Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

To Dav Or Not To Dav?

Rate this question


cvsp

Question

Little background.

Had a local program with a VSO that is not longer available to me (she left). I have taken over my case and learned a lot (thanks to Hadit and the folks). I was in contact with the local DAV office last Monday. I was told to call back today as they were at a travel board. Called back today and found out I was assigned to someone there, but he was not in on Mondays, and Tuesdays he is doing something else. I can call him Wed-Fri.

So just to get initial contact I am looking at 10 days. Frustrating! Bringing me the the question, is there anything that the DAV rep can do that I can not? Can he look into the VA system? Get status? Walk to the raters desk?

I guess what I am asking is should I put another hurdle in the way? Would it be to my benefit?

Thanks in advance.

Edited by cvsp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Other thoughts.

As far as paper-work and other things that need to be done, I am willing to take that on.

I have heard that a DAV rep can do more then I can. Look into VA systems. Call the rater. Go visit the rater.

If these are true then I think I need to at least pick one up. Maybe even have him just to fall back on?

This all depends on if they really can do like I said above. Things I cannot do. Otherwise I see it as just another frustration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

I have had a VSO make calls to the RO for me..he has phone numbers I cant get..that are NOT the call center. I have also heard of Vets, who have an excellent VSO, say to the effect that they first found out they were denied or approved by the VSO. I am certain, however, that is not always the case.

I think this would be a good question to ask a potential VSO, and would suggest you "shop around".

One critical issue is how successful they are at representing you at the BVA. Berta can even tell you how to look up that information.

Some guys think they know more than what they do. I see this very frequently with computers and/ or the game of chess. And they mess both of them up. Really smart, successfull people realize they dont know it all and surround themselves with people knowledgeable on issues they are weak on.

Frankly, since you are not sure, I vote that you get a VSO. If you are really, really confident that you know more than 4 or 5 of your VSO's, like, say, Berta, then you are ready to go it alone. Otherwise,

maybe you should just sit in the co pilots seat, and take over the controls only if the pilot blows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for vets filing and doing their own claims. Leave out the middleman. You are the one with the most interest in your own claim and you will do the best work on it.

You've shown a knowledge of what needs to be done...there are many resources to guide you through the process step-by-step.

Just my 2 cents worth. Good luck with whatever you decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I just hope I can keep my focus. My big question was the benefits of a DAV rep. I just noticed a post from Meddac where he mentioned that once you claim has been rated it is sent to your rep for review. Something that I could not get if I did it alone.

So I am seeing at least one benefit of having a DAV.

After reading Bronco's well put post. I am thinking I will go with the DAV. I just hope it does not mean that it will affect my claim timeline. I guess I can consult with the DAV rep. I went through C&P and someone already within the VARO added more claims to my claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I just hope I can keep my focus. My big question was the benefits of a DAV rep. I just noticed a post from Meddac where he mentioned that once you claim has been rated it is sent to your rep for review. Something that I could not get if I did it alone.

So I am seeing at least one benefit of having a DAV.

After reading Bronco's well put post. I am thinking I will go with the DAV. I just hope it does not mean that it will affect my claim timeline. I guess I can consult with the DAV rep. I went through C&P and someone already within the VARO added more claims to my claim.

Just be careful about going with a rep. Some of them work on a points system, and they will attempt to get you to claim additional issues or they will read into what you tell them and they will just claim additional issues. It happens a lot at my RO. I will call a veteran and start going over his claim, and find out that he doesn't want to alcim certain things. Usually they are things that are redundant to his/her original claim, and they have to be adjudicated separately even though they will not be rated as such.

As long as you are straight to the point of what you are claiming, that your claim is already "in process" , and that all you need is a rep, then your claim timeline should not be affected at all. DAV (or whoever you go with) will get to review and concur your decision prior to the award.

Don't get that confused with "they will make sure that you are getting what you deserve". Many of them look over the claim and make notes, and some of them don't have a clue what hey are looking at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Meddac. As usually great information.

I just realized something. There was a local branch here that I used a VSO for this claim. They are no longer there. I am assuming that the VA will try to contact her about the review once it is rated. This will of course be a dead end and cause a delay. Great. I will see what the experts say here and talk to Iris tomorrow about it.

I learned from IRIS last week that someone added issues to my claim. These came about from the C&P (99% sure). I sure hope this does not delay my claim.

Edited by cvsp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use