Jump to content
Ads Keep HadIt.com Online. Consider Turning Off Ad Blockers to Keep HadIt.com Online! ×

Medicare Drugs Bill

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think everybody needs to know this. Sorry about the politics.

Medicare Misery

The new Medicare bill is about to kick in, and what it offers to seniors isn’t pretty.

By Robert Kuttner

Web Exclusive: 01.02.06

The New Year brings with it Congressional mid-term elections. Here is an issue that should be a real political gift to the opposition party – the colossal Medicare drug-benefit mess.

It was clear back in 2003, when the Bush administration rammed this bill through the Republican Congress, that the purpose was not to devise an affordable prescription drug program for seniors. Rather the administration wanted to help two friendly industries, the pharmaceutical companies and the HMO’s; and to get bragging rights for the 2004 election that Bush had helped seniors. Few voters would grasp just how bad the law was, since its effective date was deliberately put off until 2006.

Now, as the year of reckoning arrives, the true cynicism of Bush’s program is becoming evident to each senior citizen (or adult child of senior citizen) who attempts to fathom what Bush and the industry lobbyists wrought.

For starters, coverage is woefully inadequate. You pay a $250 deductible and then a 25 percent co-pay on the first $2,250 of drug benefits each year, plus roughly another $450 a year in premiums. So if your prescriptions cost $2,250 a year, or about $190 a month, for prescriptions, you pay $1,200 a year all told and the plan pays just $1050.

That’s pretty shabby. But then, the truly bizarre feature of the plan kicks in. Coverage simply disappears, until you have spent nearly $3,100 out of pocket. This is the infamous "hole in the donut." Coverage kicks in again only after a total of $5,100 in prescription costs.

A great many seniors will never get the coverage because the plan is a bad bargain, and they just won’t sign up. Of if they do sign up, they will run out of the ability to pay enough out of pocket before qualifying for needed benefits. Even with these disgracefully skimpy benefits, the plan is expected to add over half a trillion to the federal budget over the next decade.

Why would anyone have designed such an insane program?

Because the political purpose was never to deliver good benefits. One administration goal, running the program through the private insurance industry, conflicted with the imperative of a clear, cost-effective plan. Seniors must evaluate innumerable competing private plans, each with subtle differences in costs and benefits that make an impenetrable program even less fathomable, and raise total costs because each of these private plans tacks on a profit. This was a case of privatizing something done far more efficiently through a direct government program.

The second administration goal, fattening the drug industry, led to a provision explicitly prohibiting the government from negotiating bulk price discounts from drug companies, as the Veterans hospitals do. As a result, according to a study by Families USA, drug prices obtained by the VA are about 48 percent less on average than those expected to be charged to people enrolled in the Medicare drug program. Among the twenty most widely prescribed drugs for seniors, for instance, a year’s supply of Protonix (for ulcers) costs the VA $253, but the seniors in the Bush Medicare program, which prohibits such bulk discounts, pay a sticker price of $1,080. That will give you ulcers! A year of Zocor, the cholesterol-reducing drug, costs the VA $251. Seniors in Bush’s drug plan get whacked for $1,323.

It was these inflated costs that necessitated some gimmick to keep down the overall cost to taxpaypers. Hence the notorious donut hole.

If the Democrats have the moxie and the wit, they should propose a straightforward fix, take it to the country in the 2006 elections, and dare Republicans to oppose it:

First, get rid of the costly crazy-quilt of private programs and bring the "Medicare" drug program back into public Medicare.

Second, allow Medicare to negotiate bulk discounts the way the VA does.

Third, get rid of the donut hole, and design a simplified benefit structure with modest co-pays and then 100 percent coverage after a set annual cap on out-of-pocket costs.

Finally, if the savings from the bulk price discounts are not quite sufficient to cover costs of filling in the donut hole, take back a little of Bush’s tax cuts to the richest one percent.

This debate will also remind voters of a useful meta-lesson. A party whose mantra is hate-government, and that sees government mainly as a vehicle for rewarding special-interest allies rather than serving ordinary citizens, can never be trusted to run government competently.

A happier New Year to all.

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect.

© 2006 by The American Prospect, Inc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • In Memoriam

Hey Wally,

I wanted to read this but I felt like the guy in clockwork orange. You know when they proped his eyes open and made him watch films. hehe

Just a joke Wally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A year of Zocor, the cholesterol-reducing drug, costs the VA $251. Seniors in Bush’s drug plan get whacked for $1,323.

I think that the VA is paying to much. Out of all the Meds I take I do think Zocpr is one of the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Wally,

I wanted to read this but I felt like the guy in clockwork orange. You know when they proped his eyes open and made him watch films. hehe

Just a joke Wally.

When you get a message that hurts your eyes to read it just highlight it and it will be more pleasant to your eyes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

Thanks Wally and railroader,

I read this finally. Seems this year I will look like the hole in a donut.

BTW if "None of the above" were put on the ballot for next presidental election it would win with about 70%

Edited by Stretch
Link to comment
Share on other sites


"I mean, even a card shark or a used car dealer could come up with a better deal or offer.


One of my brothers is 'both', I'll see if he's smart enough to build a more useless program.

'None of the above' is frequently my choice at election time.

Two of my other brothers used to dabble in the political scene, but not for a long period of time.....

They both said that they could not be a part of something so immoral.

Basically, 'almost' all politicians are liars and thieves and they do not try to hide it from their real supporters.

Real supporters would not be there if the election could not be influenced by their participation.

After the election they, the real supporters, always expect something in return for their help.

Money or power or both and they do get some.

The elected official gets to live in a world of false worth and unrealistic importance.

The 'real suppporters' benefit at our expense.

SNAFU (Situation Normal, All Fouled UP)


Edited by SLEDGE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • veterans-crisis-line.jpg
    The Veterans Crisis Line can help even if you’re not enrolled in VA benefits or health care.


  • question-001.jpeg

    Have Questions? Get Answers.

    Tips on posting on the forums.

    1. Post a clear title like ‘Need help preparing PTSD claim’ or “VA med center won’t schedule my surgery instead of ‘I have a question.
    2. Knowledgeable people who don’t have time to read all posts may skip yours if your need isn’t clear in the title.
      I don’t read all posts every login and will gravitate towards those I have more info on.
    3. Use paragraphs instead of one massive, rambling introduction or story.
      Again – You want to make it easy for others to help. If your question is buried in a monster paragraph, there are fewer who will investigate to dig it out.
    Leading too:

    exclamation-point.pngPost straightforward questions and then post background information.
    • Question A. I was previously denied for apnea – Should I refile a claim?
      • Adding Background information in your post will help members understand what information you are looking for so they can assist you in finding it.
    Rephrase the question: I was diagnosed with apnea in service and received a CPAP machine, but the claim was denied in 2008. Should I refile?
    • Question B. I may have PTSD- how can I be sure?
      • See how the details below give us a better understanding of what you’re claiming.
    Rephrase the question: I was involved in a traumatic incident on base in 1974 and have had nightmares ever since, but I did not go to mental health while enlisted. How can I get help?
    This gives members a starting point to ask clarifying questions like “Can you post the Reasons for Denial of your claim?”
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. This process does not take long.
    • Your first posts on the board may be delayed before they appear as they are reviewed. The review requirement will usually be removed by the 6th post. However, we reserve the right to keep anyone on moderator preview.
    • This process allows us to remove spam and other junk posts before hitting the board. We want to keep the focus on VA Claims, and this helps us do that.
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • VA Watchdog

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines