Jump to content

Sponsored Ads

  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Tbi Va Low Ball Help


I am rated by the VA for TBI at 40%. I have had a neuro-psych exam and the findings fit the 70% criteria. The VA rated me lower because of a finding of a learning disability referenced in my childhood doctors files. Yes this is what they used to give me a lower rating. I guess it amounts to a preexisting condition. I filled a NOD stating and referring to the exam. I believe the time as passed to file another NOD. I should have asked for help earlier but it is what it is.

Is there anything I can do? Possible have another exam.

Also the neuro exam that I refer to was privately administered and submitted by me with my claim. The VA never sent me to have an exam other than meeting with a psychologist to answer a few questions. I am certain it was not an full neuro-psych exam.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

Did you take an entrance exam?

Have you heard back from the NOD? You need to find out the status of your claim. A NOD probably shouldn't refer to your exams if they state a prior condition because they are aware you could be rated higher without the prior condition. The NOD should be made on the fact that they cannot differentiate the two cognative disorders. Learning disability and TBI are both cognative dissorders and would be rated as one rating if both were SC. Since they cannot seperate the two for testing and get two seperate test results you have to be rated on your current level of functioning. There is absolutley no way they can determine a childhood learning disability has effected your functioning 30% and TBI effected your functioning 40%. The only thing they can determine is that your current functioning loss is 70%.

Without cognative tests when you were a kid, no comparison can be made to determine how much of your cognative problems came from TBI or a "learning disability". Your childhood doctors opinion was subjective and cannot be verified. Your current tests are objective and cannot be refuted.

You completed service, passed training, was able to function as a soldier. You could not have had a substantial disorder at the time. The criteria for 70% is substantial.

I can't remember the federal codes anymore(my own TBI,lol) but there is the one about excaberated conditions.

A learning disability is not the same as organic brain damage but would be rated the same. Just like the VA cannot give you two seperate mental health ratings such as PTSD & Depression because they cannot differentiate the two on functioning, they cannot differentiate (seperate) your current functioning between a learning disability(cognative disorder) and organic cognative disorder due to trauma. They have to rate you on your current functioning or deny the claim. There is no way to say what your functioning would be today without the TBI so they cannot say you were 30% before the TBI and only give you 40% for the injury. I beleive you can win on this alone. I'll have to look it up later but I beleive this is stated quite clearly in the schedule for rating mental disabilities.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


§ 4.22 Rating of disabilities aggravated by active service.

In cases involving aggravation by active service, the rating will reflect only the degree of disability over and above the degree existing at the time of entrance into the active service, whether the particular condition was noted at the time of entrance into the active service, or it is determined upon the evidence of record to have existed at that time. It is necessary therefore, in all cases of this character to deduct from the present degree of disability the degree, if ascertainable, of the disability existing at the time of entrance into active service, in terms of the rating schedule, except that if the disability is total (100 percent) no deduction will be made. The resulting difference will be recorded on the rating sheet. If the degree of disability at the time of entrance into the service is not ascertainable in terms of the schedule, no deduction will be made.

This is what I mean. Take note of the last sentance, "If the degree of disability at the time of entrance into the service is not ascertainable in terms of the schedule, no deduction will be made."

There is no way the VA can know the degree of disability you may have had at time of entrance without a specific evaluation at that time.

You need to NOD on this basis.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your kind replies. The reference to the degree of disability being ascertainable at entrance in service is very helpful. I will write a NOD on this basis. The only problem I have is that I am checking the date from the decision I received from the VA. I am not sure of the date as of now. I am in the middle of moving residences and my VA paperwork is packed up but I will check today. I may have a problem with the length of time that has passed.

If the years time to file a NOD has passed do I have any other options?

If not, I have not one to blame but myself. I should have kept up on this and should not have let this go on as long as I have.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


What is the date of the Rating Decision that granted TBI as SC'd at 40 % ?

You posted,

"The VA rated me lower because of a finding of a learning disability referenced in my childhood doctors files. Yes this is what

they used to give me a lower rating. I guess it amounts to a preexisting condition. I filled a NOD stating and referring to the exam."

When you get back together with your paperwork, please post exactly and completely, what is stated in the Reasons and Bases

in regards to the issue of TBI.

Only leave out personal info like name, claim #, address, etc..

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the Rating decision for 40% TBI was granted on 26 June 2009. I did however file a letter asking for a review and reconsideration on 16 July 2009 asking to reference the privately administered neuro-psych test I included with my claim. This private exam referenced and included many descriptions in the results to "mild, moderate, significant short-term memory difficulty, clinically significant problems." I can get into more detail I just wanted to set the stage for the significance of the results of the private neuro-psych exam.

I believe there are 2 problems I have or the VA depending on how you look at it. 1. The finding is based on my private exam. To my knowledge the VA never administered a full neuro-psych exam. The exam the VA conducted was very short in nature about 30-45 minutes of questions. In asking a fellow veteran about his process at the same facility for TBI claim he is going through, he received the same line of questioning and was then sent to an outside facility to have a full neuro-exam administered. The VA letter under REASONS FOR DECISION there are several several paragraphs that start with "A level of severity of 0" which of course is favorable for a low ball offer. I am not sure what the section of reasons for decision is based on since I do not believe the VA ever conducted a full exam only preliminary. It is as if the VA examiner "pencil whipped" a full neuro-psych exam with out conducting one.

First I will include the response I originally stated with the reference to a childhood learning disability:

"The examiner's diagnosis was that of mild concussion. The examiner opined that it was less likely as not that your mild neurocognitive dysfunction was attributed to your service during combat as you manifested abnormalities prior to military service, and have been able to maintain your same level of functioning (working , EMT/Fire Company, physical activity) subsequent to military service. The examiner's opinion had minimum probative value since it was predicated on a singular report of a learning disability at age 13, per private treatment records in the claimant's file."

Here is the VA response to my letter asking for a reconsideration:

"You submitted a treatment report from (private facility) dated June 17, 2008. This report was considered in our recent decision. It was also reviewed and referenced by the VA examiner during the VA examination conducted on April 23, 2009. Although this report does indicate a greater severity of symptoms in some areas, it was conducted approximately ten months earlier than our VA examination and four months before you filed your claim. Our decisions must be based on the most current assessment of a disability. A review of the current VA examination and our Rating Decision dated June, 26, 2009, does not reveal any error. A higher evaluation for your residuals of traumatic brain injury is not warranted by the evidence of record. "

Sorry for the long post but it is rather complex

Edited by bigoc

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 3 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:


      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.


      • 10 replies

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines