Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Interesting Gulf War Vet Syndrome

Rate this question


Berta

Question

from Colonel Dan:

Those with Gulf War Syndome, or unexplained illnesses, specially if you live near Inman SC, should make contact with

H. Hugh Fudenberg, MD, nitrf@hotmail.com

NITRF Director of Research

Neuro Immuno Therapeutic Research Foundation

NIT Research Foundation

226 Edgewater Rd.

Inman, SC 29349-8663

Phone(864) 592-8076 http://www.nitrf.org/

"Some of my patients who received the 17 vaccines, many poorly if at all attenuated, developed full blown illness even though the war ended 2-3 days before they were to be sent over, and they remained on U.S. soil for the whole duration of the conflict, never setting foot in the Gulf3.

Full article at: http://www.nitrf.org/gulf.html partial reprint below

Gulf War Syndrome

I read with great interest Gary Matsumoto's essay "The Pentagon's Toxic Secret" (Vanity Fair, April 1999) regarding the possible role of squalene in Gulf War Illness. Squalene is an ingredient of "Freund's adjuvant", rarely given to humans. It boosts humoral (antibody) response to the antigen given together with it (causing "polyclonal gammopathy"), but depresses cell-mediated immunity. Antibody immunity is involved in protection against sugar coated organisms, such as meningococcus, streptococcus, pneumococcus, etc., whereas cell-mediated immunity protects against viruses and strange organisms including parasites, yeast and other fungi, mycobacterium tuberculosis and mycobacterium of leprosy.

Too much of this can lead to marked overproduction of antibody to a single injected agent, resulting in a malignancy of the antibody producing cells -- termed multiple myeloma. Freund himself died of multiple myeloma, as did several other immunologists of his vintage (right after World War II), who were engaged in studies using this new adjuvant. (This was 20 years before cell-mediated immunity was known.)

As a member of a committee appointed by the National Research Council of the Natl. Acad. of Sciences, I had an opportunity 20 years ago to examine the records of technicians working at our biologic warfare facility; Fort Detrick, Maryland, who had been injected with "preventative" vaccines to protect against those organisms with which they were working. These technicians all had polyclonal gammopathy. We were given records, but none showed that they had been given Freund's adjuvant. I have also corresponded with the then-Asst. Secretary of Defense handling Gulf War illnesses in 1996. He did not mention Freund's adjuvant. This plus Anthrax bacillus would form a deadly combination.

The RAND Corporation has recently issued a report on Gulf War Illness that makes no mention of vaccines or petrochemicals. The role of vaccines in both suppressing cell-mediated immunity and causing infection have been well-documented by several authors (see below), but have been covered up by US Defense Department and British Ministry of Defense. This follows papers in the Lancet, 16 January on the Gulf War Illnesses by Catherine Unwin and colleagues1 and Khalifda Ismail and colleagues2 conclude that "there is no unique Gulf War syndrome" are a great oversimplification- and completely unwarranted; at least 3 Gulf War illnesses exist, either alone or in combination.

The first of these syndromes (approx. 80%) is due to the marked depression of cell-mediated immunity by more than 3 vaccines given simultaneously-and many soldiers received 17 simultaneously3; many of these were hurriedly and poorly attenuated, and hence potent infectious agents, but with a prolonged latent period.

In my many inquires of patients and their physicians over 4 years (1993-96) until at least 12 months ago, neither the many Dept. of Defense, Veteran's Administration or physicians in private practice asked the patients about vaccines (a "hush" topic); nor were any relevant immune function tests performed--or any test of cell mediated immunity3. I called these to the attention of the American Department of Defense on many occasions (reply to first letter enclosed) and the British Ministry of Defense in 1996. I have published that tests of cell mediated immunity have a characteristic profile in 80 per cent of those so diagnosed, and this pattern is restricted to vaccine recipients not exposed to petrochemicals or organophosphate insecticides.3

About 20-25% of all U.S. troops, and of British and Canadian troops in the area, developed symptoms. However, none of the French, Algerian, or Moroccan troops, all of whom refused the vaccines, developed symptoms of this illness. Some of the troops from the Czech Republic and Slovakian Republic who received these vaccines developed identical symptoms. However, the incidences of those receiving the vaccines in Slovakia and the Czech Republic and those developing the highly infectious Gulf War syndrome with its characteristic symptoms are unknown.

Some of my patients who received the 17 vaccines, many poorly if at all attenuated, developed full blown illness even though the war ended 2-3 days before they were to be sent over, and they remained on U.S. soil for the whole duration of the conflict, never setting foot in the Gulf3.

The role of the vaccines is complicated by the pyridostigmine administration--the latter caused severe vomiting and diarrhea for as long as it was taken, and most of the American troops date the onset of illness from the day after they began taking "the pill".

Unless and until they are treated successfully (with immunotherapy), these veterans do not remember that there was an interval of 6-18 months before other symptoms appeared, including in some, a blindness of about 15 months duration, for which ophthalmologists could find no cause, a finding suggestive of anthrax.

The second of the Gulf War syndromes is apparently associated with, and presumably due to, ORGANOPHOSPHATE TOXICITY. Seventy-seven per cent of British Troops refused the vaccines4. But the British troops were housed in tents painted with organophosphates to protect against mites and other insects.5 In addition to the symptoms of the 1st group, they developed other symptoms including tightness in the chest, coughing, dyspnea, and pulmonary edema (the cough and breathing difficulties were originally ascribed by the US Defense Dept. to fine sand particles6), bizarre behavior, sweating, salivation, and blurred and/or dark vision. (This agent inhibits blood cholinesterase; it was originally developed as a biologic warfare agent!) Requests to the US Defense Department for information on whether any American troops were housed in such tents, what percent of these received the vaccines and what percent did not, remain "classified information." The American troops with this syndrome whom I have talked to said they slept on the ground and wore petrochemical insecticide collars. It is noteworthy that the French troops (who, again, refused the vaccines), under separate command, refused such pesticides7.

However, M. Hooper, Professor Emeritus of Medicinal Chemistry from the University of Sunderland, has obtained some data by spending much time visiting with officials of British Gulf War Veterans Associations7 The same agent is used in some areas of the U.S. as an insecticide and in Northern England for "dipping" sheep to protect against insect infestation, The "sheepherders syndrome", indistinguishable in symptoms from those described above,8 is now defined as recognized medical entity by the Ministry of Health9; is no longer considered psychological, and sheep dipping is no longer mandatory. Many of the victims have myocardial disease, a finding characteristic of many patients with Coxsackie virus -induced myalgic enkephalitis, and in an experimental model thereof in inbred mice by mouse Coxsackie virus B69. Furthermore, the selective immunosuppression observed in CFIDs and in organophosphate toxicity is also induced by Coxsackie B virus infection10

The third Gulf war illness is related to being drenched in petrochemical-soaked clothing for 3 days, after explosion of oil wells by Allied missiles.10 The percentage of troops who suffered from such environmental exposure is unknown, and those who previously had (or developed from such exposure) petrochemical hypersensitivity therefore had additional symptoms11- some are now universal reactors to all chemicals. Some Czech troops had both vaccine exposure and petrochemical exposure of the type outlined if not described above.

Some of those with petrochemical hypersensitivity who also received the vaccines had symptoms of Myalgic Enkephalitis plus neurologic symptoms similar to multiple sclerosis. The situation is further complicated by the so-far lack of data on differences in symptoms between those that received vaccinations plus the "pill" versus those that received vaccinations without the pill; and also between data on those who were and those who were not exposed to massive doses of organophophosphates (the French were not); and between those who were exposed to the vaccines with, and those who received vaccines without, petrochemical exposure, etc.

The article by Dr. Ismael and Dr. Wessel, one of the co-authors referred to above, implies that there is no characteristic illness; they appear unaware, since the illness of those who received the vaccines was highly infectious,6 with 80% of spouses and 60% of children living in the same household developing the same symptoms, and 40% of DOGS and/or CATS IN THE HOUSEHOLD DEVELOPING NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS,5 again within 6-18 months after exposure to an affected veteran. Perhaps the other 20% who did not infect household contacts suffered from type 2 or 3, rather than type 1 GWI.

I have also seen silent carriers of the infectious agent(s) e.g., a healthy Canadian nurse who apparently transmitted disease to her mother12 The mother developed the disease 6 months after exposure to her daughter for 3 months beginning in Nov. 1993. SEVERE SYMPTOMS DEVELOPED in March 1994. The carrier, a nurse who had worked in a Saudi Hospital, had been on vacation in Canada at her parents' house during these 3 months, before returning to the Gulf Hospital.) Symptoms persist to this day, undiminished in severity, and the patient is confined to the house, as she is now a "UNIVERSAL REACTOR" to all chemicals. Her daughter remains well, but the daughter's child, age 25 months, was hospitalized in the same Hospital with a mysterious illness."

__._,_

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use