Around The Mulberry Bush I Go Again With The Amc

[Josephine]

Greeting to all,

Well, Here I go around the Mulberry Bush again.

I thought that I was getting somewhere with this AMC claim.

The Rating Specialist had my claims file exactly one year ago this month to go back to the "two psychiatrist."

It went back to her/him again.

I was told that the " Rating Supervisor" had the claim to sign.

Not true!! The Rating Specialist turned the file over for more information.

Berta was correct. The letter by my doctor sent April 2006 was not present in my claim and neither was the letter by my Pastor, per the request of the remand.

This is why my doctor received the last letter to which he sent his fouth letter to them.

Now, I am told again, all the information is in the file, but who knows, it has been 12 months for the person that checked the file to not see that they were not present.

Lidel told me today that the file went from the " Rating Supervior" to Claims Examiner to place each paper in its correct order to go back to the " Rating Specialist".

He told me to call back tomorrow to make sure that the claim was back at the " Rating Specialist".

How does so many people check a claim to find out a year, that they have lost important papers.

I have been moved up to an anwer by " Thanksgiving". I forgot to ask him which year. I will make a point to ask him this question tomorrow.

This will make 18 months at the AMC and this is an " Advancement on the Docket"

Josephine

Edited October 17, 2007 by Josephine

[Josephine]

I wish that I could locate who at the AMC is taking out my records.

To be at the Rater twiced, September 2006 and again September 2007 and each time a different important record is missing.

Back to the filing cabinet my file goes.

Ms. Dunlap is trying to get the Manager of Development to get it and work it.

I just don't think this time when it makes it to the rater, they can use this excuse.

I took every one of the important records to the Regional Office and had them date stamped and they mailed the originals to the AMC.

I, in turn took the copies and had the US Navy Recruiter fax them through for me.

I don't think they can loose date stamped records? Can they?

I finally with my hesitancy contacted Senator Warners' Office for assistance.

I just talked to his office and was told they would call the AMC and see if they could get my claims file out of that darn cabinet.

I am afraid that I share Allens opinion of these people, they are all a bunch of crooks. I am tired of the lies and deceit.

Always,

Josephine

[allan]

>I don't know what we would do without those Highly Skilled Workers

Those skilled workers must have gotten their training in prison. Sending them back to prison with the rest of the thieves should be our goal since they refuse to provide us with due process.

Josephine,

Your evidence is likely sitting in your folder like mine. If the BVA can remand my claim over and over back to the appeals center and the RO theives consistanly ignore the evidence in it, it's set up that way and it's not going to change. The BVA says in the remand that what they are doing is illegal and in violation of DVA laws. The RO level is so corrupt, 30 yrs of watching them lie tells me it will never change, neither will the senseless remands.

You may want to consider waiving review by the RO level and have the BVA decide it.

Due process is not part of the RO or DRO review. It's way to corrupt for that.

Anytime you talk to someone at the AMC, you will be lied to. Get used to it.

[Josephine]

>I don't know what we would do without those Highly Skilled Workers

Those skilled workers must have gotten their training in prison. Sending them back to prison with the rest of the thieves should be our goal since they refuse to provide us with due process.

Josephine,

Your evidence is likely sitting in your folder like mine. If the BVA can remand my claim over and over back to the appeals center and the RO theives consistanly ignore the evidence in it, it's set up that way and it's not going to change. The BVA says in the remand that what they are doing is illegal and in violation of DVA laws. The RO level is so corrupt, 30 yrs of watching them lie tells me it will never change, neither will the senseless remands.

You may want to consider waiving review by the RO level and have the BVA decide it.

Due process is not part of the RO or DRO review. It's way to corrupt for that.

Anytime you talk to someone at the AMC, you will be lied to. Get used to it.

Allen,

Let me see if I have this correct. I was at the BVA and remanded to the AMC.

I have been at the AMC now for 18 months. I placed a waiver against the R. O making any decisions.

Are you saying that I may have my claims file moved completely from the AMC and back to the BVA for a decision.

I can't believe a word the AMC is saying for you are correct they are all liars.

Always and Thanks,

Josephine

[allan]

My claim has been collecting dust at the AMC since it was remanded from the BVA in June 06.

As soon as it was remanded, I sent in the waiver.

When and if the AMC ever opens my file for review, they will see the waiver sitting on top and it will than be sent to the BVA.

My guess is it will take another two to three years for the BVA to decide it, once they recieve it.

That gives me "no" garanty the BVA will reconize the three IMO's from Dr Bash. But if the BVA denies the claim, my 30 year wait to have an attorney represent me will be over and my claim will fanally have its day in court.

If you have sent in a waiver for RO rating process to the AMC, nothing will be done to it until the BVA recieves the file. The waiver takes it out of the RO level review, so they can't process it. If they're telling you they're working on it, they are lying.

Allan

[Josephine]

My claim has been collecting dust at the AMC since it was remanded from the BVA in June 06.

As soon as it was remanded, I sent in the waiver.

When and if the AMC ever opens my file for review, they will see the waiver sitting on top and it will than be sent to the BVA.

My guess is it will take another two to three years for the BVA to decide it, once they recieve it.

That gives me "no" garanty the BVA will reconize the three IMO's from Dr Bash. But if the BVA denies the claim, my 30 year wait to have an attorney represent me will be over and my claim will fanally have its day in court.

If you have sent in a waiver for RO rating process to the AMC, nothing will be done to it until the BVA recieves the file. The waiver takes it out of the RO level review, so they can't process it. If they're telling you they're working on it, they are lying.

Allan

Allan,

I am sorry that I know so little about the ways of the VA.

When I received my Supplemental Statement of the Case by the Huntington Regional Office, I sent a waiver to the Regional Office that any new evidence that I sent in could not be decided by the Regional Office.

My claims file then went to the BVA December 2005. I advanced on the docket and my claims file was remanded to the AMC April 2006.

It has been at the AMC for 18 months now, twiced to the rater and each time my important imformation is missing.

I am now back in the filing cabinet, as Development sent me another VCAA notice.

Can I still have the BVA decide my claim?

Josephine

[chess]

I think the Cleveland Regional office is even worse than Florida. Altho 845 days is unthinkable, the Cleveland Regional Office uses delays as denials. My claim was started May 2002 and after 5 years 5 months, it still has not been decided. They are supposed to have a "Tiger team" deal with claims over 1000 days, but mine will soon be 2000 days. I am in the process of writing a "writ of Mandamus" asking the court to force them into a decision..they have lost or ignored at least 8 documents from my claim, that I can document! Others that they lost or threw away, I cant document.

Im sure they will get bonuses for their fast service to veterans.

The Cleveland regional Office is ranked dead last in compensation to Veterans, according to the Institute for Defense Analysis.