I was intially given a non compensatiable ie zero perscent on scar and inguanal hernia.
I appealed in 2004 and had a CNP in 2012 they said they found new evidence or there was a new disabiliyt ie Pain .
I am stating the pain was already there and this is an appeal for an upgrade they paid me the ten percent backed to march 2012 not 2004 and say they have upgraded my scar and hernia to ten percent hence I should be given the back date of 2004 of my appeal as I am saying the same conditins exist adn there is no new claim in period please explain this to me I am looking for a EED.
Question
KDM
I was intially given a non compensatiable ie zero perscent on scar and inguanal hernia.
I appealed in 2004 and had a CNP in 2012 they said they found new evidence or there was a new disabiliyt ie Pain .
I am stating the pain was already there and this is an appeal for an upgrade they paid me the ten percent backed to march 2012 not 2004 and say they have upgraded my scar and hernia to ten percent hence I should be given the back date of 2004 of my appeal as I am saying the same conditins exist adn there is no new claim in period please explain this to me I am looking for a EED.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
6
3
2
2
Popular Days
Apr 6
5
Apr 7
4
Apr 8
4
Apr 9
2
Top Posters For This Question
broncovet 6 posts
john999 3 posts
FormerMember 2 posts
KDM 2 posts
Popular Days
Apr 6 2013
5 posts
Apr 7 2013
4 posts
Apr 8 2013
4 posts
Apr 9 2013
2 posts
14 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now