim, January 30, 2004. Even if the veteran had some sort of medical documentation showing the disability actually increased in severity on January 15, 2004, it wouldn't result in a higher amount of compensation because payments would start on February 1rst in both cases.

Vike 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vike - thanks. I have seen several claims from my RO in which they attempted to begin the effective date the date of the C&P exam because there was no medical documentation showing the increase until the C&P.

I fully understand the need for medical evidence but do not feel it is the vets fault if the VA can not offer a C&P until 12,24 30 months etc......after the receipt of the claim.

If it were my claim I would see my own doctor to get the increase medically documented but some vets can not afford to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I might add this during my 2nd C&P I mentioned another problem I was having and when I got my rating they actually included it back 8 months prior to my CP I did mentioned at the time that I had had the problem for well over a year but hey 8 months is not bad.

stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vike - thanks. I have seen several claims from my RO in which they attempted to begin the effective date the date of the C&P exam because there was no medical documentation showing the increase until the C&P.

I fully understand the need for medical evidence but do not feel it is the vets fault if the VA can not offer a C&P until 12,24 30 months etc......after the receipt of the claim.

If it were my claim I would see my own doctor to get the increase medically documented but some vets can not afford to do so.

Ricky,

That seems pretty damn ludicrous to me. Which RO is that? Using that logic, do they also only grant s/c for originally claimed disabilities (such as PTSD) from the date of their C&P examination and not from the date of claim? That is BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen it on initial claims for SC, only on request for an increase. I recently read on in which the veteran asked for an increase from 0 percent on his back to 20 percent. This was Jan 05. He was given a C&P in July 05 from which they approved an increase to 10 percent in an January 06 rating decision. Problem is they made the effective date January 06 the same date the rating decision was issued.

I understand that crap happens sometimes as many claims are processed by the VA. However, when it is the same type of crap happening time and time again one has to begin to wonder. You know, those things in life that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmm. We have always be able to get them striaght but each incident has required a look by the BVA as the response to the NOD and DRO review was even more stupid than the original rating decision. It is the Montgomery RO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

or in some cases- by documented medical evidence- possibly a year earlier than that-

Can you explain this further?

Betrayed

540% SC Schedular P&T

LOWER YOUR EXPECTATIONS AND THE VA WILL MEET THEM !!!

WEBMASTER BETRAYEDVETERAN.COM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You hit the street, you feel them staring you know they hate you you can feel their eyes a glarin'

Because you're different, because you're free, because you're everything deep down they wish they could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use