I received a rating of 50% for PTSD in 2006. (This has been recently increased to 100%)
I submitted a claim for sleep apnea secondary to and/or aggravated by service connected PTSD on October 23, 2007.
On my recent decision this is what they wrote:
Service treatment records do not show treatment for or dianosis of sleep apnea in service. The medical report from DR.XXXX relates that your sleep apnea was aggravated by your PTSD. Copies of sleep studies you submitted shwo that you are currently on a CPAP machine at night. VA respiratory examination was normal.
The effective date is October 23, 2007, the date of claim.
Service connection for sleep apnea has been granted because this condition, which was not incurred or aggravated in military service, permanently worsened as a result of a service connected condition. The difference between disability evaluations before and after military service determines the degree of disability subject to service connection. Prior to aggravation by a service connected condition, the disability was considered 50% disabling based on evidence that showed you had obstructiive sleep apnea and were placed on a CPAP machine. Following aggravation, the total disability is 50% disabling because this evaluation granted for being on a CPAP machine. The preaggravation percentage is always deducted before assigning any service-connected evaluation less than 100%. So as the preservice aggravation was 50% disabling and the current condition is 50% disabling, service connection for sleep apnea as aggravated by your PTSD is granted as 0%. Your current condition does not meet the criteria for the 100% evaluation as shown below.
The rating criteria for sleep apnea is: An evaluation of 30% is assigned for persistent day-time hypersomnolence. A higher evaluation of 50% is not warranted unless a breathing assistance device, such as a continuous airway pressurer (CPAP) machine, is required. A higher evaluation of 100% is not warranted unless there is chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale, or a tracheostomy is required."
If anyone can clarify for me what they are saying about how they are figuring the %, I would appreciate it.
Question
Ruffcreek
I received a rating of 50% for PTSD in 2006. (This has been recently increased to 100%)
I submitted a claim for sleep apnea secondary to and/or aggravated by service connected PTSD on October 23, 2007.
On my recent decision this is what they wrote:
Service treatment records do not show treatment for or dianosis of sleep apnea in service. The medical report from DR.XXXX relates that your sleep apnea was aggravated by your PTSD. Copies of sleep studies you submitted shwo that you are currently on a CPAP machine at night. VA respiratory examination was normal.
The effective date is October 23, 2007, the date of claim.
Service connection for sleep apnea has been granted because this condition, which was not incurred or aggravated in military service, permanently worsened as a result of a service connected condition. The difference between disability evaluations before and after military service determines the degree of disability subject to service connection. Prior to aggravation by a service connected condition, the disability was considered 50% disabling based on evidence that showed you had obstructiive sleep apnea and were placed on a CPAP machine. Following aggravation, the total disability is 50% disabling because this evaluation granted for being on a CPAP machine. The preaggravation percentage is always deducted before assigning any service-connected evaluation less than 100%. So as the preservice aggravation was 50% disabling and the current condition is 50% disabling, service connection for sleep apnea as aggravated by your PTSD is granted as 0%. Your current condition does not meet the criteria for the 100% evaluation as shown below.
The rating criteria for sleep apnea is: An evaluation of 30% is assigned for persistent day-time hypersomnolence. A higher evaluation of 50% is not warranted unless a breathing assistance device, such as a continuous airway pressurer (CPAP) machine, is required. A higher evaluation of 100% is not warranted unless there is chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale, or a tracheostomy is required."
If anyone can clarify for me what they are saying about how they are figuring the %, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Ruffcreek
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
4
2
2
Popular Days
Aug 18
7
Aug 19
5
Aug 22
2
Top Posters For This Question
LarryJ 4 posts
Ruffcreek 4 posts
Ricky 2 posts
jbasser 2 posts
Popular Days
Aug 18 2008
7 posts
Aug 19 2008
5 posts
Aug 22 2008
2 posts
13 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now