Below is my view that I sent to the VA via the VA's IRIS inquire system. Correlating my Rating decision with my C&P examiner and Medical records that I on occasion I sent to VA:
====================================
Dear Mr.:
I did not receive the notification letter with the information explaining the reasoning of the decision. I received a letter only stating that I was granted the award of 10%, nothing else as far as explaining the reasoning or rational of such decision.
From the explanation that you provided me I would like to point out the main paragraph and a few discrepancies that I noticed:
"
A 10 percent evaluation is assigned from March 13, 2008. The effective date is the date on which we received your claim for this condition. This disability is not specifically listed in the rating schedule; therefore, it is rated analogous to a disability that is closely related in function, anatomical location and symptoms. A 10 percent evaluation is assigned if there are two or more of the following symptoms: epigastric distress, dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, or substernal or arm or shoulder pain. In your case you report experiencing symptoms of heartburn and abdominal pain. You also said that sometimes the pain makes it difficult to eat or to
breathe, however, the records do not show that this has resulted in significant impairment of health. Based on the totality of the evidence, even though you do not meet the minimum criteria for the 10 percent evaluation, we are assigning the 10 percent
evaluation because of your complaints of significant pain.
"
There are some points that does not make any sense for me. First the C&P examiner states that: "He states that heartburn make it hard for him to breath" and heartburn is another word for pyrosis which is a painful burning sensation in the chest caused by gastroesophageal reflux, saying that the C&P examiner acknowledge the heartburn (other physicians on my medical records that I sent also mention heartburn as their diagnose). And dyphalgia is the same as difficult to eat which was clear reported by my C&P examiner, and even the difficult to breath and fatigue thereof in function of GERD. When my examiner pointed out that "The veteran states that he does not have reflux" it was understood between us that my examiner was referring to reflux as "throwing away" food, and not "acid reflux". Also the epigastric distress was stated and verified by my C&P examiner as follows: "There is tenderness to palpitation in the epigastria and bilateral upper quadrant areas." Not only my C&P stated it, but also in the medical records (that was sent) Dr. David J Majestic stated the following: " 29 y/o male with no sig pat medical history presents with 2 days of chest pain with deep breathing as well as epigastria pain. He has a burning pain in his abdomen that is worsened with inhalation; causes sharp pains to radiate diffuse through chest."
So all in all, I can not make sense of the following statement from the rater: "Based on the totality of the evidence, even though you do not meet the minimum criteria for the 10 percent evaluation, we are assigning the 10 percent evaluation because of your complaints of significant pain." since three of main symptoms were mentioned and stated by different doctors.
And if heartburn/pyrosis, epigastria pain, dysphalgia, chest pain, and even difficult to breath are not serious enough and do not constitute and consist in a high level of impairment I (and almost everybody else) would not know what a high level of impairment is all about. If the VA has any doubt about such conditions is the VA's duty to provide lab tests.
Question
tk3000
Below is my view that I sent to the VA via the VA's IRIS inquire system. Correlating my Rating decision with my C&P examiner and Medical records that I on occasion I sent to VA:
====================================
Dear Mr.:
I did not receive the notification letter with the information explaining the reasoning of the decision. I received a letter only stating that I was granted the award of 10%, nothing else as far as explaining the reasoning or rational of such decision.
From the explanation that you provided me I would like to point out the main paragraph and a few discrepancies that I noticed:
"
A 10 percent evaluation is assigned from March 13, 2008. The effective date is the date on which we received your claim for this condition. This disability is not specifically listed in the rating schedule; therefore, it is rated analogous to a disability that is closely related in function, anatomical location and symptoms. A 10 percent evaluation is assigned if there are two or more of the following symptoms: epigastric distress, dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, or substernal or arm or shoulder pain. In your case you report experiencing symptoms of heartburn and abdominal pain. You also said that sometimes the pain makes it difficult to eat or to
breathe, however, the records do not show that this has resulted in significant impairment of health. Based on the totality of the evidence, even though you do not meet the minimum criteria for the 10 percent evaluation, we are assigning the 10 percent
evaluation because of your complaints of significant pain.
"
There are some points that does not make any sense for me. First the C&P examiner states that: "He states that heartburn make it hard for him to breath" and heartburn is another word for pyrosis which is a painful burning sensation in the chest caused by gastroesophageal reflux, saying that the C&P examiner acknowledge the heartburn (other physicians on my medical records that I sent also mention heartburn as their diagnose). And dyphalgia is the same as difficult to eat which was clear reported by my C&P examiner, and even the difficult to breath and fatigue thereof in function of GERD. When my examiner pointed out that "The veteran states that he does not have reflux" it was understood between us that my examiner was referring to reflux as "throwing away" food, and not "acid reflux". Also the epigastric distress was stated and verified by my C&P examiner as follows: "There is tenderness to palpitation in the epigastria and bilateral upper quadrant areas." Not only my C&P stated it, but also in the medical records (that was sent) Dr. David J Majestic stated the following: " 29 y/o male with no sig pat medical history presents with 2 days of chest pain with deep breathing as well as epigastria pain. He has a burning pain in his abdomen that is worsened with inhalation; causes sharp pains to radiate diffuse through chest."
So all in all, I can not make sense of the following statement from the rater: "Based on the totality of the evidence, even though you do not meet the minimum criteria for the 10 percent evaluation, we are assigning the 10 percent evaluation because of your complaints of significant pain." since three of main symptoms were mentioned and stated by different doctors.
And if heartburn/pyrosis, epigastria pain, dysphalgia, chest pain, and even difficult to breath are not serious enough and do not constitute and consist in a high level of impairment I (and almost everybody else) would not know what a high level of impairment is all about. If the VA has any doubt about such conditions is the VA's duty to provide lab tests.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
1
1
1
Popular Days
Jan 7
6
Jan 6
1
Top Posters For This Question
tk3000 4 posts
Pete53 1 post
Cavman 1 post
gp747 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 7 2009
6 posts
Jan 6 2009
1 post
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now