Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal Questions.

Rate this question


Guest Morgan

Question

I'm trying to put together the appeal letter and I have a tendancy to go on a rant and show how incompetent the rater (and ultimately, the service center manager) was in my husband's denials. Of course, I know that won't help anything, so I rant on paper and then go back and edit it all out. :P Anyone else do that?

Here's a question. Can a NOD be sent directly to the BVA instead of taking it through the VARO? There are so many blatant (undebatable) errors that I don't know whether to give the VARO a chance to correct them or go straight to the BVA, hoping it will at least slap their hands for the incompetence. I would like to surprise them with my findings of all the mistakes that prove flagrant misrepresentation of his competent medical evidence.

I found a BVA case almost identical to the sitiuation for my husband, and BVA granted SMC R (1). Does it do any good to include the relevant part of that decision in our appeal letter? I know BVA cases are not precedential, but the case states the application of the SMC regulations as they are related to my husband's situation too.

Carrie

Edited by Morgan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

"Here's a question. Can a NOD be sent directly to the BVA instead of taking it through the VARO? There are so many blatant (undebatable)"

Unfortunately a claim only gets to the BVA when the vet gets a I-9 formal BVA appeal form and sends it back to the VARO-the VARO gets a BVA docket number (they are about one and half year getting to these dockets)

The receipt of the I-9 form ,by the VARO, however- and there has been discussion on this here lately (Ricky wrote up a GREAT appeal)

can often trigger a better decision out of the VARO.

The I-9 will be attached to a denial letter with a SOC.

The SOC has to be pulled apart and argued with-

The VA medical opinions that go against the claim have to be challenged.

Anything positive for the claim has to be restated and the positive evidence should again be referred to.

The claimant should also make the point that they fall within the Benefit of Doubt criteria and then say they

"take exception to all errors of application of VA regs in 38 CFR, M21-1, any errors in application of duty to assist (I forget what else I posted) etc" that the VARO has made or that the BVA would make in deciding the appeal.

I think a claimant could ask for an SOC and the I-9 form at any time during the VARO process, however,

after an initial denial but it is only the I-9 form that gets a claim on the BVA docket for that long wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Berta. I will do it just that way. I had my claims cover letter written up just as Ricky wrote his appeal, hoping to avoid denials. But since VAROs have a problem reading English, I will do it again with the NOD and maybe the BVA will read. At least all of the research is done so I can use it again.

Should I include an excerpt of the similar BVA claim in the appeal? It is very close to my husband's claim. In fact, the other veteran only had a different condition for his second 100% rating. His was anxiety reaction, instead of pulmonary conditions. Both have regular aid and attendance, two 100% P&T, and SMC(p) f(4) for the second rating of 100% which brought it to the equivalent of SMC (M). They both had ratings above that, with his combined at 90% and my husband's at 60%. If the CUE had been considered, my husband's would have been 80%. They granted the other vet the SMC R (1). Of course, I have read BVA cases that ended with opposing decisions for the same thing, and I know BVA cases are not precedential. I don't want to clutter the appeal if it won't help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should hold onto that BVA decision as a reference but I don't think it will help here-

If it was exactly for the same conditions and your medical evidence is the same as what the BVA used -that is different matter-

I am waiting an SMC decision and told them exactly what I expect----SMR R-1 retro.

But it is filed as a CUE claim. In any event I have already prepared a statement that qualified the deceased vet, my husband, (with medical evidence) for the R-1 award in his lifetime yet was denied posthumously and never appealed.

Have you spelled out to them (like they are 12 years old) exactly why his disabilities fall under the 38 CFR 1114 SMR levels?

One of our hadit members did this for her dad's claim- Laurie-

it was a lot of work--- but she associated the SMC regs with the specific med evidence they had- it took time for them to get it right- but they finally did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use