Am I right to assume that any re-opened claim with new and material evidence, whether the claim is specified or not, that any Service connected condition must be looked at as if it were an implied claim for increase?
I'll try to explain this another way. If I re-open a claim for say a foot condition, but I have other Service conneceted condition of record. must the VA consider the other claims as an implied claim for increase as well?
Question
Rockhound
Am I right to assume that any re-opened claim with new and material evidence, whether the claim is specified or not, that any Service connected condition must be looked at as if it were an implied claim for increase?
I'll try to explain this another way. If I re-open a claim for say a foot condition, but I have other Service conneceted condition of record. must the VA consider the other claims as an implied claim for increase as well?
Rockhound Rider
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
2
1
Popular Days
Dec 16
5
Dec 19
5
Dec 17
2
Top Posters For This Question
deltaj 3 posts
Ricky 2 posts
poolguy11550 2 posts
Rockhound 1 post
Popular Days
Dec 16 2009
5 posts
Dec 19 2009
5 posts
Dec 17 2009
2 posts
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now