I filed two claims last year for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence. I was denied both of them because the C&P Examiner said I haven't been diagnosed with them even though Dr. Bash diagnosed me back in July 2012 with them.
Today I go see a VA GI Doctor and in his notes he writes in his impression: "44 y.o. mail with urinary and fecal incontinence since 2010, most likely related to spinal injury from jumping from helicopter"
Is this enough evidence along with Dr. Bash's to refile with NEW EVIDENCE instead of a NOD?
The GI is going to try some treatments on me to see if they can "help" with these issues.
Question
rpowell01
Okay I want to get this correct.
I filed two claims last year for Bladder and Bowel Incontinence. I was denied both of them because the C&P Examiner said I haven't been diagnosed with them even though Dr. Bash diagnosed me back in July 2012 with them.
Today I go see a VA GI Doctor and in his notes he writes in his impression: "44 y.o. mail with urinary and fecal incontinence since 2010, most likely related to spinal injury from jumping from helicopter"
Is this enough evidence along with Dr. Bash's to refile with NEW EVIDENCE instead of a NOD?
The GI is going to try some treatments on me to see if they can "help" with these issues.
Edited by rpowell01Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
4
1
Popular Days
Jul 10
8
Jul 9
1
Top Posters For This Question
Vync 4 posts
rpowell01 4 posts
Berta 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 10 2013
8 posts
Jul 9 2013
1 post
8 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now