Berta Posted April 9, 2006 Share Posted April 9, 2006 http://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0120695.txt I was searching for something else and read this- "Accordingly, the Board finds that the veteran knowingly, deliberately, and intentionally presented materially false and fraudulent statements to the VA in support of his claims for service connection compensation benefits, and due to such actions, he has forfeited his rights to VA benefits (aside from insurance benefits) under 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103(a). If the positive and negative evidence was in approximate equipoise, the law requires that the benefit sought be granted, as the veteran is entitled to the benefit of the doubt. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(B); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102 (2000). In this case, however, the positive and negative evidence is not in equipoise. Accordingly, the benefit of the doubt does not apply. ORDER Forfeiture was properly declared against the veteran pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103. The appeal is denied." Somehow this veteran gave VA false information and statements that triggered them to investigate him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In Memoriam Alex Posted April 11, 2006 In Memoriam Share Posted April 11, 2006 My postman is an MOH winner. I saw him wearing it at the Memorial and checked him out on the list of phonies (which is larger than the number of awardees). They would have awarded me one, except that, being an SP4/E4 at the time, I had to settle for a Star, like the other “swine” EM who pulled the heavy weight at the overrun camp at Nam Dong, only to see their CO walk off with the first MOH awarded in RVN. Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berta Posted April 11, 2006 Author Share Posted April 11, 2006 Alex- in the decades I have known you-(20 years I think) and due to all the advocacy and legal work you have done for veterans-for years and years ------ in my mind and heart you DO have a MOH! !!!!!!!! Lets meet someday in Washington DC and beat up some of these phonies - Nothing gets me more than wannabees- and the wannabee widows? I could write a book on the few I know of--but they are few and far between- and the VA never gives them a dime. What a disgrace they are. A STAR is sure something to be very proud of! Berta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Question
Berta
http://www.va.gov/vetapp01/files03/0120695.txt
I was searching for something else and read this-
"Accordingly, the Board finds that the veteran knowingly,
deliberately, and intentionally presented materially false
and fraudulent statements to the VA in support of his claims
for service connection compensation benefits, and due to such
actions, he has forfeited his rights to VA benefits (aside
from insurance benefits) under 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103(a).
If the positive and negative evidence was in approximate
equipoise, the law requires that the benefit sought be
granted, as the veteran is entitled to the benefit of the
doubt. 38 U.S.C.A. § 5107(B); 38 C.F.R. § 3.102 (2000). In
this case, however, the positive and negative evidence is not
in equipoise. Accordingly, the benefit of the doubt does not
apply.
ORDER
Forfeiture was properly declared against the veteran pursuant
to the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103. The appeal is
denied."
Somehow this veteran gave VA false information and statements that triggered them to investigate
him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
1
Popular Days
Apr 9
7
Apr 11
2
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 2 posts
Testvet 1 post
Pete53 1 post
evandc 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 9 2006
7 posts
Apr 11 2006
2 posts
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts