Rockman is rated @ 60% for Agent Orange IHD. He went to his cardiologist on Monday of this week. He is @ 35-40% EF now. He was @ 40-45% in November 2010.
He added a med and increased one of his meds. He cannot walk from one room to another room without completely worn out. The cardiologist did not do a Met's on him previously. He should be less than 3, if I read all of it right. He can only tie his shoes and put on his socks sitting down.
His diagnosis on the sheet had secondary cardiomyopathy.
My question is:
Can he file or should he file for secondary cardiomyopathy SECONDARYy to AO IHD? I know that the code for th is is 7020. Any ideas as to what he should do.
Also his cardiologist is going to include in his files that his pulmonary condition does aggravate and worsen his heart condition and vice versa. We will then file the pulmonary fibrosis as secondary to the IHD.
Since it was denied on the pulmonary fibrosis, we figure that we cannot go back and do a nod and state that it does aggravate he heart and also send in additional e vidence. If we start all over, then we loose the Feb. '10 date. This is the correct way we should do it, or is it?
Question
mrs rockman (widow of vet)
Rockman is rated @ 60% for Agent Orange IHD. He went to his cardiologist on Monday of this week. He is @ 35-40% EF now. He was @ 40-45% in November 2010.
He added a med and increased one of his meds. He cannot walk from one room to another room without completely worn out. The cardiologist did not do a Met's on him previously. He should be less than 3, if I read all of it right. He can only tie his shoes and put on his socks sitting down.
His diagnosis on the sheet had secondary cardiomyopathy.
My question is:
Can he file or should he file for secondary cardiomyopathy SECONDARYy to AO IHD? I know that the code for th is is 7020. Any ideas as to what he should do.
Also his cardiologist is going to include in his files that his pulmonary condition does aggravate and worsen his heart condition and vice versa. We will then file the pulmonary fibrosis as secondary to the IHD.
Since it was denied on the pulmonary fibrosis, we figure that we cannot go back and do a nod and state that it does aggravate he heart and also send in additional e vidence. If we start all over, then we loose the Feb. '10 date. This is the correct way we should do it, or is it?
Mrs. R
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
1
1
Popular Days
Jun 22
6
Top Posters For This Question
mrs rockman (widow of vet) 4 posts
Berta 1 post
Chuck75 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 22 2011
6 posts
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now