Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Remanded Claim From Bv

Rate this question


gdsnide

Question

I had a claim remanded from the BVA to the RO & they told the RO to expedite the claim & if one reads between the lines the BVA more or less told them they weren't to smart.

I have submitted a lot more evidence to my claim & it is almost all from VA Docs agreeing with my claim.

So, I was wondering if the RO has any time limit to respond to the BVA

I had a claim remanded once before & the RO sit on it for about 18 months.

This was before I found HADIT so I was like a Lamb in the woods & figured this was normal procedure but at present have my doubts,

Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

Thank U

GARY

gdsnide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

In the Board remand, did the Board state anything about the VARO sending you for additional C & P examinations as part of the claim development? If so, another question would be when the VARO intends to schedule you for that, or if there's anything of that nature needed to develop the claim.

I suggest you send an inquiry via the VA website using the IRIS system, and keep those e-mails for future evidence, along with the responses. You should also try sending a certified mail inquiry in, return receipt to confirm delivery. We needed written evidence of our attempts to gain information regarding the so-called "expeditious handling" of my husband's claims when we filed a request for a writ of mandamus to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. We had no recourse but to file the writ request due to a lengthy and still unresolved delay in handling a Board remand (actually four remands for the same condition over seven years, and two remands for a separate condition over three years).

Getting a writ granted is almost impossible (our request is pending the VA's reply to the Court's questions, now posed twice, regarding the status of the claim -- the VA gave some BS answer that didn't address the question the first time around, so the Judge pointed that out to them and gave them another 30 days to respond). Normally, the VA sees that a writ request has been filed, takes care of the remand, and then tells the Judge that the cause of the request has been resolved, then the Judge dismisses the writ request as moot. At least the veteran wins when the rating decision finally comes through.

As you know by now, "expeditious" is a meaningless term. The Court only gets involved when the delay is "unreasonable," and won't get involved if it's caused by the VA's workload or an "overburdened system," as the Court has ruled. It's hard in our case to argue the remand is due to the system being overburdened when there's much evidence in the Board's and Court's records that remands that are significantly newer than ours (the docket number starts with 94, which shows that the first appeal was filed in 1994) have been handled and resolved in the years between then and now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vickie,

No, the board didn't say anything about any C & P's.

Every Doc I see at the VA has agreed with me & signed forms to that fact that I sent in.

So, I don't see how they could send me to any C & P's as there are no more Docs to get claims from.

Guess I will wait a while & see what happens.

Thank U for your response.

GARY

gdsnide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary there is really no time lines on remands. This do it fast stuff in the remand is just fluff wording.

The reason the in between the lines told the RO they were stupid is because they let you find a way to present a valid argument to their idiotic decision.

Also if the last C&P you attended was over one year ago or it ends up being over one year ago when the idiots at the RO get around to the remand then do not be surprised if they send you to another exam. Exams within the past year are considered to be up to date and if they contain the necessary evidence to rate your claim then they are used. Normally if the exam is beyond the one year period, even if they contain the medical evidence to rate the claim, they tend to want it updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updating them would be no trouble at all because I have a good relatioship with all the Docs I see at the VA.

The report from a Psychologist they sent me to see (For 4.5 hours) was very recents & he said "I need A & A 24 hours a day.

Also have opinions from neuros,shrinks & my primary saying the same thing.

GARY

gdsnide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use