AO vets were denied proper retro under the Nehmer Stipulation and only received their legally determined EED comp when NVLSP went into VA and legally kicked butt- with the law-Nehmer-
VA attempted the same thing with CLL vets-
CLL vets with NVLSP fighting the battle in their behalf have WON!
"Appeals court orders agent orange benefits
Judges take VA officials to task on unpaid retroactive claims
By Josh Richman, STAFF WRITER
Article Last Updated: 07/20/2007 02:40:33 AM PDT
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was wrong to deny retroactive benefits to certain Vietnam veterans suffering from Agent Orange-related leukemia, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday in a class-action suit filed in the Bay Area.
In 2003, the VA issued a regulation finding chronic lymphocytic leukemia to be a disease associated with dioxin, a toxic substance in the Agent Orange chemical defoliant U.S. forces used in the jungles of Vietnam. But the VA didn't reconsider prior claims of Vietnam veterans suffering from that disease, nor did it pay them retroactive benefits.
A 1991 law and a court consent decree ordered that those suffering from diseases that are newly considered to be service-related could have their cases reconsidered and their back benefits paid. The VA, however, contended this didn't apply to diseases deemed to be service-related after the law's 2002 original sunset date.
U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson of San Francisco disagreed in 2005, and the appeals court affirmed his judgment Thursday with some harsh words for the VA.
"Three different Congresses in three different decades have enacted legislation signed by three different presidents, designed to ensure the payment of such benefits to veterans afflicted with Agent Orange-related ailments," Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote for himself and Circuit Judges John Noonan and Milan Smith Jr.
"What is difficult for us to comprehend is why the Department
of Veterans Affairs, having entered into a settlement agreement and agreed to a consent order some 16 years ago, continues to resist its implementation so vigorously, as well as to resist equally vigorously the payment of desperately needed benefits to Vietnam War veterans who fought for their country and suffered grievous injury as a result of our government's own conduct."
Question
Berta
IS VA arbitrary and capricious?
Does VA ever defy the Law ?
Yes and double yes as many AO Vets know------
AO vets were denied proper retro under the Nehmer Stipulation and only received their legally determined EED comp when NVLSP went into VA and legally kicked butt- with the law-Nehmer-
VA attempted the same thing with CLL vets-
CLL vets with NVLSP fighting the battle in their behalf have WON!
"Appeals court orders agent orange benefits
Judges take VA officials to task on unpaid retroactive claims
By Josh Richman, STAFF WRITER
Article Last Updated: 07/20/2007 02:40:33 AM PDT
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was wrong to deny retroactive benefits to certain Vietnam veterans suffering from Agent Orange-related leukemia, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday in a class-action suit filed in the Bay Area.
In 2003, the VA issued a regulation finding chronic lymphocytic leukemia to be a disease associated with dioxin, a toxic substance in the Agent Orange chemical defoliant U.S. forces used in the jungles of Vietnam. But the VA didn't reconsider prior claims of Vietnam veterans suffering from that disease, nor did it pay them retroactive benefits.
A 1991 law and a court consent decree ordered that those suffering from diseases that are newly considered to be service-related could have their cases reconsidered and their back benefits paid. The VA, however, contended this didn't apply to diseases deemed to be service-related after the law's 2002 original sunset date.
U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson of San Francisco disagreed in 2005, and the appeals court affirmed his judgment Thursday with some harsh words for the VA.
"Three different Congresses in three different decades have enacted legislation signed by three different presidents, designed to ensure the payment of such benefits to veterans afflicted with Agent Orange-related ailments," Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote for himself and Circuit Judges John Noonan and Milan Smith Jr.
"What is difficult for us to comprehend is why the Department
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of Veterans Affairs, having entered into a settlement agreement and agreed to a consent order some 16 years ago, continues to resist its implementation so vigorously, as well as to resist equally vigorously the payment of desperately needed benefits to Vietnam War veterans who fought for their country and suffered grievous injury as a result of our government's own conduct."
from:http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_6421417?source=rss
Edited by BertaGRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
9
3
1
1
Popular Days
Jul 20
6
Oct 29
4
Jul 22
2
Oct 28
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 9 posts
keepugessn 3 posts
Ricky 1 post
jbasser 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 20 2007
6 posts
Oct 29 2007
4 posts
Jul 22 2007
2 posts
Oct 28 2007
2 posts
16 answers to this question
Recommended Posts