Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Fast Letter 07-15-07

Rate this question


Wings

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

 

 

 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans Benefits Administration

Washington, D.C. 20420

June 6, 2007

 

Director (00/21) In Reply Refer To: 211A

All VA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 07-15

 

Subject: Public Law 109-461

 

This letter provides information concerning the new legislation governing the recognition of agents and attorneys representing claimants before VA. Enclosure One provides general answers to questions employees may receive during interviews or when answering telephones.

 

Background

 

On December 22, 2006, the President signed Public Law 109-461. Section 101 of Public Law 109-461, the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, amends chapter 59 of title 38, United States Code, governing the recognition of individuals for the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of claims for benefits before VA. The provisions shifting the entry point for paid representation are effective on June 20, 2007, and the provisions relating to fee assessments and review of fee agreements are effective upon publication of VA's final rule.

 

Summary of New Legislation

 

Section 101 of Public Law 109-461 makes the following amendments to 38 U.S.C. §§ 5902, 5903, 5904 and 5905:

Eliminates the current prohibition on the charging of fees for services of an attorney or agent provided before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) makes its first final decision in the case. As amended, section 5904 will allow accredited attorneys and agents to charge fees for services provided after a notice of disagreement (NOD) has been filed with the VA Regional Office (RO) in the case.

Authorizes the Secretary to collect an assessment from an individual recognized as an agent or attorney under section 5904 in any case where VA pays the agent’s or attorney’s fees from past-due benefits owed to a claimant. The amount of the assessment shall be equal to five percent of the amount of the fee paid to the agent or attorney from past-due benefits. The assessment may not exceed $100. An agent or attorney who is charged an assessment may not receive reimbursement for such assessment from the claimant. VA will deposit the amounts collected in an account available for administrative expenses for veterans’ benefits programs.

Authorizes VA to regulate the qualifications and standards of conduct applicable to agents and attorneys.

Adds four additional categories to the list of grounds for suspension or exclusion of agents or attorneys from further practice before VA.

Authorizes VA to review fee agreements between agents or attorneys and claimants and order a reduction in the fee if the Secretary finds that the fee is excessive or unreasonable, although a fee that does not exceed 20 percent of the past due amount of benefits awarded on the claim will be presumed to be reasonable.

Eliminates fee matters as grounds for criminal penalties under 38 U.S.C. § 5905.

Subjects Veterans Service Organization representatives to suspension on the same grounds as apply to agents and attorneys.

 

Regulations

 

VA is amending its regulations governing the representation of claimants for veterans’ benefits in order to implement provisions of Public Law 109-461. VA published its proposed regulations in the Federal Register for notice and comment on May 7, 2007. After the proposed regulations are finalized, we will issue further guidance on the new regulations. Enclosure Two provides interim guidance for adjudicating attorney fee decisions after the entry point for paid representation changes on June 20, 2007, and the date the final regulations are effective.

 

Questions

Questions concerning this fast letter and other issues related to agent and attorney representation should be submitted to the VAVBAWAS/CO/21Q&A mailbox.

 

 

/S/

Bradley G. Mayes, Director

Compensation & Pension Service

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use