Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • Donate Now and Keep Us Helping You

     

  • 0

What To Ask For

Rate this question


mitchell3006

Question

:) This may take a little explaining. I wonder about posting ideas of what to look for as far as claims. Example: Vet has bad left knee. Obviously the left knee would be applied for. But many vets younger vets don't think to look at secondary problems like right knee due to over stress, maybe hip pain due to limp, back pain, or even GERD due to meds. They don't realize that the combination of these symptoms that is preventing them from having gainful employment may entitle them to more compensation. VA may only give them 10% for the left knee if they don't pursue the others.

Don't know if this is coming out right. I'm not talking about shotgunning or fishing but legitimate ideas for secondaries that many inexperienced or younger vets may not be aware of.

"We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor honours; but only and alone we fight for freedom, which no good man surrenders save with his life." - Letter from Arbroath AD1320
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I know I wish that someone could have given me direction about these things. I learned after several years that my GERD and stomach problems were due to the amount of NSAID's I had to take for SC issues. And I only recently learned that the reason I stay mad most of the time is because of depression that is caused by chronic pain from SC issues. I agree that someone shouldn't go fishing, but most of the younger vets don't realize that a is connected to b yet.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are right-

unfortuately we all have to be very proactive in filing for any possible condition that has SC potential-

from time to time I see claims at the BVA web site that were prepared incorrectly- the vet claimed a disability and then became locked in to it-

for example - a vet might have PTSD but they claim acquired psychiatric disorder-too vastly different things

or they will not realise as you said how many conditions can be socondary to other SC disabilities and even SC meds-

DMII is a good example-

SC DMII can cause transcient cerrbral ischemia, major storkes,LVH heart disease, atheorosclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfuncstion,skin problems, foot problems, and vision problems as well as probaby other problems too-

I had a vet who was trying for SC diabetes for over a decade.

The BVA denial said he had noted a drusen in his service records.

This single word Drusen-was missed not only by his POA but even by his attorneys (Leibermann et al) at the CAVC.

While he was here I looked up diabetes info and found that this means he had the first visual manifestation of diabetes in service-it is a sign of macular degeneration- right in VA's DMII training letter-symptomatic of diabetes effect to eyes and vision.

He won his claim.But the rating was wrong- he has CAD, skin problems, and other manifestations of his DMII that they totally ignored-

Every time I see a claim here-based on the info the vet states- I try to see if he/she has anything secondary to something else they mention.And you cant expect them to assume anything-

WHat I mean is say a vet has PH on DD 214 and major schrapnel wounds with scarring.He also just got a DMII diagnosis.He also has PTSD diagnosis and gets treatment from the VA for it.

If the vet files his first claim and only mentions the DMII as being claimed -the VA sure isnt going to consider his other SC disabilities because he didnt formally claim them.

Once in a while the VA will actually infer a disability that the vet has not claimed.And attempt to SC it.

I sure would not assume they do that often.

It pays to google lots of info on any claimed disability to see what else it can cause.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • OddBal79 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use